The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers

12. Molotoks A, Kuhnert M, Dawson TP, Smith P. Global hotspots of conflict risk between food security and biodiversity conservation. Land. 2017; 6(4): 67. 13. Hannah L, Roehrdanz PR, Ikegami M, Shepard AV, Shaw MR, Tabor G, et al. Climate change, wine, and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013; 110: 6907–6912. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210127110 PMID: 23569231 14. Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J, Schelly I, Morton DC, Noojipady P, et al. Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Sci- ence. 2015; 347: 377–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181 15. Koh LP, Wilcove DS. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conservation Letters. 2008; 1: 60–64. 16. Austin KG, Gonzalez-Roglich M, Schaffer-Smith D, Schwantes AM, Swenson JJ. Trends in size of tropi- cal deforestation events signal increasing dominance of industrial-scale drivers. Environmental Research Letters. 2017; 12. 17. Curtis PG, Slay CM, Harris NL, Tyukavina A, Hansen MC. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Sci- ence. 2018; 361: 1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445 PMID: 30213911 18. Turner WR, Bradley BA, Estes LD, Hole DG, Oppenheimer M, Wilcove DS. Climate change: helping nature survive the human response. Conservation Letters. 2010; 3: 304–312. 19. Humpeno¨ der F, Popp A, Bodirsky BL, Weindl I, Biewald A, Lotze-Campen H, et al. Large-scale bioe- nergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? Environmental Research Letters. 2018; 13: 024011.

20. Prestele R, Alexander P, Rounsevell MDA, Arneth A, Calvin K, Doelman J, et al. Hotspots of uncertainty in land-use and land-cover change projections: a global-scale model comparison. Global Change Biol- ogy. 2016; 22: 3967–3983. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337 PMID: 27135635 21. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate sur- faces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 2005; 25 (15): 1965–1978. 22. Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Cruz M, Rojas E. Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data. 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter. 2001; 127: 15–19. 23. Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Jarvis A, O’Brien R, Mathur P, Bussink C, et al. DIVA-GIS: Version 5.2 Manual. DIVA-GIS. 2005. 24. FAO Ecocrop Data Portal. http://ecocrop.fao.org/ecocrop/srv/en/home 25. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distribu- tions. Ecological Modelling. 2006; 190: 231–259. 26. Gourdji SM, Sibley AM, Lobell DB. Global crop exposure to critical high temperatures in the reproduc- tive period: historical trends and future projections. Environmental Research Letters. 2011; 8: 24–41. 27. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Twentieth Century Reanalysis Version 2: 4-times daily and daily average monolevel [dataset]. 2016. 28. Sacks WJ, Deryng D, Foley JA, Ramankutty N. Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2011; 19: 607–620.

29. Mulligan M. WaterWorld: a self-parameterising, physically-based model for application in data-poor but problem-rich environments globally. Hydrology Research. 2013; 44(5): 748–769. 30. LandScan 2011 high resolution global population data set copyrighted by UT-Battelle, LLC, operator of Oak Ridge National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the United States Department of Energy. 2011. 31. Mulligan M. The human water quality footprint: agricultural, industrial, and urban impacts on the quality of available water globally and in the Andean region. Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Water Resource Management and Climate Change. Cali, CO; 2009. p. 11. 32. Lehner B, Verdin K, Jarvis A. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos Transactions. 2008; 89(10): 93–94. 33. Mulligan M, Saenz-Cruz L, van Soesbergen A, Smith VT, Zurita L. Global dams database and geowiki version 1 [Internet]. 2009b. http://geodata.policysupport.org/dams. 34. Fritz S, See L, McCallum I, You L, Bun A, Moltchanova E, et al. Mapping global cropland and field size. Global Change Biology. 2015; 21: 1980–1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12838 PMID: 25640302 35. Hengl T, Mendes de Jesus J, Heuvelink GBM, Ruiperez Gonzalez M, Kilibarda M, Blagotic A, et al., SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE. 2012; 12: e.0169748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 PMID: 28207752 36. Guo L, Giff RM. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology. 2002; 8: 345–360.

The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228305 February 12, 2020 16 / 19

37. Don A, Schumacher J, Freibauer A. Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks–a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology. 2011; 17: 1658–1670. 38. Scharlemann JPW, Tanner EVJ, Hiederer R, Kapos V. Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Management. 2014; 5: 81–91. 39. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. Final report. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IPCC). 2003. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf_contents.html 40. Channan S, Collins K, Emanuel WR. Global mosaics of the standard MODIS land cover type data [data- set]. College Park (MD): University of Maryland and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2014. http://glcf.umd.edu/data/lc/ 41. Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley, A, et al. MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets, 2001–2012, Collection 5.1 IGBP Land Cover [dataset] Boston (MA): Boston University; 2010. http://glcf.umd.edu/data/lc/ 42. Mittermeier RA, Robles-Gil P, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim JD, Brooks TB, Mittermeier C, et al. Hotspots revis- ited: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered ecoregions. Mexico City: CEMEX; 2004. 390 p. 43. Potapov P, Yaroshenko A, Turubanova S, Dubinin M, Laestadius L, Thies C, et al. Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecology and Society. 2008; 13(2): p.16.

44. IUCN. Consolidating the standards for identifying sites that contribute significantly to the global persis- tence of biodiversity: the results of a framing workshop. Cambridge (UK): Species Survival Commission Joint Task Force on Biodiversity and Protected Areas, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland. 2012 June. 45. Langhammer PF, Bakarr MI, Bennun LA, Brooks TM, Clay RP, Darwall W, et al. Identification and gap analysis of key biodiversity areas: targets for comprehensive protected area systems. 2007. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. 46. Endemic bird special data. 2016. Birdlife International. 47. Parry ML, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Livermore M, Fischer G. Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change. 2004; 14 (1): 53–67. 48. Tilman D. Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: The need for sustainable and effi- cient practices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999; 96: 5995–6000. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995 PMID: 10339530 49. Phelps J, Carrasco LR, Webb EL, Koh LP, Pascual U. Agricultural intensification escalates future con- servation costs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013; 110: 7601–7606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220070110 PMID: 23589860 50. Laurance WF, Sayer J, Cassman KG. Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2014; 29: 107–116.

51. Watson JEM. Human responses to climate change will impact biodiversity conservation: it’s time we start planning for them. Conservation Letters. 2014; 7: 1–2. 52. Popp A, Calvin K, Fujimori S, Havlik P, Humpenoder F, Stehfest E, et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environmental Change. 2017; 42: 331–345. 53. Crowther TW, Todd-Brown KEO, Rowe CW, Wieder WR, Carey JC, Machmuller BL, et al. Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature. 2016; 104: 104–108. 54. Davidson EA, Ackerman IL. Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils. Biogeochemistry. 1993; 20: 161–193. 55. Boden TA, Marland G, Andres RJ. Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel co2 emissions [dataset]. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy: Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 2016. 56. Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds.). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Internet]. Geneva (CH): IPCC; 2014. 57. Schlesinger WH. Carbon sequestration in soils. Science. 1999; 284(5423): 2095. https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.284.5423.2095 58. Reicosky DC, Dugas WA, Torbert HA. Tillage-induced soil carbon dioxide loss from different cropping systems. Soil & Tillage Research. 1997; 41: 105–118, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-1987 (96)01080-x 59. Stattersfield AJ, Crosby MJ, Long AJ,Wege DC. Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodiver-

sity conservation [Internet]. Cambridge: Birdlife International; 1998. http://datazone.birdlife.org/info/ pubEBAs The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228305 February 12, 2020 17 / 19

60. Rogelj J, Den Elzen M, Ho¨ hne N, Fransen T, Fekete H, Winkler H, et al. Paris Agreement climate pro- posals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C. Nature. 2016; 534(7609), 631. https://doi.org/10. 1038/nature18307 PMID: 27357792 61. Steffen W, Rockstrom J, Richardson K, Lenton TM, Folke C, Liverman D, et al. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018; 115(33): 8252– 8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115 62. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstro¨ m J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science. 2015; 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.1259855 PMID: 25592418 63. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2003; 100(14): 8074–8079. 64. Fraser EDG. Coping with food crises: lessons from the American Dust Bowl on balancing local food, agro technology, social welfare, and government regulation agendas in food and farming systems. Global Environmental Change. 2013; 23: 1662–1672. 65. Pearce F. When the rivers run dry: water—the defining crisis of the twenty-first century. Beacon Press. 2007, Boston, MA, United States, 324 pp. 66. Government of Northwest Territories. The business of food: a food production plan 2017–2022. North- west Territories Agriculture Strategy. Government of Northwest Territories Canada. 2017. https://www.

75. McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B. The rising tide: assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and urbanization. 2007; 19(1): 17–37. 76. Dupuis I, Dumas C. Influence of temperature stress on invitro fertilization and heat-shock protein-syn- thesis in maize (Zea-mays l) reproductive tissues. Plant Physiology. 1990; 94: 665–670. https://doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.94.2.665 PMID: 16667763 77. Bakker M. Sugarcane cultivation and management, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. 1999; New York, USA. 78. Pallas B, Clement-Vidal A, Rebolledo MC, Soulie JC, Luquet D. Using plant growth modeling to analyze C source-sink relations under drought: inter- and intraspecific comparison. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2013; 4. 79. Keating BA, Evenson JP. Effect of soil-temperature on sprouting and sprout elongation of stem cuttings of cassava (Manihot-esculenta crantz). Field Crops Research. 1979; 2: 241–251. 80. Prasad PV, Craufurd PQ, Summerfield RJ. Effect of high air and soil temperature on dry matter produc- tion, pod yield and yield components of groundnut. Plant and Soil. 2000; 222: 231–239. 81. Prasad PV, Craufurd PQ, Summerfield RJ, Wheeler TR. Effects of short episodes of heat stress on flower production and fruit-set of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Experimental Botany. 2000; 51: 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.777 PMID: 10938870 82. Ong CK. Agrometeorology of Groundnut: Proceedings of an International Symposium. 21–26 Aug

1985, ICRISAT Sahelian Center, Niamey, Niger.P atancheru. A.P. 502 324, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 1986; 115–125. The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228305 February 12, 2020 18 / 19

83. Kakani VG, Reddy KR, Koti S, Wallace TP, Prasad VP, Reddy VR, et al. Differences in in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of cotton cultivars in response to high temperature. Annals of Bot- any. 2005; 96: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci149 PMID: 15851397 84. Reddy KR, Hodges HF, McKinion JM. Carbon-dioxide and temperature effects on pima cotton develop- ment. Agronomy Journal. 1995; 87: 820–826. 85. Reddy KR, Hodges HF. Temperature effects on early season cotton growth and development. Agron- omy Journal. 1992; 84: 229–237. 86. Ong CK, Monteith JL. Response of pearl-millet to light and temperature. Field Crops Research. 1985; 11: 141–160. 87. Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Mutava RN, Tuinstra MR. Sensitivity of grain sorghum to high temperature stress during reproductive development. Crop Science. 2008; 48: 1911–1917. 88. Dwelle RB, Kleinkopf GE, Pavek JJ. Potato Research.1981; 24: 49–59. 89. Porter JR, Gawith M. Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review. European Journal of Agronomy. 1999; 10: 23–36. 90. IIASA/FAO. Global Agro-ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0). 2012. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy. 91. Kriegler E, Bauer N, Popp A, Humpeno¨ der F, Leimbach M, Strefler J, et al. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Global Environmental Change. 2017; 42:297–315. The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228305 February 12, 2020 19 / 19