The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers

83. Kakani VG, Reddy KR, Koti S, Wallace TP, Prasad VP, Reddy VR, et al. Differences in in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of cotton cultivars in response to high temperature. Annals of Bot- any. 2005; 96: 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci149 PMID: 15851397 84. Reddy KR, Hodges HF, McKinion JM. Carbon-dioxide and temperature effects on pima cotton develop- ment. Agronomy Journal. 1995; 87: 820–826. 85. Reddy KR, Hodges HF. Temperature effects on early season cotton growth and development. Agron- omy Journal. 1992; 84: 229–237. 86. Ong CK, Monteith JL. Response of pearl-millet to light and temperature. Field Crops Research. 1985; 11: 141–160. 87. Prasad PVV, Pisipati SR, Mutava RN, Tuinstra MR. Sensitivity of grain sorghum to high temperature stress during reproductive development. Crop Science. 2008; 48: 1911–1917. 88. Dwelle RB, Kleinkopf GE, Pavek JJ. Potato Research.1981; 24: 49–59. 89. Porter JR, Gawith M. Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review. European Journal of Agronomy. 1999; 10: 23–36. 90. IIASA/FAO. Global Agro-ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0). 2012. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria and FAO, Rome, Italy. 91. Kriegler E, Bauer N, Popp A, Humpeno¨ der F, Leimbach M, Strefler J, et al. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Global Environmental Change. 2017; 42:297–315. The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228305 February 12, 2020 19 / 19