Thông tin tài nguyên

The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers

pmc-PMC7015311.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 19 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 16 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

12. Molotoks A, Kuhnert M, Dawson TP, Smith P. Global hotspots of conflict risk between food security and biodiversity conservation. Land. 2017; 6(4): 67. 13. Hannah L, Roehrdanz PR, Ikegami M, Shepard AV, Shaw MR, Tabor G, et al. Climate change, wine, and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013; 110: 6907–6912. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210127110 PMID: 23569231 14. Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J, Schelly I, Morton DC, Noojipady P, et al. Brazil’s Soy Moratorium. Sci- ence. 2015; 347: 377–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0181 15. Koh LP, Wilcove DS. Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? Conservation Letters. 2008; 1: 60–64. 16. Austin KG, Gonzalez-Roglich M, Schaffer-Smith D, Schwantes AM, Swenson JJ. Trends in size of tropi- cal deforestation events signal increasing dominance of industrial-scale drivers. Environmental Research Letters. 2017; 12. 17. Curtis PG, Slay CM, Harris NL, Tyukavina A, Hansen MC. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Sci- ence. 2018; 361: 1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau3445 PMID: 30213911 18. Turner WR, Bradley BA, Estes LD, Hole DG, Oppenheimer M, Wilcove DS. Climate change: helping nature survive the human response. Conservation Letters. 2010; 3: 304–312. 19. Humpeno¨ der F, Popp A, Bodirsky BL, Weindl I, Biewald A, Lotze-Campen H, et al. Large-scale bioe- nergy production: how to resolve sustainability trade-offs? Environmental Research Letters. 2018; 13: 024011.

Trang 16 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

20. Prestele R, Alexander P, Rounsevell MDA, Arneth A, Calvin K, Doelman J, et al. Hotspots of uncertainty in land-use and land-cover change projections: a global-scale model comparison. Global Change Biol- ogy. 2016; 22: 3967–3983. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13337 PMID: 27135635 21. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate sur- faces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology. 2005; 25 (15): 1965–1978. 22. Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Cruz M, Rojas E. Computer tools for spatial analysis of plant genetic resources data. 1. DIVA-GIS. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter. 2001; 127: 15–19. 23. Hijmans RJ, Guarino L, Jarvis A, O’Brien R, Mathur P, Bussink C, et al. DIVA-GIS: Version 5.2 Manual. DIVA-GIS. 2005. 24. FAO Ecocrop Data Portal. http://ecocrop.fao.org/ecocrop/srv/en/home 25. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distribu- tions. Ecological Modelling. 2006; 190: 231–259. 26. Gourdji SM, Sibley AM, Lobell DB. Global crop exposure to critical high temperatures in the reproduc- tive period: historical trends and future projections. Environmental Research Letters. 2011; 8: 24–41. 27. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Twentieth Century Reanalysis Version 2: 4-times daily and daily average monolevel [dataset]. 2016. 28. Sacks WJ, Deryng D, Foley JA, Ramankutty N. Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2011; 19: 607–620.

Trang 16 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

29. Mulligan M. WaterWorld: a self-parameterising, physically-based model for application in data-poor but problem-rich environments globally. Hydrology Research. 2013; 44(5): 748–769. 30. LandScan 2011 high resolution global population data set copyrighted by UT-Battelle, LLC, operator of Oak Ridge National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the United States Department of Energy. 2011. 31. Mulligan M. The human water quality footprint: agricultural, industrial, and urban impacts on the quality of available water globally and in the Andean region. Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Water Resource Management and Climate Change. Cali, CO; 2009. p. 11. 32. Lehner B, Verdin K, Jarvis A. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos Transactions. 2008; 89(10): 93–94. 33. Mulligan M, Saenz-Cruz L, van Soesbergen A, Smith VT, Zurita L. Global dams database and geowiki version 1 [Internet]. 2009b. http://geodata.policysupport.org/dams. 34. Fritz S, See L, McCallum I, You L, Bun A, Moltchanova E, et al. Mapping global cropland and field size. Global Change Biology. 2015; 21: 1980–1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12838 PMID: 25640302 35. Hengl T, Mendes de Jesus J, Heuvelink GBM, Ruiperez Gonzalez M, Kilibarda M, Blagotic A, et al., SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE. 2012; 12: e.0169748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 PMID: 28207752 36. Guo L, Giff RM. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology. 2002; 8: 345–360.

Trang 16 · Đoạn 44Vị trí nguồn

The environmental consequences of climate-driven agricultural frontiers PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228305 February 12, 2020 16 / 19