Molecular diet studies of water mites reveal prey biodiversity

29. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, DeWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences. 2003; 270(1512):313–21. WOS:000181064200013. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 PMID: 12614582 30. Gerecke R. Revisional studies on the European species of the water mite genus Lebertia NEUMAN, 1880 (Acari: Hydrachnidia: Lebertiidae). Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft. 2009; 566:1–141. BCI:BCI200900481354. 31. Yuen KK. 2-sample trimmed t for unequal population variances. Biometrika. 1974; 61(1):165–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334299 WOS:A1974S717000020. 32. Hirsch RM, Slack JR. A nonparametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence. Water Resources Research. 1984; 20(6): 727–32. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i006p00727 WOS: A1984SX55700012. 33. Olmos-Pe´ rez L, Roura A´ , Pierce GJ, Boyer S, Gonza´ lez A´ F. Diet Composition and Variability of Wild Octopus vulgaris and Alloteuthis media (Cephalopoda) Paralarvae: a Metagenomic Approach. 2017; 8 (321). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00321 PMID: 28596735 34. Pozojevic I, Jursic L, Vuckovic N, Doric V, Gottstein S, Ternjej I, et al. Is the spatial distribution of lentic water mite assemblages (Acari: Hydrachnidia) governed by prey availability? Experimental and Applied Acarology. 2019; 77(4):487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-019-00362-8 WOS:000468592300003. PMID: 31089977 35. Pozojević I. Prey abundance supporting unusual water mite (Acari: Hydrachnidia) community in a subla-

custrine spring and tributary river. Acta Biologica. 2018; 25:69–75. https://doi.org/10.18276/ab.2018. 25–06 36. Failla AJ, Vasquez AA, Hudson P, Fujimoto M, Ram JL. Morphological identification and COI barcodes of adult flies help determine species identities of chironomid larvae (Diptera, Chironomidae). Bull Ento- mol Res. 2016; 106(1):34–46. Epub 2015/06/16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485315000486 PMID: 26072670. 37. David Evans Walter, Proctor HC. Mites: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour Life at a Microscale. 2 ed2013. 38. Erseus C, Envall I, De Wit P, Gustaysson LM. Molecular data reveal a tropical freshwater origin of Naidi- nae (Annelida, Clitellata, Naididae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2017; 115:115–27. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.07.016 WOS:000409156200013. PMID: 28743643 39. Kotov AA, Karabanov DP, Bekker EI, Neretina TV, Taylor DJ. Phylogeography of the Chydorus sphaeri- cus Group (Cladocera: Chydoridae) in the Northern Palearctic. Plos One. 2016; 11(12). https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0168711 WOS:000392842600092. PMID: 27992559 40. Ruiz MO, Walker ED, Foster ES, Haramis LD, Kitron UD. Association of West Nile virus illness and urban landscapes in Chicago and Detroit. Int J Health Geogr. 2007; 6:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476- 072X-6-11 WOS:000258120300002. PMID: 17362510 41. Trekels H, Vanschoenwinkel B. Both local presence and regional distribution of predator cues modulate prey colonisation in pond landscapes. Ecol Lett. 2019; 22(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13170 WOS:000453562900008. PMID: 30370574

42. Marshall JF. The British Mosquitoes. London: British Museum of Natural History; 1938. xi + 441 p. 43. Varney RL, Noor MAF. The scuttle fly. Current Biology. 2010; 20(11):R466–R7. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cub.2010.03.043 WOS:000278662500008. PMID: 20541488 44. Proctor HC. Can freshwater mites act as forensic tools? Exp Appl Acarol. 2009; 49(1–2):161–5. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10493-009-9273-z WOS:000268544100012. PMID: 19513807 45. Goldschmidt T, Helson JE, Williams DD. Ecology of water mite assemblages in Panama—First data on water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia) as bioindicators in the assessment of biological integrity of neotropical streams. Limnologica. 2016; 59:63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2016.03.007 WOS:000380418300006. 46. Goldschmidt T. Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia): powerful but widely neglected bioindicators—a review. Neotropical Biodiversity. 2016; 2(1):12–25. ZOOREC:ZOOR15412081558. 47. Wiecek M, Martin P, Gabka M. Distribution patterns and environmental correlates of water mites (Hydrachnidia, Acari) in peatland microhabitats. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 2013; 61(2):147– 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-013-9692-8 WOS:000323662300001. PMID: 23564226 48. Smith BP, Hagman J. Experimental evidence for a female sex pheromone in Arrenurus manubriator (Acari: Hydrachnida; Arrenuridae). Exp Appl Acarol. 2002; 27(4):257–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/ a:1023328428716 WOS:000182273200001. PMID: 12797400 49. Trebitz AS, Hoffman JC, Grant GW, Billehus TM, Pilgrim EM. Potential for DNA-based identification of

Great Lakes fauna: match and mismatch between taxa inventories and DNA barcode libraries. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5:Article number 12162, 11 pp. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12162 WOS:000358303900001. PMID: 26199185 PLOS ONE Prey DNA diversity in water mites PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254598 July 29, 2021 18 / 18