Green treasures: Investigating the biodiversity potential of equine yards through the presence and quality of landscape features in the Netherlands

51. Phillips BB, Bullock JM, Osborne JL, Gaston KJ. Ecosystem service provision by road verges. Journal of Applied Ecology 2020; 57:488–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13556. 52. Pfiffner L, Cahenzli F, Steinemann B, Jamar L, Bjørn MC, Porcel M, et al. Design, implementation and management of perennial flower strips to promote functional agrobiodiversity in organic apple orchards: A pan-European study. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2019; 278:61–71. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.agee.2019.03.005. 53. Wratten SD, Gillespie M, Decourtye A, Mader E, Desneux N. Pollinator habitat enhancement: Benefits to other ecosystem services. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2012; 159:112–22. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.020. 54. Tschumi M, Albrecht M, Entling MH, Jacot K. High effectiveness of tailored flower strips in reducing pests and crop plant damage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2015; 282:20151369. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1369 PMID: 26311668 55. Paar P, Ro¨ hricht W, Schuler J. Towards a planning support system for environmental management and agri-environmental measures—The Colorfields study. Journal of Environmental Management 2008; 89:234–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.047 PMID: 17767997 56. Ba´ tori Z, Kiss PJ, To¨ lgyesi C, Dea´k B, Valko´ O, To¨ ro¨ k P, et al. River embankments mitigate the loss of grassland biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. River Research and Applications 2020; 36:1160–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3643.

57. Ba´ tori Z, Ko¨ rmo¨czi L, Zalatnai M, Erdős L, O´ dor P, To¨lgyesi C, et al. River Dikes in Agricultural Land- scapes: The Importance of Secondary Habitats in Maintaining Landscape-Scale Diversity. Wetlands 2016; 36:251–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-016-0734-y. 58. Sutherland LA. Horsification: Embodied gentrification in rural landscapes. Geoforum 2021; 126:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.020. 59. van Wijk-Jansen E, Visser-Riedstra K, Verstegen J, Kortstee H. Passie voor paarden: Een onderzoek naar de belevingswereld en het informatiezoekgedrag van paardenliefhebbers in Nederland. Den Haag: 2009. 60. Bata´ ry P, Ba´ ldi A, Kleijn D, Tscharntke T. Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environ- mental management: a meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011; 278:1894–902. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1923 PMID: 21106585 61. Greiner R. Motivations and attitudes influence farmers’ willingness to participate in biodiversity conser- vation contracts. Agricultural Systems 2015; 137:154–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.04.005. 62. Hockenhull J, Creighton E. The day-to-day management of UK leisure horses and the prevalence of owner-reported stable-related and handling behaviour problems. Animal Welfare 2015; 24:29–36. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.24.1.029. 63. Mazzola SM, Colombani C, Pizzamiglio G, Cannas S, Palestrini C, Costa ED, et al. Do You Think I Am Living Well? A Four-Season Hair Cortisol Analysis on Leisure Horses in Different Housing and Manage-

ment Conditions. Animals 2021; 11:2141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072141 PMID: 34359269 64. Mentges A, Blowes SA, Hodapp D, Hillebrand H, Chase JM. Effects of site-selection bias on estimates of biodiversity change. Conservation Biology 2021; 35:688–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13610 PMID: 32808693 65. Conrad CC, Hilchey KG. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2011; 176:273–91. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10661-010-1582-5 PMID: 20640506 66. Delaney DG, Sperling CD, Adams CS, Leung B. Marine invasive species: validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions 2008; 10:117–28. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10530-007-9114-0. 67. Ja¨ ckel D, Mortega KG, Sturm U, Brockmeyer U, Khorramshahi O, Voigt-Heucke SL. Opportunities and limitations: A comparative analysis of citizen science and expert recordings for bioacoustic research. PLOS ONE 2021; 16:e0253763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253763 PMID: 34181671 PLOS ONE Biodiversity potential of equine yards through landscape features PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301168 April 11, 2024 16 / 16