Thông tin tài nguyên

A novel use of Stereo Baited Remote Underwater Video and Drop-Down Video for biodiversity and marine landscape mapping and prediction

pmc-PMC11967939.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 23 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 19 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

9. Micallef A, Le Bas TP, Huvenne VAI, Blondel P, Hühnerbach V, Deidun A. A multi-method approach for benthic habitat mapping of shallow coastal areas with high-resolution multibeam data. Continental Shelf Research. 2012;39–40:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.03.008

Trang 20 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319355 April 3, 2025 20 / 23 PLOS ONE Marine landscape and biodiversity mapping using SBRUVs and DDV 10. Hall-Spencer J, Allain V, Fosså JH. Trawling damage to Northeast Atlantic ancient coral reefs. Proc Biol Sci. 2002;269(1490):507–11. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1910 PMID: 11886643 11. Auster PJ, Malatesta RJ, Langton RW, Watting L, Valentine PC, Donaldson CLS, et al. The impacts of mobile fishing gear on seafloor habitats in the gulf of Maine (Northwest Atlantic): Implications for conservation of fish populations. Reviews in Fisheries Science. 1996;4(2):185–202. https://doi. org/10.1080/10641269609388584 12. Horne JK. Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: a review. Fisheries Oceanography. 2000;9(4):356–71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2419.2000.00143.x 13. Barrett N, Seiler J, Anderson T, Williams S, Nichol S, Hill S. Autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) for mapping marine biodiversity in coastal and shelf waters: Implications for marine management. Sydney: OCEANS’10 IEEE; 2010. p. 1–6. 14. Cappo M, Harvey E, Malcolm H, Speare P. Potential of Video Techniques to Monitor Diversity, Abundance and Size of Fish in Studies of Marine Protected Areas. In: Beumer JP, Grant A, Smith DC, editors. Aquatic protected areas What works best and how do we know? Queensland: University of Queensland; 2003. p. 455-64. 15. Langlois T, Harvey E, Fitzpatrick B, Meeuwig J, Shedrawi G, Watson D. Cost-efficient sampling of

Trang 20 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

fish assemblages: comparison of baited video stations and diver video transects. Aquatic Biology. 2010;9(2):155–68. https://doi.org/10.3354/ab00235 16. Bicknell A, Godley B, Sheehan E, Votier S, Witt M. Camera technology for monitoring marine biodi- versity and human impact. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2016;14(8):424–32. https://doi. org/10.1002/fee.1322 17. Harvey E, Newman S, McLean D, Cappo M, Meeuwig J, Skepper C. Comparison of the relative effi- ciencies of stereo-BRUVs and traps for sampling tropical continental shelf demersal fishes. Fisheries Research. 2012;125:108–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.01.026 18. Elliott SAM, Sabatino AD, Heath MR, Turrell WR, Bailey DM. Landscape effects on demersal fish revealed by field observations and predictive seabed modelling. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189011 PMID: 29228035 19. Bailey D, King N, Priede I. Cameras and carcasses: historical and current methods for using artificial food falls to study deep-water animals. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007;350:179–91. https://doi. org/10.3354/meps07187 20. Cappo M, Harvey E, Shortis M, editors. Counting and measuring fish with baited video techniques-an overview. Australian Society for Fish Biology Workshop Proceedings. Tasmania: Australian Society for Fish Biology; 2006. 21. Harvey ES, Cappo M, Butler JJ, Hall N, Kendrick GA. Bait attraction affects the performance of remote underwater video stations in assessment of demersal fish community structure. Marine Ecol-

Trang 20 · Đoạn 44Vị trí nguồn

ogy Progress Series. 2007;350:245–54. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07192 22. Watson D, Harvey E, Anderson M, Kendrick G. A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques. Marine Biology. 2005;148(2):415–25. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-0090-6 23. Cappo M, Speare P, De’ath G. Comparison of baited remote underwater video stations (BRUVS) and prawn (shrimp) trawls for assessments of fish biodiversity in inter-reefal areas of the great barrier reef marine park. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2004;302(2):123–52. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jembe.2003.10.006 24. Unsworth RKF, Peters JR, McCloskey RM, Hinder SL. Optimising stereo baited underwater video for sampling fish and invertebrates in temperate coastal habitats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2014;150:281–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.03.020 25. Ghazilou A, Shokri M, Gladstone W. Comparison of baited remote underwater video (BRUV) and underwater visual census (UVC) for assessment of reef fish in a marginal reef in the northern Persian Gulf. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology. 2019;6(3):197–207. https://doi.org/10.22034/iji.v6i3.353 26. Lowry M, Folpp H, Gregson M, Suthers I. Comparison of baited remote underwater video (BRUV) and underwater visual census (UVC) for assessment of artificial reefs in estuaries. Journal of Experimen- tal Marine Biology and Ecology. 2012;416–417:243–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2012.01.013 27. Dunlop KM, Marian Scott E, Parsons D, Bailey DM. Do agonistic behaviours bias baited remote

Trang 20 · Đoạn 45Vị trí nguồn

underwater video surveys of fish? Marine Ecology. 2014;36(3):810–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ maec.12185 28. Seitz RD, Wennhage H, Bergström U, Lipcius RN, Ysebaert T. Ecological value of coastal habitats for commercially and ecologically important species. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2013;71(3):648– 65. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst152

Trang 21 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319355 April 3, 2025 21 / 23 PLOS ONE Marine landscape and biodiversity mapping using SBRUVs and DDV 29. Moore CG, James BD. Scoping immediate priorities for new benthic marine biological survey work in Scottish territorial waters. In: Heritage SN, editor. 2011. 30. Ewers RM, Didham RK. Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to hab- itat fragmentation. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006;81(1):117–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1464793105006949 PMID: 16318651 31. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 2003;34(1):487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 32. Jackson EL, Attrill MJ, Jones MB. Habitat characteristics and spatial arrangement affecting the diversity of fish and decapod assemblages of seagrass (Zostera marina) beds around the coast of Jersey (English Channel). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2006;68(3–4):421–32. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.01.024 33. Ricart AM, Sanmartí N, Pérez M, Romero J. Multilevel assessments reveal spatially scaled land- scape patterns driving coastal fish assemblages. Mar Environ Res. 2018;140:210–20. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.06.015 PMID: 30251645 34. Kisel Y, McInnes L, Toomey NH, Orme CDL. How diversification rates and diversity limits com- bine to create large-scale species-area relationships. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1577):2514–25. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0022 PMID: 21807732

Trang 21 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

35. Gilpin M, Soulé M. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Conservation Biol- ogy: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity. 1986:19–34. 36. Collie JS, Hall SJ, Kaiser MJ, Poiner IR. A quantitative analysis of fishing impacts on shelf-sea benthos. J Anim Ecol. 2000;69(5):785–98. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00434.x PMID: 29314001 37. Collie J, Hermsen J, Valentine P, Almeida F. Effects of fishing on gravel habitats: assessment and recovery of benthic megafauna on Georges Bank. American Fisheries Society Symposium. 2005;41:325–43. 38. Thrush SF, Dayton PK. Disturbance to marine benthic habitats by trawling and dredging: implications for marine biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 2002;33(1):449–73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. ecolsys.33.010802.150515 39. Stirling DA, Boulcott P, Scott BE, Wright PJ. Using verified species distribution models to inform the conservation of a rare marine species. Diversity and Distributions. 2016;22(7):808–22. https://doi. org/10.1111/ddi.12447 40. Hall-Spencer J. Scallop dredging has profound, long-term impacts on maerl habitats. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2000;57(5):1407–15. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0918 41. Sköld M, Göransson P, Jonsson P, Bastardie F, Blomqvist M, Agrenius S, et al. Effects of chronic bot- tom trawling on soft-seafloor macrofauna in the Kattegat. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2018;586:41–55. https:// doi.org/10.3354/meps12434 42. Grieve C, Brady D, Polet H. Review of habitat dependent impacts of mobile and static fishing gears

Trang 21 · Đoạn 48Vị trí nguồn

that interact with the sea bed. Marine Stewardship Council Science Series. 2014;2:18–88. 43. Airoldi L, Beck M. Loss, status and trends for coastal marine habitats of europe. oceanography and marine biology. Oceanography and Marine Biology - An Annual Review 2007:345-405. 44. Halpern BS, Selkoe KA, Micheli F, Kappel CV. Evaluating and ranking the vulnerability of global marine ecosystems to anthropogenic threats. Conserv Biol. 2007;21(5):1301–15. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00752.x PMID: 17883495 45. Harris PT. Anthropogenic threats to benthic habitats. In: Harris PT, Baker E, editors. Seafloor Geomor- phology as Benthic Habitat GeoHab Atlas of Seafloor Geomorphic Features and Benthic Habitats. 2nd ed. Elsevier Science; 2020. p. 35-61. 46. Fletcher RJ Jr, Didham RK, Banks-Leite C, Barlow J, Ewers RM, Rosindell J, et al. Is habitat frag- mentation good for biodiversity? Biological Conservation. 2018;226:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biocon.2018.07.022 47. Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD, et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv. 2015;1(2):e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.1500052 PMID: 26601154 48. Hanski I. Habitat fragmentation and species richness. Journal of Biogeography. 2015;42(5):989–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12478 49. South Arran Nature Conservation Marine Protected Area Order; 2014. 50. Stewart BD, Howarth LM, Wood H, Whiteside K, Carney W, Crimmins É, et al. Marine Conservation

Trang 21 · Đoạn 49Vị trí nguồn

Begins at Home: How a Local Community and Protection of a Small Bay Sent Waves of Change Around the UK and Beyond. Front Mar Sci. 2020;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00076

Trang 22 · Đoạn 50Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319355 April 3, 2025 22 / 23 PLOS ONE Marine landscape and biodiversity mapping using SBRUVs and DDV 51. Natureseot. Scottish MPA Project Management Options: South Arran Possible MPA. 2014. 52. Scottish Natural Heritage. Scottish MPA Project Management Options: South Arran Possible MPA. 2014. 53. QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System. 2014. 54. SeaGIS Ltd. EventMeasure. 5.61 ed. Australia; 2019. 55. Morris-Webb ES, Stamp TS. Biological analyses of underwater video footage from arran, loch linnhe, loch shell and loch seaforth. Journal Name or Book Title. 2015; https://doi.org/DOIorotheridentifiers 56. O’Dell J, Bulgakova A, Amos W, Dewey S. Biological analyses of seabed imagery from within and around loch alsh, loch carron, wester ross, small isles and south arran marine protected areas in 2018. 2020;56:1–50. 57. Coggan R, Mitchell A, White J, Golding N. Recommended operating guidelines (ROG) for underwater video and photographic imaging techniques. MESH. 2007; https://doi.org/DOIorIdentifier 58. Hitchin R, Tuner JA, Verling E. Epibiota Remote Monitoring from Digital Imagery: Operational Guide- lines. JNCC; 2015. 59. SeaGIS Ltd. CAL. 3.30 ed. Australia; 2020. 60. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 4.2.2 ed. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022. 61. Mitchell S, Reeve R, White T. Rdiversity. R package version 2.0. Glasgow; 2020. 62. Hiemstra P, Pebesma E, Twenhofel C, Heuvelink G. Real-time automatic interpolation of ambient

Trang 22 · Đoạn 51Vị trí nguồn

gamma dose rates from the dutch radioactivity monitoring network. Computers and Geosciences. 2008;35(8):1711–21. 63. Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B. Rgdal: Bindings for the ‘Geospatial’ Data Abstraction Library. R pack- age version 1.6-7. 2023. 64. Bivand R, Rundel C. Rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine - Open Source (‘GEOS’). 2023. 65. Pebesma E. Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Computers and Geosciences. 2004;30(7):683–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.012 66. Hijmans RJ. Geosphere: Spherical Trigonometry. R package version 1.5-14 ed. 2023. 67. Hijmans R. Raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 3.6-26 ed. 2023. 68. Akima H, Gebhardt A, Petzoldt T, Maechler M. Akima: Interpolation of Irregularly Spaced Data. R package version 0.6-3.7 ed. 2023. 69. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Verlag, New York: Springer; 2016. 70. Kassambara A. rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. R package version 0.7.2 ed. 2023. 71. Graves S, Piepho HP, Selzer L, Dorai-Raj S. multcompView: Visualizations of Paired Comparisons. R package version 0.1-8 ed. 2019. 72. Van der Wal J, Falconi L, Januchowski S, Shoo L, Storlie C. SDMTools: Species Distribution Mod- elling Tools: Tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. R package version 1.1-221 ed. 2014. 73. Milne BT. Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Applied Mathematics and Computation. 1988;27(1):67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(88)90099-9

Trang 22 · Đoạn 52Vị trí nguồn

74. O’Neill R, Krummel J, Gardner R, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis D. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology. 1988;1(3):153–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00162741 75. St. Pierre JI, Kovalenko KE. Effect of habitat complexity attributes on species richness. Ecosphere. 2014;5(2). https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00323.1 76. Jacob C, van Bochove J, Livingstone S, White T, Pilgrim J, Bennun L. Marine biodiversity offsets: pragmatic approaches toward better conservation outcomes. Conservation Letters. 2020;13(3). https:// doi.org/10.1111/conl.12711 77. Gill DA, Mascia MB, Ahmadia GN, Glew L, Lester SE, Barnes M, et al. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature. 2017;543(7647):665–9. https://doi. org/10.1038/nature21708 PMID: 28329771 78. Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Willis TJ, Kininmonth S, Baker SC, Banks S, et al. Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature. 2014;506(7487):216–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13022 PMID: 24499817 79. Pace MC, Bailey DM, Donnan DW, Narayanaswamy BE, Smith HJ, Speirs DC, et al. Modelling seabed sediment physical properties and organic matter content in the Firth of Clyde. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2021;13(12):5847–66. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5847-2021

Trang 23 · Đoạn 53Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319355 April 3, 2025 23 / 23 PLOS ONE Marine landscape and biodiversity mapping using SBRUVs and DDV 80. Moore CH, Van Niel K, Harvey ES. The effect of landscape composition and configuration on the spatial distribution of temperate demersal fish. Ecography. 2010;34(3):425–35. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06436.x 81. Bologna PAX, Heck KL. Impact of habitat edges on density and secondary production of seagrass- associated fauna. Estuaries. 2002;25(5):1033–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02691350 82. Gorman AM, Gregory RS, Schneider DC. Eelgrass patch size and proximity to the patch edge affect predation risk of recently settled age 0 cod (Gadus). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2009;371(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2008.12.008 83. Laurel B, Gregory R, Brown J. Settlement and distribution of Age-0 juvenile cod, Gadus morhua and G. ogac, following a large-scale habitat manipulation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2003;262:241–52. https:// doi.org/10.3354/meps262241 84. Hall-Spencer J, White N, Gillespie E, Gillham K, Foggo A. Impact of fish farms on maerl beds in strongly tidal areas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006;326:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps326001 85. Kamenos N, Moore P, Hall-Spencer J. Nursery-area function of maerl grounds for juvenile queen scallops aequipecten opercularis and other invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2004;274:183–9. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps274183 86. Kamenos N, Moore P, Hall-Spencer J. Small-scale distribution of juvenile gadoids in shallow inshore

Trang 23 · Đoạn 54Vị trí nguồn

waters; what role does maerl play?. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2004;61(3):422–9. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2004.02.004 87. Kaiser M, Collie J, Hall S, Jennings S, Poiner I. Modification of marine habitats by trawl- ing activities: prognosis and solutions. Fish and Fisheries. 2002;3(2):114–36. https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00079.x 88. Kamenos N, Moore P, Hall-Spencer J. Substratum heterogeneity of dredged vs un-dredged maerl grounds. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2003;83(3):411–3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315403007264 89. Dorenbosch M, Grol M, Nagelkerken I, van der Velde G. Distribution of coral reef fishes along a coral reef-seagrass gradient: edge effects and habitat segregation. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005;299:277–88. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps299277 90. Gratwicke B, Speight MR. The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. Journal of Fish Biology. 2005;66(3):650–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00629.x 91. Nagelkerken I, Dorenbosch M, Verberk W, Cocheret de la Morinière E, van der Velde G. Importance of shallow-water biotopes of a caribbean bay for juvenile coral reef fishes: patterns in biotope associ- ation, community structure and spatial distribution. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2000;202:175–92. https://doi. org/10.3354/meps202175 92. Jac C, Desroy N, Certain G, Foveau A, Labrune C, Vaz S. Detecting adverse effect on seabed integ-

Trang 23 · Đoạn 55Vị trí nguồn

rity. Part 1: Generic sensitivity indices to measure the effect of trawling on benthic mega-epifauna. Ecological Indicators. 2020;117:106631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106631