Phenological cycles in the Pantanal woody communities: Responses to climate and soil moisture seasonality

66. Batalha MA, Martins FR. Reproductive phenology of the cerrado plant community in Emas National Park (central Brazil). Aust J Bot. 2004; 52: 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT03098 67. Kovach WL. Oriana for Windows. Pentraeth, UK: Kovach Computer Services.; 1994. 68. Bendix J, Homeier J, Cueva Ortiz E, Emck P. Seasonality of weather and tree phenology in a tropical evergreen mountain rain forest Plant-Soil Systems: Interactions and Feedbacks View project Nature 4.0 | Sensing Biodiversity View project. Article in International Journal of Biometeorology. 2006 [cited 16 Aug 2022]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-006-0029-8 PMID: 16598482 69. Pires JPA, Marino NAC, Silva AG, Rodrigues PJFP, Freitas L. Tree community phenodynamics and Its relationship with climatic conditions in a lowland tropical rainforest. Forests. 2018; 9: 114. https:// doi.org/10.3390/F9030114 70. Perina BB, Liboni AP, Montanher DR, Messetti AVL, Pimenta JA, Bianchini E. Phenology of the tree community in a seasonal forest in southern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Botany 2019 42:3. 2019; 42: 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40415-019-00545-Y 71. Agência Nacional De A´ guas–ANA. Hidroweb: Sistemas de informac¸ões hidrolo´gicas. In: ANA [Inter- net]. 26 Nov 2018 [cited 18 Nov 2018]. Available: http://hidroweb.ana.gov.br/ 72. INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE METEOROLOGIA—INMET. Normais Climatolo´ gicas do Brasil. [cited 3 Aug 2024]. Available: https://portal.inmet.gov.br/ normais 73. Salis SM, Lehn CR, Mattos PP, Bergier I, Crispim SMA. Root behavior of savanna species in Brazil’s

Pantanal wetland. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2014; 2: 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.009 74. Shivaprakash KN, Ramesh BR, Umashaanker R, Dayanandan S. Functional trait and community phy- logenetic analyses reveal environmental filtering as the major determinant of assembly of tropical for- est tree communities in the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot in India. For Ecosyst. 2018; 5: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40663-018-0144-0/FIGURES/5 75. Pott A, Pott JV. Vegetac¸ão do Pantanal: fitogeografia e dinaˆ mica. Anais do 2o Simpo´ sio de Geotecno- logias no Pantanal. Corumba´ : Embrapa Informa´tica Agropecua´ ria/INPE; 2009. pp. 1065–1076. 76. Neves SPS, Mendes dos Santos MG, Vito´ ria AP, Rossatto DR, de Miranda L d AP, Funch LS. The roles of functional traits in canopy maintenance along a savanna/seasonally dry tropical forest gradient in northeastern Brazil. Flora: Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants. 2022; 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FLORA.2022.152090 77. Nunes da Cunha C, Junk WJ, Leitão-Filho HF. Woody vegetation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Bra- zil: a preliminary typology. Amazoniana. 2007; 19: 159–184. 78. Wagner FH, He´rault B, Rossi V, Hilker T, Maeda EE, Sanchez A, et al. Climate drivers of the Amazon forest greening. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0180932. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180932 PMID: 28708897 79. Cabral OMR, da Rocha HR, Gash JH, Freitas HC, Ligo MAV. Water and energy fluxes from a wood- land savanna (cerrado) in southeast Brazil. J Hydrol Reg Stud. 2015; 4: 22–40. https://doi.org/10. 1016/J.EJRH.2015.04.010

80. da Silva JB, Valle Junior LCG, Faria TO, Marques JB, Dalmagro HJ, Nogueira JS, et al. Temporal vari- ability in evapotranspiration and energy partitioning over a seasonally flooded scrub forest of the Bra- zilian Pantanal. Agric For Meteorol. 2021; 308–309: 108559. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET. 2021.108559 81. Dalmagro HJ, de A. Lobo F, Vourlitis GL, Dalmolin Aˆ C, Antunes MZ, Ortı´z CER, et al. Photosynthetic response of a wetland- and an upland-adapted tree species to seasonal variations in hydrology in the Brazilian Cerrado and Pantanal. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 2016 38:5. 2016; 38: 1–10. https://doi. org/10.1007/S11738-016-2125-7 82. Wright CL, de Lima ALA, de Souza ES, West JB, Wilcox BP. Plant functional types broadly describe water use strategies in the Caatinga, a seasonally dry tropical forest in northeast Brazil. Ecol Evol. 2021; 11: 11808–11825. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7949 PMID: 34522343 83. Scho¨ ngart J, Piedade MTF, Ludwigshausen S, Horna V, Worbes M. Phenology and stem-growth peri- odicity of tree species in Amazonian floodplain forests. J Trop Ecol. 2002; 18: 581–597. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0266467402002389 84. Parolin P, Wittmann F. Struggle in the flood: tree responses to flooding stress in four tropical floodplain systems. AoB Plants. 2010; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plq003 PMID: 22476061 85. Parolin P, Lucas C, Piedade MTF, Wittmann F. Drought responses of flood-tolerant trees in Amazo- nian floodplains. Ann Bot. 2010; 105: 129. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp258 PMID: 19880423

86. Oliveira AKM, Gualtieri SCJ. Trocas gasosas em plantas jovens de Tabebuia aurea (Bignoniaceae Juss.) submetidas a estresse por alagamento. Revista Arvore. 2016; 40: 39–49. https://doi.org/10. 1590/0100-67622016000100005 PLOS ONE Phenological cycles in the Pantanal woody communities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316011 February 7, 2025 27 / 30