Practice makes the expert: The importance of training volunteers in the generation of phenological data from photographs of biodiversity observation platforms
pmc-PMC9990930.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 17 trang
Agreement among Multiple Observers. Biometrics. 1977. PMID: 884196 50. Kosmala M, Wiggins A, Swanson A, Simmons B. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Front Ecol Environ [Internet]. 2016 Dec 1; 14(10):551–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1436 51. Feldman RE, Zˇ emaitė I, Miller-Rushing AJ. How training citizen scientists affects the accuracy and pre- cision of phenological data. Int J Biometeorol [Internet]. 2018; 62(8):1421–35. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-1540-4 PMID: 29732472 52. Kremen C, Ullman KS, Thorp RW. Evaluating the Quality of Citizen-Scientist Data on Pollinator Com- munities. Conserv Biol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01657.x PMID: 21507061 53. Cooper CB, Dickinson J, Phillips T, Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc. 2007. 54. Lindsay A. Turnbull MR and MJC. Turnbull et al. 1999. J Ecol [Internet]. 1999;87(5):899–912. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2648645.pdf?casa_token=jh3Jnd2YXygAAAAA: p0MOrl0iph48MEWcE9fO-LcwDqMLKoUDe-0Ip3T_kKIaqWt6mtvaN7jHu0lXi-O- qG2sT4vWcd8xOPspnEvJzkPvD-yJlCng7HuNXpfD7vTBKCf8bF7z. 55. Taylor SD, Meiners JM, Riemer K, Orr MC, White EP. Comparison of large-scale citizen science data and long-term study data for phenology modeling. Ecology. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2568 PMID: 30499218 56. Willis CG, Law E, Williams AC, Franzone BF, Bernardos R, Bruno L, et al. CrowdCurio: an online crowd- sourcing platform to facilitate climate change studies using herbarium specimens. New Phytol. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14535 PMID: 28394023 57. Geoghegan H, Dyke A, Pateman R, West S, Everett G. Understanding motivations for citizen science. UkeofOrgUk. 2016. 58. Phenology Mayer A. and Citizen Science: Volunteers have documented seasonal events for more than a century, and scientific studies are benefiting from the data. Bioscience [Internet]. 2010 Mar 1; 60 (3):172–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2010.60.3.3 59. Bonney R, Shirk JL, Phillips TB, Wiggins A, Ballard HL, Miller-Rushing AJ, et al. Next steps for citizen science. Science. 2014. 60. Project Socientize. Green paper on Citizen Science. Citizen Science for Europe: Towards a society of empowered citizens and enhanced research. Socientize. 2013. 61. McDonough MacKenzie C, Gallinat AS, Zipf L. Low-cost observations and experiments return a high value in plant phenology research. Applications in Plant Sciences. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3. 11338 PMID: 32351799 62. Schmidt-Lebuhn AN, Knerr NJ, Kessler M. Non-geographic collecting biases in herbarium specimens of Australian daisies (Asteraceae). Biodivers Conserv. 2013. 63. Rich TCG, Woodruff ER. Recording bias in botanical surveys. Watsonia. 1992. 64. Meyer C, Weigelt P, Kreft H. Multidimensional biases, gaps and uncertainties in global plant occurrence information. Ecology letters. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12624 PMID: 27250865 PLOS ONE The training of volunteers as a promoter of phenological studies PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282750 March 7, 2023 16 / 17
65. Courter JR, Johnson RJ, Stuyck CM, Lang BA, Kaiser EW. Weekend bias in Citizen Science data reporting: implications for phenology studies. Int J Biometeorol [Internet]. 2013; 57(5):715–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-012-0598-7 PMID: 23104424 66. Courter JR, Johnson RJ, Stuyck CM, Lang BA, Kaiser EW. Weekend bias in Citizen Science data reporting: Implications for phenology studies. Int J Biometeorol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484- 012-0598-7 PMID: 23104424 67. Willis CG, Ellwood ER, Primack RB, Davis CC, Pearson KD, Gallinat AS, et al. Old Plants, New Tricks: Phenological Research Using Herbarium Specimens. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2017. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.015 PMID: 28465044 68. Panchen ZA, Doubt J, Kharouba HM, Johnston MO. Patterns and biases in an Arctic herbarium speci- men collection: Implications for phenological research. Appl Plant Sci [Internet]. 2019 Mar 1; 7(3): e01229. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1229 PMID: 30937221 69. Callaghan CT, Poore AGB, Mesaglio T, Moles AT, Nakagawa S, Roberts C, et al. Three Frontiers for the Future of Biodiversity Research Using Citizen Science Data. Bioscience. 2021; 71(1):55–63. 70. Kelling S, Fink D, La Sorte FA, Johnston A, Bruns NE, Hochachka WM. Taking a ‘Big Data’ approach to data quality in a citizen science project. Ambio. 2015. PLOS ONE The training of volunteers as a promoter of phenological studies PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282750 March 7, 2023 17 / 17