Practice makes the expert: The importance of training volunteers in the generation of phenological data from photographs of biodiversity observation platforms

18. Chung U, Mack L, Yun JI, Kim SH. Predicting the timing of cherry blossoms in washington, dc and mid- atlantic states in response to climate change. PLoS One. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0027439 PMID: 22087317 19. Buckley LB, Foushee MS. Footprints of climate change in US national park visitation. Int J Biometeorol. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-011-0508-4 PMID: 22109104 20. Fitzpatrick L, Giambuzzi PJ, Spreitzer A, Reidy B, Still SM, Rollinson CR. Improving phenology predic- tions for sparsely observed species through fusion of botanical collections and citizen-science. Clim Chang Ecol. 2021. 21. Basler D. Evaluating phenological models for the prediction of leaf-out dates in six temperate tree spe- cies across central Europe. Agric For Meteorol [Internet]. 2016; 217:10–21. Available from: https:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192315007583. 22. Zhang X, Friedl MA, Schaaf CB, Strahler AH, Hodges JCF, Gao F, et al. Monitoring vegetation phenol- ogy using MODIS. Remote Sens Environ. 2003. 23. Fuccillo KK, Crimmins TM, de Rivera CE, Elder TS. Assessing accuracy in citizen science-based plant phenology monitoring. Int J Biometeorol [Internet]. 2015; 59(7):917–26. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00484-014-0892-7 PMID: 25179528 24. Iwanycki Ahlstrand N, Primack RB, Tøttrup AP. A comparison of herbarium and citizen science phenol- ogy datasets for detecting response of flowering time to climate change in Denmark. Int J Biometeorol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02238-w PMID: 35235036

25. Haklay M, Do¨rler D, Heigl F, Manzoni M, Hecker S, Vohland K. What Is Citizen Science? The Chal- lenges of Definition. In: The Science of Citizen Science. 2021. 26. MacPhail VJ, Colla SR. Power of the people: A review of citizen science programs for conservation. Bio- logical Conservation. 2020. 27. Lepczyk CA. Integrating published data and citizen science to describe bird diversity across a land- scape. J Appl Ecol. 2005. 28. Dujardin S, Stas M, Van Eupen C, Aerts R, Hendrickx M, Delcloo AW, et al. Mapping abundance distri- butions of allergenic tree species in urbanized landscapes: A nation-wide study for Belgium using forest inventory and citizen science data. Landsc Urban Plan [Internet]. 2022; 218:104286. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204621002498. 29. Bruno S, Tristan D, Fre´ de´ ric Y, Lize´ A, Eric F. Small- and large-scale processes including anthropo- genic pressures as drivers of gastropod communities in the NE Atlantic coast: A citizen science based approach. Sci Total Environ [Internet]. 2021;151600. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S004896972106678X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151600 PMID: 34774947 30. Connors JP, Lei S, Kelly M. Citizen Science in the Age of Neogeography: Utilizing Volunteered Geo- graphic Information for Environmental Monitoring. Ann Assoc Am Geogr [Internet]. 2012 Nov 1; 102 (6):1267–89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.627058

31. Thiemann HB, Norton AJ, Dickinson HJ, Mcmaster A, Kolb UC. SuperWASP variable stars: Classifying light curves using citizen science. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2021. 32. Schwartz MD. Green-wave phenology [4]. Nature. 1998. 33. Taylor SD, White EP. Automated data-intensive forecasting of plant phenology throughout the United States. Ecol Appl. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2025 PMID: 31630468 34. Preve´ y JS, Parker LE, Harrington CA. Projected impacts of climate change on the range and phenology of three culturally-important shrub species. PLoS One. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0232537 PMID: 32384124 35. Denny EG, Gerst KL, Miller-Rushing AJ, Tierney GL, Crimmins TM, Enquist CAF, et al. Standardized phenology monitoring methods to track plant and animal activity for science and resource management applications. Int J Biometeorol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0789-5 PMID: 24458770 36. Templ B, Koch E, Bolmgren K, Ungersbo¨ ck M, Paul A, Scheifinger H, et al. Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data. Int J Biometeorol. 2018. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00484-018-1512-8 PMID: 29455297 37. Calixto-Pe´rez E, Alarco´ n-Guerrero J, Ramos-Ferna´ndez G, Dias PAD, Rangel-Negrı´n A, Ame´ ndola- Pimenta M, et al. Integrating expert knowledge and ecological niche models to estimate Mexican pri- mates’ distribution. Primates. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-018-0673-8 PMID: 29987701 38. Osorio-Rodriguez AN, Va´ zquez-Arroyo E, Almaza´n-Catala´n JA, Uriostegui D, Jua´ rez- Agis J-A, Garzo´n

Lo´ pez LA. Current distribution of the Mexican hairy dwarf porcupine, Sphiggurus mexicanus, in Guer- rero, Me´ xico. Therya notes. 2021. 39. Castañeda S, Botello F, Sa´nchez-Cordero V, Sarkar S. Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Monarch But- terflies Along Their Migratory Route. Front Ecol Evol. 2019. PLOS ONE The training of volunteers as a promoter of phenological studies PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282750 March 7, 2023 15 / 17