Measuring epistemic success of a biodiversity citizen science program: A citation study

38. Jose V S, Nameer PO. The expanding distribution of the Indian Peafowl (Pavo cristatus) as an indicator of changing climate in Kerala, southern India: A modelling study using MaxEnt. Ecological Indicators. 2020; 110: 105930 39. Cooper CB, Shirk J, Zuckerberg B. The invisible prevalence of citizen science in global research: migra- tory birds and climate change. PloS One. 2014; 9(9):e106508. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0106508 PMID: 25184755 40. Guerrini CJ, Majumder MA, Lewellyn MJ, McGuire AL. Citizen science, public policy. Science. 2018; 361(6398):134–136. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8379 PMID: 30002244 41. Wehn U, Collins K, Anema K, Basco-Carrera L, Lerebours A. Stakeholder engagement in water gover- nance as social learning: lessons from practice. Water Int. 2018; 43(1):34–59. 42. Riesch H, Potter C. Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Underst Sci. 2014; 23(1):107–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513497324 PMID: 23982281 43. Escribano N, Galicia D, Ariño AH. The tragedy of the biodiversity data commons: a data impediment creeping nigher? Database. 2018;2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bay033 PMID: 29688384 44. Faith D, Collen B, Ariño A, Koleff PKP, Guinotte J, Kerr J, et al. Bridging the biodiversity data gaps: Rec- ommendations to meet users’ data needs. Biodivers Inform. 2013; 8(2). PLOS ONE A citation study of a biodiversity citizen science program PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258350 October 11, 2021 13 / 13