Repetition increases belief in climate-skeptical claims, even for climate science endorsers

51. De keersmaecker J, Dunning D, Pennycook G, Rand DG, Sanchez C, Unkelbach C, et al. Investigating the Robustness of the Illusory Truth Effect Across Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Cognitive Style. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Feb 1; 46(2):204–15. https://doi. org/10.1177/0146167219853844 PMID: 31179863 52. Newman EJ, Jalbert MC, Schwarz N, Ly DP. Truthiness, the illusory truth effect, and the role of need for cognition. Conscious Cogn. 2020 Feb 1; 78:102866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102866 PMID: 31935624 53. Lodge M, Taber CS. The Rationalizing Voter. Cambridge University Press; 2013. 301 p. 54. Achen C, Bartels L. Democracy for realists: Holding up a mirror to the electorate. Juncture. 2016; 22 (4):269–75. 55. Flynn DJ, Nyhan B, Reifler J. The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics. Polit Psychol. 2017; 38(S1):127–50. 56. Ditto PH, Liu BS, Clark CJ, Wojcik SP, Chen EE, Grady RH, et al. At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta- Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar 1; 14(2):273–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617746796 PMID: 29851554 57. Cotter RG, Lodge M, Vidigal R. The Boundary Conditions of Motivated Reasoning. In: Suhay E, Grof- man B, Trechsel AH, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion. Oxford University Press; 2020. p. 65–87. 58. de Hoog N. Processing of Social Identity Threats A Defense Motivation Perspective. Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan 1; 44:361.

59. Correll J, Spencer SJ, Zanna MP. An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2004 May 1; 40(3):350–6. 60. Cohen GL, Sherman DK, Bastardi A, Hsu L, McGoey M, Ross L. Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affir- mation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007; 93(3):415–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.415 PMID: 17723057 61. Treen KM d’ I., Williams HTP, O’Neill SJ. Online misinformation about climate change. WIREs Clim Change. 2020; 11(5):e665. 62. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM. Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Glob Environ Change. 2004 Jul 1; 14(2):125–36. 63. McAllister L, Daly M, Chandler P, McNatt M, Benham A, Boykoff M. Balance as bias, resolute on the retreat? Updates & analyses of newspaper coverage in the United States, United Kingdom, New Zea- land, Australia and Canada over the past 15 years. Environ Res Lett. 2021 Aug; 16(9):094008. 64. Grundmann R, Krishnamurthy R. The discourse of climate change: a corpus-based approach. Crit Approaches Discourse Anal Discip. 2010 Sep; 4(2):125–46. 65. Henderson EL, Simons DJ, Barr DJ. The Trajectory of Truth: A Longitudinal Study of the Illusory Truth Effect. J Cogn. 2021; 4(1):29. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.161 PMID: 34164597 66. Fazio LK, Pillai RM, Patel D. The effects of repetition on belief in naturalistic settings. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Oct; 151(10):2604–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001211 PMID: 35286116

67. Hassan A, Barber SJ. The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 13; 6(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00301-5 PMID: 33983553 68. Peterson E, Iyengar S. Partisan Gaps in Political Information and Information-Seeking Behavior: Moti- vated Reasoning or Cheerleading? Am J Polit Sci. 2021; 65(1):133–47. 69. Zappalà G. Drought Exposure and Accuracy: Motivated Reasoning in Climate Change Beliefs. Environ Resour Econ. 2023 Aug 1; 85(3):649–72. PLOS ONE Illusory truth effect for climate-skeptical claims PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307294 August 7, 2024 19 / 19