Repetition increases belief in climate-skeptical claims, even for climate science endorsers

28. Gawronski B, Strack F. Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition. Guilford Press; 2012. 514 p. 29. Kahan DM. Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgm Decis Mak. 2013 Jul; 8 (4):407–24. 30. Kahan DM. Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem. Polit Psychol. 2015; 36 (S1):1–43. 31. Jost JT, Hennes EP, Lavine H. “Hot” Political Cognition: Its Self-, Group-, and System-Serving Pur- poses. In: Carlston D, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition. Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 851–75. 32. Taber CS, Cann D, Kucsova S. The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments. Polit Behav. 2009 Jun 1; 31(2):137–55. 33. Strickland AA, Taber CS, Lodge M. Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Dec 1; 36(6):935–44. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-1460524 PMID: 22232418 34. Erisen C, Redlawsk DP, Erisen E. Challenging people’s political views and values makes them think even harder and produce better arguments to defend themselves [Internet]. USApp - American Politics and Policy Blog. London School of Economics and Political Science; 2017 [cited 2023 Jun 9]. Available from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2017/09/22/challenging-peoples-political-views-and-values- makes-them-think-even-harder-and-produce-better-arguments-to-defend-themselves/ 35. Petty RE, Briñol P. The elaboration likelihood model. In: Handbook of theories of social psychology, Vol 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd; 2012. p. 224–45.

36. Drummond C, Siegrist M, A´ rvai J. Limited effects of exposure to fake news about climate change. Envi- ron Res Commun. 2020 Aug; 2(8):081003. 37. Kahne J, Bowyer B. Educating for Democracy in a Partisan Age: Confronting the Challenges of Moti- vated Reasoning and Misinformation. Am Educ Res J. 2017 Feb 1; 54(1):3–34. 38. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change. In: Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1995. p. 413–32. (Ohio State University series on attitudes and persuasion, Vol. 4.). 39. Howe LC, Krosnick JA. Attitude Strength. Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3; 68(1):327–51. https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600 PMID: 27618943 40. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May 1; 39(2):175–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146 PMID: 17695343 41. Hauser DJ, Moss AJ, Rosenzweig C, Jaffe SN, Robinson J, Litman L. Evaluating CloudResearch’s Approved Group as a solution for problematic data quality on MTurk. Behav Res Methods. 2022 Nov 3;1–12. 42. Hauser DJ, Schwarz N. Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar 1; 48(1):400–7. https://doi.org/10. 3758/s13428-015-0578-z PMID: 25761395 43. Corp IBM. IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2021.

44. Chryst B, Marlon J, van der Linden S, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C. Global Warming’s “Six Americas Short Survey”: Audience Segmentation of Climate Change Views Using a Four Question Instrument. Environ Commun. 2018 Nov 17; 12(8):1109–22. 45. Uanhoro J. Effect Size Calculators [Internet]. Effect Size Calculators. 2017 [cited 2023 Jun 10]. Avail- able from: https://effect-size-calculator.herokuapp.com/ 46. Farias M, Newheiser AK, Kahane G, de Toledo Z. Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov 1; 49(6):1210–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jesp.2013.05.008 PMID: 24187384 47. Schwarz N, Sanna LJ, Skurnik I, Yoon C. Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting Peo- ple Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns. In: Advances in Experimen- tal Social Psychology. Elsevier; 2007. p. 127–61. 48. Unkelbach C, Greifeneder R. Experiential fluency and declarative advice jointly inform judgments of truth. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2018 Nov; 79:78–86. 49. Song H, Schwarz N. If It’s Hard to Read, It’s Hard to Do: Processing Fluency Affects Effort Prediction and Motivation. Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct 1; 19(10):986–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008. 02189.x PMID: 19000208 50. Bild E, Redman A, Newman EJ, Muir BR, Tait D, Schwarz N. Sound and credibility in the virtual court: Low audio quality leads to less favorable evaluations of witnesses and lower weighting of evidence. Law Hum Behav. 2021; 45(5):481–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000466 PMID: 34871019

PLOS ONE Illusory truth effect for climate-skeptical claims PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307294 August 7, 2024 18 / 19