Repetition increases belief in climate-skeptical claims, even for climate science endorsers

2. Dechêne A, Stahl C, Hansen J, Wa¨ nke M. The Truth About the Truth: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Truth Effect. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 May 1; 14(2):238–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1088868309352251 PMID: 20023210 3. Boykoff MT, Mansfield M. ‘Ye Olde Hot Aire’*: reporting on human contributions to climate change in the UK tabloid press. Environ Res Lett. 2008 Apr; 3(2):024002. 4. Objectivity Fahy D., Balance False, and Advocacy in News Coverage of Climate Change. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. 2017. 5. Imundo MN, Rapp DN. When fairness is flawed: Effects of false balance reporting and weight-of-evi- dence statements on beliefs and perceptions of climate change. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2022; 11 (2):258–71. 6. Schwarz N. Metacognition. In: APA handbook of personality and social psychology. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2015. p. 203–29. 7. Schwarz N, Jalbert M, Noah T, Zhang L. Metacognitive experiences as information: Processing fluency in consumer judgment and decision making. Consum Psychol Rev. 2021; 4(1):4–25. 8. Schwarz N, Newman E, Leach W. Making the truth stick & the myths fade: Lessons from cognitive psy- chology. Behav Sci Policy. 2016; 2(1):85–95. 9. Forster K, Davis C. Repetition and frequency attenuation in lexical access. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1984 Oct 1; 10:680–98. 10. Schwarz N. Feelings-as-Information Theory. In: Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012. p. 289–308.

11. Unkelbach C, Rom SC. A referential theory of the repetition-induced truth effect. Cognition. 2017 Mar 1; 160:110–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.016 PMID: 28088712 12. Hasher L, Goldstein D, Toppino T. Frequency and the conference of referential validity. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav. 1977 Feb 1; 16(1):107–12. 13. Reber R, Schwarz N. Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth. Conscious Cogn. 1999 Sep 1; 8(3):338–42. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386 PMID: 10487787 14. Schwarz N. Of fluency, beauty, and truth: Inferences from metacognitive experiences. In: Metacognitive Diversity: An Interdisciplinary Approach. 2017. 15. Schwarz N, Jalbert M. When (fake) news feels true: Intuitions of truth and the acceptance and correction of misinformation. In: The psychology of fake news. New York, NY, US: Routledge; 2020. p. 73–89. 16. Henderson EL, Westwood SJ, Simons DJ. A reproducible systematic map of research on the illusory truth effect. Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun 1; 29(3):1065–88. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01995-w PMID: 34708397 17. Fazio LK, Rand DG, Pennycook G. Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct 1; 26(5):1705–10. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423- 019-01651-4 PMID: 31420808 18. Nadarevic L, Aßfalg A. Unveiling the truth: warnings reduce the repetition-based truth effect. Psychol Res. 2017 Jul 1; 81(4):814–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0777-y PMID: 27318939

19. Jalbert M, Newman E, Schwarz N. Only Half of What I’ll Tell You is True: Expecting to Encounter False- hoods Reduces Illusory Truth. J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2020 Dec 1; 9(4):602–13. 20. Begg IM, Anas A, Farinacci S. Dissociation of Processes in Belief: Source Recollection, Statement Familiarity, and the Illusion of Truth. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1992; 121(4):446–58. 21. Henkel LA, Mattson ME. Reading is believing: The truth effect and source credibility. Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec 1; 20(4):1705–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.018 PMID: 21978908 22. Bacon F. Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1979 Jan 1; 5:241–52. 23. Arkes HR, Hackett C, Boehm L. The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. J Behav Decis Mak. 1989; 2(2):81–94. 24. Roggeveen AL, Johar GV. Perceived Source Variability Versus Familiarity: Testing Competing Expla- nations for the Truth Effect. J Consum Psychol. 2002; 12(2):81–91. 25. Johar GV, Roggeveen AL. Changing False Beliefs from Repeated Advertising: The Role of Claim-Refu- tation Alignment. J Consum Psychol. 2007; 17(2):118–27. 26. Moons WG, Mackie DM, Garcia-Marques T. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009; 96(1):32–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0013461 PMID: 19210062 27. Pennycook G, Cannon TD, Rand DG. Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec; 147(12):1865–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465 PMID: 30247057 PLOS ONE

Illusory truth effect for climate-skeptical claims PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307294 August 7, 2024 17 / 19