Surf smelt accelerate usage of endogenous energy reserves under climate change

47. Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team (PSWQAT) (2002) 2002 Puget Sound Update: Eighth Report of the Puget Sound. Ambient Monitoring Program. Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team. Olympia, Washington 48. Mauger G, Casola J, Morgan H, Strauch R, Jones B, Curry B, et al (2015) State of Knowledge: Climate Change in Puget Sound. Report prepared for the Puget Sound Partnership and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, Seattle 49. Esbaugh A (2018) Physiological implications of ocean acidification for marine fish: emerging patterns and new insights. J Comp Physiol B 188:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-017-1105-6 PMID: 28547292 50. Horn M, Martin K, Chotkowski M (1999) Intertidal fishes: life in two worlds. San Diego, California 51. Smyder E, Martin K (2002) Temperature effects on egg survival and hatching during the extended incu- bation period of California grunion, Leuresthes tenuis. Copeia 2:313–320. https://doi.org/10.1643/ 0045-8511(2002)002[0313:TEOESA]2.0.CO;2 52. Baumann H (2019). Experimental assessments of marine species sensitivities to ocean acidification and co-stressors: How far have we come? 1. Can J Zool 97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006. tb01204.x 53. Samish Indian Nation Department of Natural Resources (2019) Fidalgo Bay Water Quality Data Sum- mary Report: 2005–2018 54. Busch D, Harvey C, McElhany P (2013) Potential impacts of ocean acidification on the Puget Sound food web. ICES J Mar Sci 70: 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst061 PLOS ONE

Surf smelt response to climate co-stressors PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270491 June 27, 2022 14 / 14