Thông tin tài nguyên

Promoting Pro-environmental Beliefs and Behaviour: Choose-Your-Own Story Futuristic Climate Game

pmc-PMC11957362.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 18 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 18 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317773 March 31, 2025 18 / 18 PLOS ONE Promoting Pro-environmental Beliefs and Behaviour 19. Palosaari E, Herne K, Lappalainen O, Hietanen J. Effects of fear on donations to climate change mitigation. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2023;104:104422. 20. Skurka C, Niederdeppe J, Romero-Canyas R, Acup D. Pathways of influence in emotional appeals: benefits and tradeoffs of using fear or humor to promote climate change-related intentions and risk perceptions. J Commun. 2018;68(1):169–93. 21. Ojala M. Hope and climate-change engagement from a psychological perspective. Curr Opin Psychol. 2023;49:101514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101514 PMID: 36502586 22. Adida CL, Lo A, Platas MR. Perspective taking can promote short-term inclusionary behavior toward Syrian refugees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(38):9521–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1804002115 PMID: 30181296 23. Muradova L, Arceneaux K. Reflective political reasoning: political disagreement and empathy. Eur J Polit Res. 2022;61(3):740–61. 24. Muradova L. Empathy and Political Reasoning: How Empathy Promotes Reflection and Strengthens Democracy. Cambridge University Press; 2025. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009643573 25. Simonovits G, Kezdi G, Kardos P. Seeing the world through the other’s eye: an online intervention reducing ethnic prejudice. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2018;112(1):186–93. 26. Talgorn E, Ullerup H. Invoking ‘empathy for the planet’ through participatory ecological storytelling:

Trang 18 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

From human-centered to planet-centered design. Sustainability. 2023;15(10):7794. 27. Tatebe K, Shaw A, Sheppard SRJ. Technical report on local climate change visioning for Delta: Find- ings and recommendations. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia; 2010. 28. Todd A, Galinsky A. Perspective-taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evi- dence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2014;8(7). https://doi.org/ DOIORIDENTIFIER 29. Andrews T, Delton A, Kline R. Climate games: experiments on how people prevent disaster. University of Michigan Press; 2024. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12089759 30. Gustafson A, Ballew M, Goldberg M, Cutler M, Rosenthal S, Leiserowitz A. Personal stories can shift climate change beliefs and risk perceptions: the mediating role of emotion. Commun Rep. 2020;33(3): 31. Lujala P, Lein H, Rød JK. Climate change, natural hazards, and risk perception: The role of proximity and personal experience. Local Environ. 2015;20(4). 32. Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C. The risk perception paradox – implications for gover- nance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal. 2012;33(6). 33. Myers T, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C. The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang. 2013;3(5):343–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1754 34. Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010;15(4):309–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020761 PMID: 20954780

Trang 18 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

35. Kalla JL, Broockman DE. Reducing exclusionary attitudes through interpersonal conversation: evi- dence from three field experiments. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2020;114(2):410–25. 36. Brown K, Adger W, Devine-Wright P, Anderies J, Barr S, Bousquet F. Empathy, place and identity interactions for sustainability. Glob Environ Change. 2019;56:11–7. 37. Berenguer J. The effect of empathy in environmental moral reasoning. Environ Behav. 2010;42(1):110–34. 38. Webster S, Albertson B. Emotion and politics: noncognitive psychological biases in public opinion. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2022;25. 39. Geiger N, Swim J, Gruszczynski M. Political psychology and the climate crisis. In: Osborne D, Sibley C, editors. The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2022. 40. Goldberg MH, van der Linden S, Maibach E, Leiserowitz A. Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019.