Fixed point-based stability analysis of climate and Langevin models
pmc-PMC12225866.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 18 trang
PLOS One Fixed point-based stability analysis of climate and Langevin models Let 𝜏 – ln0.6 A 0 and define FP ln𝔚. Then, dmΘu, Θy ≤ 0.6 dmu, y ⇒ FdmΘu, Θy ≤ Fdmu, y – 𝜏, which satisfies the Ćirić-type contraction condition. Moreover, the function Γ𝜈, 𝛼, F 0.3𝜈 cos𝜈 0.1e–t, is continuous in both 𝜈 and t. Additionally, the growth condition |Γ𝜈1 – Γ𝜈2| ≤ 0.6|𝜈1 – 𝜈2| ≤ Mu, y e𝜏1 t , holds with Mu, y dmu, y, since 0.6 @ e–𝜏 for 𝜏 – ln0.6. Therefore, all the conditions of Theorem 3.1 are true, and thus integral equation admits a unique solution 𝜈 ∈ 𝔐. 4 Existence results for Langevin equation In this section, the same approach is utilized to investigate the stability of the Langevin equation. dx dt 𝛽x gt, (17) where, g(t) is the external force, 𝛽 is a positive constant (damping coefficient or stabilizing term). Using the technique of green function, the Eq (17) can be transformed to xt S t 0 Kt, sgsds x0t, (18) where the Green function that describes how the system responds to the external forcing is K ¢¨¨ ¦ ¨¨¤ e–𝛽t–s, if t ≥ s, 0, if t @ s. Let 𝔐 Ct0, 𝛾 represent set of all real-valued functions with no discontinuity. Let us define dm 𝔐 × 𝔐 ℝ as dm𝔲, y |𝔲t – yt|, for all 𝔲, y ∈ 𝔐. (19) Evidently, 𝔐, dm represents a complete 𝕄-space. Theorem 4.1. Assume the fulfillment of the following hypotheses: (a2) The function gt s, t × s, t × ℝ ℝ is continuous on Ct0, 𝛾, Ct0, 𝛾2, and Ct0, 𝛾2 × ℝ, correspondingly.
PLOS One https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327488 July 3, 2025 11/ 18