Climate sensitivity of Cryptomeria japonica in two contrasting environments: Perspectives from QTL mapping
pmc-PMC6986750.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 14 trang
2. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manage. 2010; 259: 660–684. 3. Gray LK, Hamann A, John S, Rweyongeza D, Barnhardt L, Thomas BR. Climate change risk management in tree improvement programs: Selection and movement of genotypes. Tree Genet. Genomes. 2016;12. 4. Carrer M, Urbinati C. Long-term change in the sensitivity of tree-ring growth to climate forcing in Larix decidua. New Phytol. 2006; 170: 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01703.x PMID: 16684244 5. Leonelli G, Pelfini M, Battipaglia G, Cherubini P. Site-aspect influence on climate sensitivity over time of a high-altitude Pinus cembra tree-ring network. Clim Change. 2009; 96: 185–201. 6. Tei S, Sugimoto A, Yonenobu H, Ohta T, Maximov TC. Growth and physiological responses of larch trees to climate changes deduced from tree-ring widths and δ13C at two forest sites in eastern Siberia. Polar Sci. 2014; 8: 183–195. 7. Brookhouse M. Eucalypt dendrochronology: Past, present and potential. Aust. J. Bot. 2006; 54: 435. 8. Wils THG, Sass-Klaassen UGW, Eshetu Z, Bra¨ uning A, Gebrekirstos A, Couralet C, et al. Dendrochro- nology in the dry tropics: The Ethiopian case. Trees. 2010; 25: 345–354. 9. Pumijumnong N. Dendrochronology in Southeast Asia. Trees. 2012; 27: 343–358. 10. Gebrekirstos A, Bra¨uning A, Sass-Klassen U, Mbow C. Opportunities and applications of dendrochro- nology in Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2014; 6: 48–53.
11. Frank D, Esper J. Characterization and climate response patterns of a high-elevation, multi-species tree-ring network in the European Alps. Dendrochronologia. 2005; 22: 107–121. 12. Carrer M. Individualistic and time-varying tree-ring growth to climate sensitivity. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e22813. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022813 PMID: 21829523 13. Rahman M, Islam M, Wernicke J, Bra¨uning A. Changes in sensitivity of tree-ring widths to climate in a tropical moist forest tree in bangladesh. Forests. 2018; 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9010026 14. Tange T. Ecophysiological study on the growth of Cryptomeria japonica planted trees (in Japanese with English summary). Bulletin of The University of Tokyo Forests. 1995; 93: 65–145. 15. Batllori E, Camarero JJ, Ninot JM, Gutie´ rrez E. Seedling recruitment, survival and facilitation in alpine Pinus uncinata tree line ecotones. Implications and potential responses to climate warming. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2009; 18: 460–472. 16. Zhu K, Woodall CW, Ghosh S, Gelfand AE, Clark JS. Dual impacts of climate change: Forest migration and turnover through life history. Glob Chang Biol. 2013; 20: 251–264. 17. Housset JM, Nadeau S, Isabel N, Depardieu C, Duchesne I, Lenz P, et al. Tree rings provide a new class of phenotypes for genetic associations that foster insights into adaptation of conifers to climate change. New Phytol. 2018; 218: 630–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14968 PMID: 29314017 18. Nakashizuka T, Iida S, Masaki T, Shibata M, Tanaka H. Evaluating increased fitness through dispersal:
a comparative study on tree populations in a temperate forest, Japan. Ecoscience. 1995; 2: 245–251. 19. Gaspar MJ, Borralho N, Gomes AL. Comparison between field performance of cuttings and seedlings of Eucalyptus globulus. Ann For Sci. 2005; 62: 837–841. 20. Sixto H, Salvia J, Barrio M, Ciria M, Cañellas I. Genetic variation and genotype-environment interactions in short rotation Populus plantations in southern Europe. New For. 2011; 42: 163–177. 21. Berlin S, Hallingba¨ ck HR, Beyer F, Nordh N-E, Weih M, Ro¨ nnberg-Wa¨stljung A-C. Genetics of pheno- typic plasticity and biomass traits in hybrid willows across contrasting environments and years. Ann Bot. 2017; 120: 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcx029 PMID: 28449073 22. Villemereuil P de, Gaggiotti OE, Mouterde M, Till-Bottraud I. Common garden experiments in the geno- mic era: new perspectives and opportunities. Heredity. 2016; 116: 249–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy. 2015.93 PMID: 26486610 23. Trujillo-Moya C, George J-P, Fluch S, Geburek T, Grabner M, Karanitsch-Ackerl S, et al. Drought sensi- tivity of Norway spruce at the species’ warmest fringe: quantitative and molecular analysis reveals high genetic variation among and within provenances. G3. 2018; 8: 1225. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117. 300524 PMID: 29440346 24. Neale DB, Kremer A. Forest tree genomics: Growing resources and applications. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12: 111. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2931 PMID: 21245829 25. Jannink J-L, Lorenz AJ, Iwata H. Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief
Funct Genomics. 2010; 9: 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elq001 PMID: 20156985 26. Crossa J, Pe´rez-Rodrı´guez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos-Lo´ pez O, Jarquı´n D, Campos G de los, et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Sci. 2017; 22: 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.08.011 PMID: 28965742 Climate sensitivity of Cryptomeria japonica PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228278 January 28, 2020 12 / 14