How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data

29. Szomszor M, Adie E. Overton: A bibliometric database of policy document citations 2022 [cited 2022 March 8]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07643. 30. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 3.6.0 ed. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. 31. Wickham H. Tidyverse: Easily install and load the ’Tidyverse’. R package version 1.2.1. 2017 [22 June 2020]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyverse. 32. Teixeira da Silva JA. CiteScore: Advances, evolution, applications, and limitations. Publishing Research Quarterly. 2020; 36(3):459–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09736-y 33. Lamb WF, Wiedmann T, Pongratz J, Andrew R, Crippa M, Olivier JGJ, et al. A review of trends and driv- ers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environmental Research Letters. 2021; 16(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e WOS:000667941000001. 34. Minx JC, Lamb WF, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Crippa M, Do¨ bbeling N, et al. A comprehensive and syn- thetic dataset for global, regional, and national greenhouse gas emissions by sector 1970–2018 with an extension to 2019. Earth System Science Data. 2021; 13(11):5213–52. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd- 13-5213-2021 35. Friedlingstein P, Jones MW, O’Sullivan M, Andrew RM, Bakker DCE, Hauck J, et al. Global carbon bud- get 2021. Earth System Science Data Discussion. 2021; 2021:1–191. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd- 2021-386 36. United Nations Environment Programme. Emissions gap report 2021: The heat is on–A world of climate

promises not yet delivered. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and UNEP DTU Partnership, 2021. 37. Ou Y, Iyer G, Clarke L, Edmonds J, Fawcett AA, Hultman N, et al. Can updated climate pledges limit warming well below 2 degrees C? Increased ambition and implementation are essential. Science. 2021; 374(6568):693–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abl8976 WOS:000714952000018. PMID: 34735225 38. Haunschild R, Bornmann L, Marx W. Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. Plos One. 2016; 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160393 WOS:000381516300048. PMID: 27472663 39. Berrang-Ford L, Sietsma AJ, Callaghan M, Minx JC, Scheelbeek PFD, Haddaway NR, et al. Systematic mapping of global research on climate and health: A machine learning review. Lancet Planet Health. 2021; 5(8):E514–E25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00179-0 WOS:000685102900011. PMID: 34270917 40. Boyack KW, Klavans R. Creation and analysis of large-scale bibliometric networks. In: Gla¨nzel W, Moed HF, Schmoch U, Thelwall M, editors. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 187–212. 41. Traag VA, Waltman L, van Eck NJ. From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communi- ties. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9(1):5233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z PMID: 30914743 42. Martin S, Brown WM, Klavans R, Boyack K, editors. OpenOrd: An open-source toolbox for large graph layout. SPIE 7868, Visualization and Data Analysis; 2011; San Francisco Airport, CA, USA: SPIE.

43. Boyack KW, Newman D, Duhon RJ, Klavans R, Patek M, Biberstine JR, et al. Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: Comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(3):-. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018029 ISI:000288514600022. PMID: 21437291 44. Sparck Jones K, Walker S, Robertson SE. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: Development and comparative experiments: Part 1. Information Processing & Management. 2000; 36(6):779–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00015-7 45. Sparck Jones K, Walker S, Robertson SE. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: Development and comparative experiments: Part 2. Information Processing & Management. 2000; 36(6):809–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00016-9 46. Bo¨ rner K, Klavans R, Patek M, Zoss AM, Biberstine JR, Light RP, et al. Design and update of a classifi- cation system: The UCSD map of science. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7(7):e39464. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0039464 PMID: 22808037 47. Bornmann L, Marx W. How should the societal impact of research be generated and measured? A pro- posal for a simple and practicable approach to allow interdisciplinary comparisons. Scientometrics. 2014; 98(1):211–9. WOS:000329319200015. 48. Isett KR, Hicks D. Pathways from research into public decision making: Intermediaries as the third com- munity. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. 2019; 3(1):45–58. https://doi.org/10. 1093/ppmgov/gvz020

49. Minx JC, Callaghan M, Lamb WF, Garard J, Edenhofer O. Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond. Environmental Science & Policy. 2017; 77:252–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envsci.2017.05.014 WOS:000413281800032. PLOS ONE How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274693 September 22, 2022 24 / 24