How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? An empirical analysis based on Overton data

7. Mach KJ, Freeman PT, Mastrandrea MD, Field CB. A multistage crucible of revision and approval shapes IPCC policymaker summaries. Science Advances. 2016; 2(8). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv. 1600421 WOS:000383734300017. PMID: 27532046 8. Field CB, Barros VR. Added value from IPCC approval sessions. Science. 2015; 350(6256):36. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8976 WOS:000362098300031. PMID: 26430105 9. Yang C, Huang C, Su J. A bibliometrics-based research framework for exploring policy evolution: A case study of China’s information technology policies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020;157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120116 WOS:000540275500034. 10. Callaghan M, Schleussner CF, Nath S, Lejeune Q, Knutson TR, Reichstein M, et al. Machine-learning- based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies. Nat Clim Change. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01168-6 WOS:000706044400005. 11. Yin Y, Gao J, Jones BF, Wang DS. Coevolution of policy and science during the pandemic. Science. 2021; 371(6525):128–30. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3084 WOS:000606520400023. PMID: 33414211 12. Bornmann L. Scientific revolution in scientometrics: The broadening of impact from citation to societal. In: Sugimoto CR, editor. Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter; 2016. p. 347–59. 13. Tahamtan I, Bornmann L. Altmetrics and societal impact measurements: Match or mismatch? A litera- ture review. El Profesional de la Informacio´ n. 2020; 29(1):e290102.

14. Fang Z, Dudek J, Noyons E, Costas R. New possibilities of studying the interactions between policy and science: A descriptive exploration of the policy documents indexed by Overton. Quantitative Science Studies. in press. 15. Black N, Donald A. Evidence based policy: Proceed with care. British Medical Journal. 2001; 323 (7307):275–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7307.275 PMID: 11485961 16. Pedersen DB. The political epistemology of science-based policy-making. Society. 2014; 51(5):547–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9820-z 17. OPENing UP. Deliverable D5.1 –Altmetrics Status Quo. OPENing UP new methods, indicators and tools for peer review, impact measurement and dissemination of research results. Project acronym: OpenUP. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2016. 18. Vilkins S, Grant WJ. Types of evidence cited in Australian Government publications. Scientometrics. 2017; 113(3):1681–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2544-2 19. Arthur T. Categorizing policy document citations in PlumX 2016 [cited 2017 March 10]. Available from: http://plumanalytics.com/categorizing-policy-document-citations-in-plumx/. 20. Michalek A, Crosby T, Arthur T, Parkhill M, James C, McCullough R, et al. Research assessment met- rics: Past, present and future. Amsterdam, the Netherland: Elsevier; 2017. 21. Bornmann L, Haunschild R, Marx W. Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? Scientometrics. 2016; 109

(3):1477–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y WOS:000389336100004. PMID: 27942080 22. Haunschild R, Bornmann L. How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data. Scientometrics. 2017; 110 (3):1209–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2237-2 WOS:000394339500007. PMID: 28255186 23. Tattersall A, Carroll C. What can Altmetric.com tell us about policy citations of research? An analysis of Altmetric.com data for research articles from the University of Sheffield. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. 2018; 2(9). https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2017.00009 24. Fang Z, Costas R, Tian W, Wang X, Wouters P. An extensive analysis of the presence of altmetric data for Web of Science publications across subject fields and research topics. Scientometrics. 2020; 124 (3):2519–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03564-9 PMID: 32836523 25. Hicks D, Isett KR. Powerful numbers: Exemplary quantitative studies of science that had policy impact. Quantitative Science Studies. 2020; 1(3):969–82. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00060 26. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy. 1991; 20(1):1–12. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90080-a WOS:A1991FG31100001. 27. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: An update of empirical findings. Research Policy. 1998; 26(7–8):773–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00043-7 WOS:000073600200004.

28. Pinheiro H, Vignola-Gagne´ E, Campbell D. A large-scale validation of the relationship between cross- disciplinary research and its uptake in policy-related documents, using the novel Overton altmetrics database. Quantitative Science Studies. 2021; 2(2):616–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00137 PLOS ONE How relevant is climate change research for climate change policy? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274693 September 22, 2022 23 / 24