Climate change and seismic resilience: Key considerations for Alaska’s infrastructure and built environment

northeastern Siberia. PLOS ONE. 2018 Mar 22; 13(3):e0194014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0194014 PMID: 29565980 56. Anderson CG, Bond-Lamberty B, Stegen JC. Active layer depth and soil properties impact specific leaf area variation and ecosystem productivity in a boreal forest. PLOS ONE. 2021 Dec 31; 15(12): e0232506. 57. Xu G, Yang Z, Dutta U, Tang L, Marx E. Seasonally Frozen Soil Effects on the Seismic Site Response. J Cold Reg Eng. 2011; 25(2):53–70. 58. Yang ZJ, Dutta U, Zhu D, Marx E, Biswas N. Seasonal Frost Effects on the Soil–Foundation–Structure Interaction System. J Cold Reg Eng. 2007; 21(4):108–20. 59. Thornley JD, Moran N, Daggett A, Krzewinski TG. Estimating Liquefaction Potential of Thawing Perma- frost Soils, an Evaluation of Frozen and Recently Thawed Soils. In: Congress on Technical Advance- ment 2017 [Internet]. 2017. p. 141–50. Available from: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/ 9780784481011.014 60. Ghayoomi M, Ghadirianniari S, Khosravi A, Mirshekari M. Seismic behavior of pile-supported systems in unsaturated sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2018; 112:162–73. 61. Turner MM, Ghayoomi M, Ueda K, Uzuoka R. Performance of rocking foundations on unsaturated soil layers with variable groundwater levels. Ge´otechnique. 2021; 0(0):1–14. 62. Turner MM, Ghayoomi M, Ueda K, Uzuoka R. Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction of Inelastic Struc- tural Systems on Unsaturated Soil Layers. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng. 2022; 148(7):04022049. 63. Seed HB, Idriss IM. Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential. J Soil Mech Found

Div. 1971 Sep 1; 97(9):1249–73. 64. Dashti S, Karimi Z. Ground Motion Intensity Measures to Evaluate I: The Liquefaction Hazard in the Vicinity of Shallow-Founded Structures. Earthq Spectra. 2017 Feb 1; 33(1):241–76. 65. Seed HB, Lee KL. Liquefaction of Saturated Sands During Cyclic Loading. J Soil Mech Found Div. 1966; 92(6):105–34. 66. Liquefaction Ishihara K. and flow failure during earthquakes. Ge´otechnique. 1993; 43(3):351–451. 67. Kawakami F, Asada A. Damage to the Ground and Earth Structures by the Niigata Earthquake of June 16, 1964. Soils Found. 1966 Jan 1; 6(1):14–30. 68. Seed HB, Wilson SD. The Turnagain Heights Landslide, Anchorage, Alaska. J Soil Mech Found Div. 1967; 93(4):325–53. 69. Wagner AM. Review of Thermosyphon Applications. New Hampshire: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory; 2014 p. 1–37. Report No.: TR-14-1. 70. Richardson P. Tough Alaska conditions prove new pile design’s versatility. Alaska Construction and Oil. 1979;20–8. 71. Heuer CE. The application of heat pipes on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. New Hampshire: US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory; 1979 p. 1–33. Report No.: 79–26. 72. ASHSC. Policy Recommendation 2020–1 Improve Building Code Adoption and Enforcement [Internet]. Alaska Seismic Hazards Safety Commission; 2020. Report No.: 2020–1. Available from: https:// seismic.alaska.gov/download/ashsc_meetings_minutes/pr_2020-1_code_adoption_and_enforcement. pdf

73. Schilderman T, Lyons M. Resilient dwellings or resilient people? Towards people-centred reconstruc- tion. Environ Hazards [Internet]. 2011 Dec 1 [cited 2022 Jul 19]; 10(3–4):218–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2011.598497 74. Spoon J, Gerkey D, Chhetri RB, Rai A, Basnet U, Hunter CE. Understanding short-term household recoveries from the 2015 Nepal earthquakes: Lessons learned and recommendations. Prog Disaster Sci [Internet]. 2021 Apr 1 [cited 2022 Jul 19]; 10:100169. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S2590061721000296 75. Banerjee T, Loukaitou-Sideris A. The New Companion to Urban Design. London: Routledge; 2019. 714 p. 76. Bartram R. Stacked Decks: Building Inspectors and the Reproduction of Urban Inequality. University of Chicago Press; 2022. 77. Henderson K. Achieving legitimacy: visual discourses in engineering design and green building code development. Build Res Inf [Internet]. 2007 Feb 1 [cited 2022 Jul 19]; 35(1):6–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210600979780 78. Shapiro S. The realpolitik of building codes: overcoming practical limitations to climate resilience. Build Res Inf [Internet]. 2016 Aug 17 [cited 2022 Jul 19]; 44(5–6):490–506. Available from: https://doi.org/10. 1080/09613218.2016.1156957 PLOS ONE Climate change and seismic resilience: Key considerations for Alaska’s infrastructure and built environment PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292320 October 18, 2023 16 / 17