Climate change and seismic resilience: Key considerations for Alaska’s infrastructure and built environment

33. Brubaker M, Berner J, Chavan R, Warren J. Climate change and health effects in Northwest Alaska. Glob Health Action. 2011 Dec 1; 4(1):8445. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v4i0.8445 PMID: 22022304 34. Gregory R, Failing L, Leiserowitz A. Climate change impacts, vulnerabilities, and adaptation in North- west Alaska. Yale University; 2006 p. 16. Report No.: 06–11. 35. Carothers C, Brown C, Moerlein KJ, Lo´ pez JA, Andersen DB, Retherford B. Measuring perceptions of climate change in northern Alaska: pairing ethnography with cultural consensus analysis. Ecol Soc [Internet]. 2014; 19(4). Available from: https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss4/art27/ 36. Huntington HP, Braem NM, Brown CL, Hunn E, Krieg TM, Lestenkof P, et al. Local and traditional knowledge regarding the Bering Sea ecosystem: Selected results from five indigenous communities. Underst Ecosyst Process East Bering Sea II. 2013 Oct 1; 94:323–32. 37. McNeeley SM. Examining barriers and opportunities for sustainable adaptation to climate change in Interior Alaska. Clim Change. 2012 Apr 1; 111(3):835–57. 38. Kettle NP, Trainor SF, Loring PA. Conceptualizing the Science-Practice Interface: Lessons from a Col- laborative Network on the Front-Line of Climate Change. Front Environ Sci [Internet]. 2017;5. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00033 39. Brookshire DS, Chang SE, Cochrane H, Olson RA, Rose A, Steenson J. Direct and Indirect Economic Losses from Earthquake Damage. Earthq Spectra. 1997 Nov 1; 13(4):683–701.

40. Adey B, Hajdin R, Bru¨ hwiler E. Effect of Common Cause Failures on Indirect Costs. J Bridge Eng. 2004 Mar 1; 9(2):200–8. 41. Forcellini D. A new methodology to assess indirect losses in bridges subjected to multiple hazards. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2019 Jan 18; 4(1):10. 42. USACE. Alaska baseline erosion assessment. Study findings and technical report [Internet]. Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; 2009 p. 65. Available from: https://www.poa. usace.army.mil/Portals/34/docs/civilworks/BEA/AlaskaBaselineErosionAssessmentBEAMainReport. pdf 43. Larsen PH, Goldsmith S, Smith O, Wilson ML, Strzepek K, Chinowsky P, et al. Estimating future costs for Alaska public infrastructure at risk from climate change. Glob Environ Change. 2008; 18(3):442–57. 44. Melvin AM, Larsen P, Boehlert B, Neumann JE, Chinowsky P, Espinet X, et al. Climate change dam- ages to Alaska public infrastructure and the economics of proactive adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017; 114(2):E122–31. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611056113 PMID: 28028223 45. Jorgenson MT, Yoshikawa K, Kanevskiy M, Shur Y, Romanovsky V, Marchenko S, et al. Permafrost characteristics of Alaska. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Permafrost. Fair- banks, AK; 2008. 46. Petersen MD, Shumway AM, Powers PM, Mueller CS, Moschetti MP, Frankel AD, et al. The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview of model and implications. Earthq Spectra. 2020 Feb 1; 36(1):5–41.

47. Ferrians OJ. Permafrost Map of Alaska. Map I-445. US Geological Survey; 1965. (Miscellaneous Geo- logic Investigations). 48. Wesson RL, Boyd OS, Mueller CS, Bufe CG, Frankel AD, Peterson MD. Revision of Time-Independent Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps for Alaska. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey; 2007 p. 33. Report No.: 2007–1043. 49. Denali Commission. Statewide Threat Assessment. Denali Commission, an Independent Federal Gov- ernment Agency; 2019. 50. Chadburn SE, Burke EJ, Cox PM, Friedlingstein P, Hugelius G, Westermann S. An observation-based constraint on permafrost loss as a function of global warming. Nat Clim Change. 2017 May 1; 7(5):340–4. 51. ACIA. Impacts of a warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge University Press: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme; 2004 p. 140. 52. Burgess M, Desrochers DT, Saunders R. Potential changes in thaw depth and thaw settlement for three locations in the Mackenzie Valley. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin; 2000. (The Physical Environ- ment of the Mackenzie Valley, Northwest Territories: a Baseline for the Assessment of Environmental Change). 53. Yi Y, Kimball JS. ABoVE: Active Layer Thickness from Remote Sensing Permafrost Model, Alaska, 2001–2015. Oak Ridge, Tennessee: Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Archive Center for Biogeochemical Dynamics; 2020. 54. Anisimov OA, Shiklomanov NI, Nelson FE. Global warming and active-layer thickness: results from transient general circulation models. Glob Planet Change. 1997 Oct 1; 15(3):61–77.

55. Loranty MM, Berner LT, Taber ED, Kropp H, Natali SM, Alexander HD, et al. Understory vegetation mediates permafrost active layer dynamics and carbon dioxide fluxes in open-canopy larch forests of PLOS ONE Climate change and seismic resilience: Key considerations for Alaska’s infrastructure and built environment PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292320 October 18, 2023 15 / 17