Climate change and seismic resilience: Key considerations for Alaska’s infrastructure and built environment

Data curation: Matthew M. Turner. Formal analysis: Matthew M. Turner. Funding acquisition: Majid Ghayoomi, Katharine Duderstadt, Jennifer Brewer, Alexander Kholodov. Investigation: Matthew M. Turner. Methodology: Matthew M. Turner, Majid Ghayoomi, Jennifer Brewer. Project administration: Majid Ghayoomi. Resources: Majid Ghayoomi. Software: Jennifer Brewer. Supervision: Majid Ghayoomi, Katharine Duderstadt, Jennifer Brewer. Validation: Matthew M. Turner, Jennifer Brewer. Visualization: Matthew M. Turner. Writing – original draft: Matthew M. Turner. Writing – review & editing: Majid Ghayoomi, Katharine Duderstadt, Jennifer Brewer, Alexander Kholodov. References 1. ASU Center for Emergency Management and Homeland Security. The Spatial Hazards Events and Losses Database for the United States, Version 2.0 [Internet]. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University; 2022. Available from: https://cemhs.asu.edu/sheldus 2. Sokolowski TJ. The Great Alaskan Earthquake & Tsunamis of 1964 [Internet]. Palmer, Alaska: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration West Coast & Alaska Tsunami Warning Center; 2009 Aug [cited 2022 Jun 26]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20090825012553/ http:/ wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/64quake.htm 3. Hansen WR. The Alaska Earthquake of 1964. Nature. 1967 Jul 1; 215(5099):348–51. 4. Jibson RW R. Grant AR, Witter RC, Allstadt KE, Thompson EM, Bender AM. Ground Failure from the Anchorage, Alaska, Earthquake of 30 November 2018. Seismol Res Lett. 2019 Oct; 91(1):19–32.

5. Franke KW, Koehler RD, Beyzaei CZ, Cabas A, Pierce I, Stuedlein A, et al. Geotechnical engineering reconnaissance of the 30 November 2018 Mw 7.0 Anchorage, Alaska earthquake [Internet]. Geotechni- cal Extreme Events Association Repor; 2019. Report No.: GEER-059. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.18118/G6P07F 6. Chapin FS, Trainor SFI, Cochran P, Huntington H, Markon C, McCammon M, et al. Alaska. J. M. Melillo, Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and G. W. Yohe. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program; 2014. (Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment). 7. Markon C, Gray S, Berman M, Eerkes-Medrano L, Hennessy T, Huntington H, et al. Alaska [Internet]. Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stew- art. Washington, DC: U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC; 2018 [cited 2022 Apr 26]. (Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II). Available from: https://doi.org/10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH26 8. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hibbard K, et al. The representative con- centration pathways: an overview. Clim Change. 2011 Aug 5; 109(1):5. 9. Walsh JE, Bhatt US, Littell JS, Leonawicz M, Lindgren M, Kurkowski TA, et al. Downscaling of climate model output for Alaskan stakeholders. Environ Model Softw. 2018; 110:38–51. 10. Instanes A, Mjureke D. Design criteria for infrastructure on permafrost based on future climate scenar-

ios [Internet]. Norwegian Polar Institute; 2002. Report No.: SV4242-2. Available from: http://acia. npolar.no PLOS ONE Climate change and seismic resilience: Key considerations for Alaska’s infrastructure and built environment PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292320 October 18, 2023 13 / 17