Comparing Academic Performance of Elementary Education Majors in General Education Science Courses

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320137 March 19, 2025 14 / 15 PLOS ONE Elementary Education Majors in General Education Science Courses 42. Goulden M, Mason M, Frasch K. Keeping women in the science pipeline. Annals of the Ame Academy of Political and Social Science. 2011;638(1):141–62. 43. Malespina A, Singh C. Gender gaps in grades versus grade penalties: Why grade anomalies may be more detrimental for women aspiring for careers in biological sciences. Int J STEM Educ. 2023;10(1):13. 44. Willoughby S, Metz A. Exploring gender differences with different gain calculations in astronomy and biology. Am J Physics. 2009;77(7):651–7. 45. Odom S, Boso H, Bowling S, Brownell S, Cotner S, Creech C, et al. Meta-analysis of gender perfor- mance gaps in undergraduate natural science courses. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021;20(3):ar40. https:// doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-11-0260 PMID: 34283633 46. Eddy S, Brownell S. Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate educa- tion across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines. Physical Rev Physics Educ Res. 2016;12(2):020106. 47. Zembal-Saul C. The role of teacher education in advancing reform in primary science education. In: Yew-Jin Lee JT, editor. Primary science education in East Asia: A critical comparison of systems and strategies. Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education. 47. Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2018. p. 229–41. 48. Thompson C, Eodice M, Tran P. Student perceptions of general education requirements at a large

public university: No surprises?. J Gen Educ. 2015;64(4):278–93. 49. Seeley EL, Goddard T, Mellado M. Ge-whiz! How students choose their general education classes. J Applied Res Higher Educ. 2018;10(3):322–32. 50. Stuckey M, Hofstein A, Mamlok-Naaman R, Eilks I. The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Sci Educ 2013;49(1):1–34. 51. Huber MJ. Unveiling blind spots: Assessing opportunities to improve general education requirement communications to Oregon State University students [Dissertation]: Oregon State University; 2024. 52. Glanzer PL. General education sucks so teach the great identities. J Gen Educ. 2020;69(3/4):179–95. 53. Watkins S. Making general education meaningful. 2023. 54. McLoughlin AS, Dana TM. Making science relevant: the experiences of prospective elementary school teachers in an innovative science content course. J Sci Teach Educ. 1999;10(2):69–91. https:// doi.org/10.1023/a:1009410130218 55. Harackiewicz JM, Canning EA, Tibbetts Y, Priniski SJ, Hyde JS. Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016;111(5):745–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075 PMID: 26524001 56. Malau-Aduli BS, Lee AY, Cooling N, Catchpole M, Jose M, Turner R. Retention of knowledge and perceived relevance of basic sciences in an integrated case-based learning (CBL) curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-139 PMID: 24099045

57. Cruickshank D, Kennedy J, Kapel D. A case history of differential grading: Do teacher education majors really receive higher grades?. J Teach Educ. n.d.;31(4):43–7. 58. Prather J, Smith G, Kodras J. A longitudinal study of grades in 144 undergraduate courses. Res Higher Educ. 1979;10(1):11–24. 59. Hawk PP. A comparison of education and non-education majors in general college courses. American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education National Meeting1999. 60. Friedrichsen P. Moving from hands-on to inquiry-based: A biology course for prospective elementary teachers. Am Biology Teach. 2001;63(8):562–8. 61. Naidoo K. Capturing the transformation and dynamic nature of an elementary teacher candidate’s identity development as a teacher of science. Res Sci Educ. 2016:1–25. 62. Schwartz M, Sadler P, Sonnert G, Tai R. Depth versus breadth: How content coverage in high school science courses relates to later success in college science coursework. Sci Educ. 2009;93(5):798–826. 63. Sæleset J, Friedrichsen P. A case study of specialized science courses in teacher education and their impact on classroom teaching. J Sci Teach Educ. 2022;33(6):641–63. 64. Harlow D, Swanson L, Otero V. Prospective elementary teachers’ analysis of children’s science talk in an undergraduate physics course. J Sci Teach Educ. 2014;25(1):97–117. 65. Trumbull E. Why do we grade—and should we? In: Trumbull E, Farr B, editors. Grading and reporting student progress in an age of standards. Norwood, MA, USA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.; 2000. p. 23–43.