Designing profitable and climate-smart farms using virtual reality

13. Wheeler DM, Ledgard SF, Boyes M. Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER(R) model. Animal. 2013; 7 Suppl 2:437–43. Epub 2013/06/14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000797 PMID: 23739485. 14. Shi J, Honjo T, Zhang K, Furuya K. Using Virtual Reality to Assess Landscape: A Comparative Study Between On-Site Survey and Virtual Reality of Aesthetic Preference and Landscape Cognition. Sustain- ability. 2020; 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072875 15. Pettit CJ, Raymond CM, Bryan BA, Lewis H. Identifying strengths and weaknesses of landscape visuali- sation for effective communication of future alternatives. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2011; 100 (3):231–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.001 16. Bishop ID. Location based information to support understanding of landscape futures. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2015; 142:120–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.001 17. Yu F, Zhang J-F, Zhao Y, Zhao J-C, Tan C, Luan R-P, editors. The research and application of virtual reality (VR) technology in agriculture science. Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture III: Third IFIP TC 12 International Conference, CCTA 2009, Beijing, China, October 14–17, 2009, Revised Selected Papers 3; 2010: Springer. 18. Wissen U, Schroth O, Lange E, Schmid WA. Approaches to integrating indicators into 3D landscape visualisations and their benefits for participative planning situations. J Environ Manage. 2008; 89

(3):184–96. Epub 2007/10/24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.062 PMID: 17950983. 19. Wu H, He Z, Gong J. A virtual globe-based 3D visualization and interactive framework for public partici- pation in urban planning processes. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2010; 34(4):291–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.12.001 20. Beef+LambNZ. Benchmarking tool, Beef + Lamb New Zealand, Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://beeflambnz.com/data-tools/benchmarking-tool. 2023. 21. EOS. LandViewer [cited 2023]. Available from: https://eos.com/landviewer. 22. LINZ. Canterbury—Banks Peninsula LiDAR 1m DEM (2018–2019), Land Information New Zealand, Retrieved January 10, 2023 from. https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/105027-canterbury-banks-peninsula- lidar-1m-dem-2018-2019/. 2023. 23. LINZ. Canterbury 0.3m Rural Aerial Photos (2015–2016), Land Information New Zealand, Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https://data.linz.govt.nz/layer/53519-canterbury-03m-rural-aerial-photos-2015- 2016/. 2023. 24. MPI. CarbonLook-upTables for Forestry in the Emissions Trading Scheme (A guide). Ministry for Pri- mary Industries. Wellington–NZ. Ministry for Primary Industries. Retrieved from - https://www.mpi.govt. nz/dmsdocument/31695-Guide-to-carbon-Look-up-tables-for-Forestry-in-the-ETS. 2017. 25. Lynch J. Availability of disaggregated greenhouse gas emissions from beef cattle production: a system- atic review. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2019; 76:69–78. Epub 2019/08/08. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eiar.2019.02.003 PMID: 31388221; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6684367.

26. Beef+LambNZ. Compendium of Farm Facts (Report). Wellington–NZ. Beef + Lamb New Zealand. Retrieved from - https://beeflambnz.com/sites/default/files/data/files/Compendium%202019.pdf. 2019. 27. Case B, Ryan C. An analysis of carbon stocks and net carbon position for New Zealand sheep and beef farmland (Report). Auckland–NZ. Auckland University of Technology. Retrieved from - https:// beeflambnz.com/sites/default/files/news-docs/BL_Carbon_report_for_review_final_submit.pdf. 2020. 28. Tavakkoli A. Game Development and Simulation with Unreal Technology: A K Peters/CRC Press; 2nd edition; 2018. 29. Beef+LambNZ. Data & Tools, Beef + Lamb New Zealand, Retrieved January 10, 2023 from https:// beeflambnz.com/data-tools/farm-classes. 2023. 30. Amies AC, Dymond JR, Shepherd JD, Pairman D, Hoogendoorn C, Sabetizade M, et al. National Map- ping of New Zealand Pasture Productivity Using Temporal Sentinel-2 Data. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13 (8). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13081481 31. Chen Y, Guerschman J, Shendryk Y, Henry D, Harrison MT. Estimating Pasture Biomass Using Senti- nel-2 Imagery and Machine Learning. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs13040603 32. Reinermann S, Asam S, Kuenzer C. Remote Sensing of Grassland Production and Management—A Review. Remote Sensing. 2020; 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12121949 33. Ma Q, Chai L, Hou F, Chang S, Ma Y, Tsunekawa A, et al. Quantifying Grazing Intensity Using Remote Sensing in Alpine Meadows on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Sustainability. 2019; 11(2). https://doi.org/10. 3390/su11020417

34. Tozer K, Douglas G, Dodd M, Mu¨ ller K. Vegetation Options for Increasing Resilience in Pastoral Hill Country. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2021; 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.550334 PLOS ONE Designing profitable and climate-smart farms using virtual reality PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286723 June 2, 2023 14 / 16