Interacting effects of habitat structure and seeding with oysters on the intertidal biodiversity of seawalls

56. Butman CA, Grassle JP, Webb CM. Substrate choices made by marine larvae settling in still water and in a flume flow. Nature. 1988; 333(6175):771. 57. Clynick B, Chapman M, Underwood A. Effects of epibiota on assemblages of fish associated with urban structures. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2007; 332:201–10. 58. Clynick B, Chapman M, Underwood A. Fish assemblages associated with urban structures and natural reefs in Sydney, Australia. Austral Ecology. 2008; 33(2):140–50. 59. Anderson M, Connell S. Predation by fish on intertidal oysters. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 1999; 187:203–11. 60. Connell S. Predatory fish do not always affect the early development of epibiotic assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2001; 260(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0981 (01)00246-5 PMID: 11358568 61. Connell S, Anderson M. Predation by fish on assemblages of intertidal epibiota: effects of predator size and patch size. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1999; 241(1):15–29. 62. Hedge LH, Johnston EL. Colonisation of the non-indigenous Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas deter- mined by predation, size and initial settlement densities. PloS one. 2014; 9(3):e90621. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0090621 PMID: 24663029 63. Bulleri F. Experimental evaluation of early patterns of colonisation of space on rocky shores and sea- walls. Marine Environmental Research. 2005; 60(3):355–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2004. 12.002 PMID: 15769504

64. Bulleri F. Role of recruitment in causing differences between intertidal assemblages on seawalls and rocky shores. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2005; 287:53–65. 65. Bulleri F, Chapman M, Underwood A. Intertidal assemblages on seawalls and vertical rocky shores in Sydney Harbour, Australia. Austral Ecology. 2005; 30(6):655–67. 66. Ivesˇa L, Chapman M, Underwood AJ, Murphy RJ. Differential patterns of distribution of limpets on inter- tidal seawalls: experimental investigation of the roles of recruitment, survival and competition. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2010; 407:55–69. 67. Jackson A, Chapman M, Underwood A. Ecological interactions in the provision of habitat by urban development: whelks and engineering by oysters on artificial seawalls. Austral Ecology. 2008; 33 (3):307–16. 68. Loke LH, Heery EC, Lai S, Bouma TJ, Todd PA. Area-independent effects of water-retaining features on intertidal biodiversity on eco-engineered seawalls in the tropics. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2019; 6:16. 69. Moreira J, Chapman M, Underwood A. Maintenance of chitons on seawalls using crevices on sand- stone blocks as habitat in Sydney Harbour, Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecol- ogy. 2007; 347(1):134–43. 70. Ferrario F, Ivesˇa L, Jaklin A, Perkol-Finkel S, Airoldi L. The overlooked role of biotic factors in controlling the ecological performance of artificial marine habitats. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2016; 53(1):16–24. 71. Goff M. Evaluating habitat enhancements of an urban intertidal seawall: Ecological responses and man-

agement implications: University of Washington; 2010. 72. Hellyer CB, Harasti D, Poore AG. Manipulating artificial habitats to benefit seahorses in Sydney Har- bour, Australia. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 2011; 21(6):582–9. 73. Toft JD, Ogston AS, Heerhartz SM, Cordell JR, Flemer EE. Ecological response and physical stability of habitat enhancements along an urban armored shoreline. Ecological Engineering. 2013; 57:97–108. 74. Mayer-Pinto M, Cole V, Johnston E, Bugnot A, Hurst H, Airoldi L, et al. Functional and structural responses to marine urbanisation. Environmental Research Letters. 2018; 13(1):014009. PLOS ONE Effects of microhabitats and seeding with oysters on intertidal biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230807 July 16, 2020 21 / 21