Thông tin tài nguyên

Interacting effects of habitat structure and seeding with oysters on the intertidal biodiversity of seawalls

pmc-PMC7365354.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 21 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 19 · Đoạn 51Vị trí nguồn

9. Pearsons TN, Li HW, Lamberti GA. Influence of habitat complexity on resistance to flooding and resil- ience of stream fish assemblages. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 1992; 121(4):427– 36. 10. McAbendroth L, Ramsay P, Foggo A, Rundle S, Bilton D. Does macrophyte fractal complexity drive invertebrate diversity, biomass and body size distributions? Oikos. 2005; 111(2):279–90. 11. Taniguchi H, Tokeshi M. Effects of habitat complexity on benthic assemblages in a variable environ- ment. Freshwater Biology. 2004; 49(9):1164–78. 12. Airoldi L, Connell SD, Beck MW. The loss of natural habitats and the addition of artificial substrata. Marine Hard Bottom Communities: Springer; 2009. p. 269–80. 13. Airoldi L, Turon X, Perkol-Finkel S, Rius M. Corridors for aliens but not for natives: effects of marine urban sprawl at a regional scale. Diversity and Distributions. 2015; 21(7):755–68. 14. Bulleri F, Chapman MG. The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine envi- ronments. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2010; 47(1):26–35. 15. Chapman M. Paucity of mobile species on constructed seawalls: effects of urbanization on biodiversity. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2003; 264:21–9. 16. Chapman M, Underwood A, Browne MA. An assessment of the current usage of ecological engineering and reconciliation ecology in managing alterations to habitats in urban estuaries. Ecological Engineer- ing. 2018; 120:560–73. 17. Chapman MG, Blockley DJ. Engineering novel habitats on urban infrastructure to increase intertidal bio-

Trang 19 · Đoạn 52Vị trí nguồn

diversity. Oecologia. 2009; 161(3):625–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1393-y PMID: 19551409 18. Firth LB, Knights AM, Bridger D, Evans AJ, Mieszkowska N, Moore PJ, et al. Ocean sprawl: challenges and opportunities for biodiversity management in a changing world. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review; 2016. p. 201–78. 19. Strain EM, Olabarria C, Mayer-Pinto M, Cumbo V, Morris RL, Bugnot AB, et al. Eco-engineering urban infrastructure for marine and coastal biodiversity: Which interventions have the greatest ecological ben- efit? Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018; 55(1):426–41. 20. Hacker SD, Steneck RS. Habitat Architecture and the Abundance and Body-Size-Dependent Habitat Selection of a Phytal Amphipod. Ecology. 1990; 71(6):2269–85. 21. Garrity SD. Some adaptations of gastropods to physical stress on a tropical rocky shore. Ecology. 1984; 65(2):559–74. 22. Underwood A, Jernakoff P. The effects of tidal height, wave-exposure, seasonality and rock-pools on grazing and the distribution of intertidal macroalgae in New South Wales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1984; 75(1):71–96. 23. Browne MA, Chapman MG. Mitigating against the loss of species by adding artificial intertidal pools to existing seawalls. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2014; 497:119–29. 24. Glasby T. Effects of shading on subtidal epibiotic assemblages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 1999; 234(2):275–90. 25. Irving AD, Connell SD. Sedimentation and light penetration interact to maintain heterogeneity of subtidal

Trang 19 · Đoạn 53Vị trí nguồn

habitats: algal versus invertebrate dominated assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2002; 245:83–91. 26. Miller RJ, Etter RJ. Shading facilitates sessile invertebrate dominance in the rocky subtidal Gulf of Maine. Ecology. 2008; 89(2):452–62. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1099.1 PMID: 18409434 27. McAfee D, Cole VJ, Bishop MJ. Latitudinal gradients in ecosystem engineering by oysters vary across habitats. Ecology. 2016; 97(4):929–39. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0651.1 PMID: 27220209 28. Almany GR. Priority effects in coral reef fish communities. Ecology. 2003; 84(7):1920–35. 29. Dean T, Hurd L. Development in an estuarine fouling community: the influence of early colonists on later arrivals. Oecologia. 1980; 46(3):295–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346255 PMID: 28310035 30. Vieira EA, Flores AA, Dias GM. Persistence and space preemption explain species-specific founder effects on the organization of marine sessile communities. Ecology and Evolution. 2018; 8(6):3430–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3853 PMID: 29607036 31. Connell JH, Slatyer RO. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. The American Naturalist. 1977; 111(982):1119–44. 32. Harris LG, Ebeling AW, Laur DR, Rowley RJ. Community recovery after storm damage: a case of facili- tation in primary succession. Science. 1984; 224(4655):1336–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.224. 4655.1336 PMID: 17837192 PLOS ONE Effects of microhabitats and seeding with oysters on intertidal biodiversity

Trang 19 · Đoạn 54Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230807 July 16, 2020 19 / 21