Spatially congruent sites of importance for global shark and ray biodiversity

59. Arponen A, Lehtoma¨ki J, Leppa¨nen J, et al. Effects of connectivity and spatial resolution of analyses on conservation prioritization across large extents. Conserv Biol. 2012; 26: 294–304. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01814.x PMID: 22268786 60. Rondinini C, Chiozza F. Quantitative methods for defining percentage area targets for habitat types in conservation planning. Biol Conserv. 2010; 143: 1646–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03. 037 61. Di Marco M, Watson JEM, Possingham HP, et al. Limitations and trade-offs in the use of species distri- bution maps for protected area planning. J Appl Ecol. 2017; 54: 402–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2664.12771 62. Rondinini C, Wilson KA, Boitani L, et al. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. Ecol Lett. 2006; 9: 1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461- 0248.2006.00970.x PMID: 16972877 63. Kesner-Reyes K, Kaschner K, Kullander S, et al. AquaMaps: Algorithm and data sources for aquatic organisms. In: Froese R. and Pauly D. Editors. 2012. Fishbase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (04/2012). Available: http://www.marine.csiro.au/csquares/ 64. Dulvy NK, Davidson LNK, Kyne PM, et al. Ghosts of the coast: Global extinction risk and conservation of sawfishes. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 2016; 26: 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc. 2525 65. Lawson JM, Pollom RP, Gordon C, et al. Global extinction risk and conservation of Critically Endan-

gered angel sharks in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Int Counc Explor Seas J Mar Sci. 2020; 77: 12–29. 66. Ebert DA, Fowler SL, Compagno LJ, et al. Sharks of the world: a fully illustrated guide. Wild Nature Press; 2013. 67. Ebert DA, Stahlman MF. Sharks, batoids, and chimaeras of the North Atlantic. FAO Specie. FAO Spe- cies Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2013. 68. Last P, Naylor G, Se´ ret B, et al. Rays of the World. CSIRO Publishing; 2016. 69. White WT, Last PR, Stevens JD, et al. Economically important sharks and rays of Indonesia. Canberra: Australia Centre for International Agricultural Research; 2006. 70. Belmaker J, Jetz W. Cross-scale variation in species richness-environment associations. Glob Ecol Bio- geogr. 2011; 20: 464–474. 71. Van Rensburg BJ, Chown SL, Gaston KJ. Species richness, environmental correlates, and spatial scale: A test using South African birds. Am Nat. 2002; 159: 566–577. https://doi.org/10.1086/339464 PMID: 18707437 PLOS ONE Spatially congruent sites of importance for global shark and ray biodiversity PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235559 July 6, 2020 19 / 19