Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries

six management scenarios (rows). The percentage labels indicate the percentage of countries falling in each quadrant of catch and profit outcomes. (TIFF) PLOS ONE Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347 March 5, 2020 16 / 21

Acknowledgments We thank Kate Bonzon and Willow Battista for valuable discussions while preparing the manuscript. Author Contributions Conceptualization: Christopher M. Free, Tracey Mangin, Jorge Garcı´a Molinos, Merrick Bur- den, Christopher Costello, Steven D. Gaines. Data curation: Christopher M. Free, Jorge Garcı´a Molinos. Formal analysis: Christopher M. Free, Tracey Mangin, Jorge Garcı´a Molinos. Funding acquisition: Christopher Costello, Steven D. Gaines. Investigation: Christopher M. Free, Tracey Mangin, Jorge Garcı´a Molinos, Elena Ojea, Mer- rick Burden, Christopher Costello, Steven D. Gaines. Methodology: Christopher M. Free, Tracey Mangin, Jorge Garcı´a Molinos. Project administration: Christopher M. Free, Tracey Mangin. Visualization: Christopher M. Free. Writing – original draft: Christopher M. Free, Tracey Mangin, Jorge Garcı´a Molinos, Elena Ojea, Christopher Costello, Steven D. Gaines. Writing – review & editing: Christopher M. Free, Tracey Mangin, Jorge Garcı´a Molinos, Elena Ojea, Merrick Burden, Christopher Costello, Steven D. Gaines. References 1. FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2018—Meeting the sustainable development goals. 2018; 1–227. 2. IPCC. IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. 2019. https://report. ipcc.ch/srocc/pdf/SROCC_FinalDraft_FullReport.pdf 3. Singh GG, Hilmi N, Bernhardt JR, Montemayor AMC, Cashion M, Ota Y, et al. Climate impacts on the ocean are making the Sustainable Development Goals a moving target travelling away from us. People

Nat. 2019; 1: 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.26 4. Free CM, Thorson JT, Pinsky ML, Oken KL, Wiedenmann J, Jensen OP. Impacts of historical warming on marine fisheries production. Science. 2019; 363: 979–983. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau1758 PMID: 30819962 5. Lotze HK, Tittensor DP, Bryndum-Buchholz A, Eddy TD, Cheung WWL, Galbraith ED, et al. Global ensemble projections reveal trophic amplification of ocean biomass declines with climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2019; 116: 12907–12912. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900194116 PMID: 31186360 6. Pinsky ML, Worm B, Fogarty MJ, Sarmiento JL, Levin SA. Marine taxa track local climate velocities. Sci- ence. 2013; 341: 1239–1242. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239352 PMID: 24031017 7. Poloczanska ES, Brown CJ, Sydeman WJ, Kiessling W, Schoeman DS, Moore PJ, et al. Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nat Clim Change. 2013; 3: 919–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nclimate1958 8. Poloczanska ES, Burrows MT, Brown CJ, Garcı´a Molinos J, Halpern BS, Hoegh-Guldberg O, et al. Responses of Marine Organisms to Climate Change across Oceans. Front Mar Sci. 2016; 3. https://doi. org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00062 9. Lam VWY, Cheung WWL, Reygondeau G, Sumaila UR. Projected change in global fisheries revenues under climate change. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 32607. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32607 PMID: 27600330 10. Blasiak R, Spijkers J, Tokunaga K, Pittman J, Yagi N, O¨ sterblom H. Climate change and marine fisher- ies: Least developed countries top global index of vulnerability. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12: e0179632.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179632 PMID: 28632781 PLOS ONE Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347 March 5, 2020 17 / 21

11. Guillotreau P, Campling L, Robinson J. Vulnerability of small island fishery economies to climate and institutional changes. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2012; 4: 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust. 2012.06.003 12. Allison EH, Perry AL, Badjeck MC, Neil Adger W, Brown K, Conway D, et al. Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish Fish. 2009; 10: 173–196. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00310.x 13. Barange M. Avoiding misinterpretation of climate change projections of fish catches. Browman H, edi- tor. ICES J Mar Sci J Cons. 2019; 4: 211–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz061 14. Holsman KK, Hazen EL, Haynie A, Gourguet S, Hollowed A, Bograd SJ, et al. Towards climate resil- iency in fisheries management. Anderson E, editor. ICES J Mar Sci. 2019; fsz031. https://doi.org/10. 1093/icesjms/fsz031 15. Szuwalski CS, Hollowed AB. Climate change and non-stationary population processes in fisheries man- agement. ICES J Mar Sci. 2016; 73: 1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv229 16. Costello C, Ovando D, Clavelle T, Strauss CK, Hilborn R, Melnychuk MC, et al. Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113: 5125–5129. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1520420113 PMID: 27035953 17. Pinsky ML, Reygondeau G, Caddell R, Palacios-Abrantes J, Spijkers J, Cheung WWL. Preparing ocean governance for species on the move. Science. 2018; 360: 1189–1191. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aat2360 PMID: 29903965

18. Spijkers J, Boonstra WJ. Environmental change and social conflict: the northeast Atlantic mackerel dis- pute. 2017; 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1150-4 19. Gaines SD, Costello C, Owashi B, Mangin T, Bone J, Molinos JG, et al. Improved fisheries manage- ment could offset many negative effects of climate change. Sci Adv. 2018; 4: eaao1378. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/sciadv.aao1378 PMID: 30167455 20. Neubauer P, Thorson JT, Melnychuk MC, Methot R, Blackhart K. Drivers and rates of stock assess- ments in the United States. MacKenzie BR, editor. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13: e0196483–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0196483 PMID: 29750789 21. Marshall KN, Koehn LE, Levin PS, Essington TE, Jensen OP, Handling editor: Marta Coll. Inclusion of ecosystem information in US fish stock assessments suggests progress toward ecosystem-based fish- eries management. ICES J Mar Sci J Cons. 2018; 76: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy152 22. Kaschner K, Kesner-Reyes K, Garilao C, Rius-Barile J, Rees T, Froese R. AquaMaps: Predicted range maps for aquatic species. 2019. https://www.aquamaps.org/ 23. Garcı´a Molinos J, Halpern BS, Schoeman DS, Brown CJ, Kiessling W, Moore PJ, et al. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat Clim Change. 2016; 6: 83–88. https://doi. org/10.1038/nclimate2769 24. Pella JJ, Tomlinson PK. A generalized stock production model. Inter-Am Trop Tuna Comm Bull. 1969; 13: 421–454. 25. Ricard D, Minto C, Jensen OP, Baum JK. Examining the knowledge base and status of commercially

exploited marine species with the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database. Fish Fish. 2012; 13: 380– 398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00435.x 26. Martell S, Froese R. A simple method for estimating MSY from catch and resilience. Fish Fish. 2013; 14: 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00485.x 27. Thorson JT, Cope JM, Branch TA, Jensen OP, Walters CJ. Spawning biomass reference points for exploited marine fishes, incorporating taxonomic and body size information. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2012; 69: 1556–1568. https://doi.org/10.1139/f2012-077 28. MacCall AD. Dynamic Geography of Marine Fish Populations. Washington Sea Grant Program; 1990. 29. Atkinson DB, Rose GA, Murphy EF, Bishop CA. Distribution changes and abundance of northern cod (Gadus morhua), 1981–1993. 1997; 54: 7. 30. Fisher JAD, Frank KT. Abundance-distribution relationships and conservation of exploited marine fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004; 279: 201–213. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps279201 31. Southward AJ, Hawkins SJ, Burrows MT. Seventy years’ observations of changes in distribution and abundance of zooplankton and intertidal organisms in the western English Channel in relation to rising sea temperature. J Therm Biol. 1995; 20: 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4565(94)00043-I 32. Zador S, Aydin K, Cope J. Fine-scale analysis of arrowtooth flounder Atherestes stomias catch rates reveals spatial trends in abundance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2011; 438: 229–239. https://doi.org/10.3354/ meps09316

33. Simpson MR, Walsh SJ. Changes in the spatial structure of Grand Bank yellowtail flounder: testing Mac- Call’s basin hypothesis. J Sea Res. 2004; 51: 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2003.08.007 PLOS ONE Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347 March 5, 2020 18 / 21

34. Sullivan MC, Cowen RK, Able KW, Fahay MP. Applying the basin model: Assessing habitat suitability of young-of-the-year demersal fishes on the New York Bight continental shelf. Cont Shelf Res. 2006; 26: 1551–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2006.03.012 35. Melnychuk MC, Clavelle T, Owashi B, Strauss K. Reconstruction of global ex-vessel prices of fished species. ICES J Mar Sci. 2017; 74: 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw169 36. Garcı´a Molinos J, Burrows MT, Poloczanska ES. Ocean currents modify the coupling between climate change and biogeographical shifts. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 1332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01309- y PMID: 28465575 37. Punt AE, A’mar T, Bond NA, Butterworth DS, de Moor CL, De Oliveira JAA, et al. Fisheries manage- ment under climate and environmental uncertainty: control rules and performance simulation. ICES J Mar Sci J Cons. 2014; 71: 2208–2220. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst057 38. Cheung WWL, Reygondeau G, Fro¨ licher TL. Large benefits to marine fisheries of meeting the 1.5˚C global warming target. Science. 2016; 354: 1591–1594. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2331 PMID: 28008069 39. Sumaila UR, Tai TC, Lam VWY, Cheung WWL, Bailey M, Cisneros-Montemayor AM, et al. Benefits of the Paris Agreement to ocean life, economies, and people. Sci Adv. 2019; 5: eaau3855. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/sciadv.aau3855 PMID: 30820450 40. Skern-Mauritzen M, Ottersen G, Handegard NO, Huse G, Dingsør GE, Stenseth NC, et al. Ecosystem processes are rarely included in tactical fisheries management. Fish Fish. 2015; 17: 165–175. https://

doi.org/10.1111/faf.12111 41. Rijnsdorp AD, Peck MA, Engelhard GH, Mo¨llman C, Pinnegar JK. Resolving the effect of climate change on fish populations. ICES J Mar Sci. 2009; 66: 1570–1583. 42. Mora C, Myers RA, Coll M, Libralato S, Pitcher TJ, Sumaila RU, et al. Management Effectiveness of the World’s Marine Fisheries. PLoS Biol. 2009; 7: e1000131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000131 PMID: 19547743 43. Bundy A, Chuenpagdee R, Boldt JL, de Fatima Borges M, Camara ML, Coll M, et al. Strong fisheries management and governance positively impact ecosystem status. Fish Fish. 2016; 18: 412–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12184 44. Golden CD, Allison EH, Cheung WWL, Dey MM, Halpern BS, McCauley DJ, et al. Nutrition: Fall in fish catch threatens human health. Nature. 2016; 534: 317–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/534317a PMID: 27306172 45. Pinsky ML, Mantua NJ. Emerging adaptation approaches for climate-ready fisheries management. Oceanography. 2014; 27: 146–159. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.93 46. Karp MA, Peterson JO, Lynch PD, Griffis RB, Adams CF, Arnold WS, et al. Accounting for shifting distri- butions and changing productivity in the development of scientific advice for fishery management. Mara- velias C, editor. ICES J Mar Sci. 2019; fsz048. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz048 47. Miller K, Charles A, Barange M, Brander K, Gallucci VF, Gasalla MA, et al. Climate change, uncertainty, and resilient fisheries: Institutional responses through integrative science. Prog Oceanogr. 2010; 87: 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2010.09.014

48. Ojea E, Pearlman I, Gaines SD, Lester SE. Fisheries regulatory regimes and resilience to climate change. Ambio. 2017; 46: 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0850-1 PMID: 27854068 49. Cinner JE, Adger WN, Allison EH, Barnes ML, Brown K, Cohen PJ, et al. Building adaptive capacity to climate change in tropical coastal communities. Nat Clim Change. 2018; 8: 117–123. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41558-017-0065-x 50. Miller TJ, Jones CM, Hanson C, Heppell S, Jensen OP, Livingston P, et al. Scientific Considerations Informing Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act Reauthorization. Fisheries. 2018; 43: 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsh.10179 51. NOAA. Status of Stocks 2017: Annual Report to Congress on the Status of U.S. Fisheries. 2018; 1–7. 52. Cochrane KL, Andrew NL, Parma AM. Primary fisheries management: a minimum requirement for pro- vision of sustainable human benefits in small-scale fisheries. Fish Fish. 2011; 12: 275–288. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00392.x 53. Costello C, Lynham J, Lester SE, Gaines SD. Economic Incentives and Global Fisheries Sustainability. Annu Rev Resour Econ. 2010; 2: 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.resource.012809.103923 54. Costello C, Gaines SD, Lynham J. Can Catch Shares Prevent Fisheries Collapse? Science. 2008; 321: 1678–1681. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159478 PMID: 18801999 55. Melnychuk MC, Essington TE, Branch TA, Heppell SS, Jensen OP, Link JS, et al. Can catch share fish- eries better track management targets? Fish Fish. 2011; 13: 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-

2979.2011.00429.x PLOS ONE Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347 March 5, 2020 19 / 21

56. Melnychuk MC, Peterson E, Elliott M, Hilborn R. Fisheries management impacts on target species sta- tus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114: 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609915114 PMID: 27994155 57. Hobday AJ, Spillman CM, Eveson JP, Hartog JR. Seasonal forecasting for decision support in marine fisheries and aquaculture. Fish Oceanogr. 2016; 25: 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12083 58. Hobday AJ, Spillman CM, Eveson JP, Hartog JR, Zhang X, Brodie S. A Framework for Combining Sea- sonal Forecasts and Climate Projections to Aid Risk Management for Fisheries and Aquaculture. Front Mar Sci. 2018; 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00137 59. Moore SS, Seavy NE, Gerhart M. Scenario planning for climate change adaptation: A guidance for resource managers. Point Blue Conservation Science and the California Coastal Conservancy; 2013. http://www.prbo.org/refs/files/12263_Moore2013.pdf 60. Robinson LM, Marzloff MP, van Putten I, Pecl G, Jennings S, Nicol S, et al. Structured Decision-Making Identifies Effective Strategies and Potential Barriers for Ecosystem-Based Management of a Range- Extending Species in a Global Marine Hotspot. Ecosystems. 2019; 22: 1573–1591. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10021-019-00358-w 61. Gaichas SK, Seagraves RJ, Coakley JM, DePiper GS, Guida VG, Hare JA, et al. A Framework for Incorporating Species, Fleet, Habitat, and Climate Interactions into Fishery Management. Front Mar Sci. 2016; 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00105

62. Metcalf SJ, van Putten EI, Frusher S, Marshall NA, Tull M, Caputi N, et al. Measuring the vulnerability of marine social-ecological systems: a prerequisite for the identification of climate change adaptations. Ecol Soc. 2015; 20. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270198 63. Holsman K, Samhouri J, Cook G, Hazen E, Olsen E, Dillard M, et al. An ecosystem-based approach to marine risk assessment. Ecosyst Health Sustain. 2017; 3: e01256. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1256 64. Hare JA, Morrison WE, Nelson MW, Stachura MM, Teeters EJ, Griffis RB, et al. A Vulnerability Assess- ment of Fish and Invertebrates to Climate Change on the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf. Hiddink JG, editor. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0146756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146756 PMID: 26839967 65. Hazen EL, Scales KL, Maxwell SM, Briscoe DK, Welch H, Bograd SJ, et al. A dynamic ocean manage- ment tool to reduce bycatch and support sustainable fisheries. Sci Adv. 2018; 4: eaar3001. https://doi. org/10.1126/sciadv.aar3001 PMID: 29854945 66. Tommasi D, Stock CA, Pegion K, Vecchi GA, Methot RD, Alexander MA, et al. Improved management of small pelagic fisheries through seasonal climate prediction. Ecol Appl. 2017; 27: 378–388. https://doi. org/10.1002/eap.1458 PMID: 28221708 67. Punt AE, Butterworth DS, Oliveira JAAD, Haddon M. Management strategy evaluation: best practices. Fish Fish. 2016; 17: 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12104 68. Richards LJ, Maguire J-J. Recent international agreements and the precautionary approach: new direc-

tions for fisheries management science. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1998; 55: 1545–1552. https://doi.org/10. 1139/f98-043 69. Hixon MA, Johnson DW, Sogard SM. BOFFFFs: on the importance of conserving old-growth age struc- ture in fishery populations. ICES J Mar Sci J Cons. 2014; 71: 2171–2185. https://doi.org/10.1093/ icesjms/fst200 70. Spijkers J, Singh G, Blasiak R, Morrison TH, Le Billon P, O¨ sterblom H. Global patterns of fisheries con- flict: Forty years of data. Glob Environ Change. 2019; 57: 101921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha. 2019.05.005 71. Havice E. Rights-based management in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean tuna fishery: Economic and environmental change under the Vessel Day Scheme. Mar Policy. 2013; 42: 259–267. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.003 72. Aqorau T, Bell J, Kittinger JN. Good governance for migratory species. Science. 2018; 361: 1208– 1209. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2051 PMID: 30237349 73. Serdy A. The New Entrants Problem in International Fisheries Law. In: Cambridge Core [Internet]. Feb 2016 [cited 3 Oct 2019]. 74. Miller KA, Munro GR. Climate and Cooperation: A New Perspective on the Management of Shared Fish Stocks. Mar Resour Econ. 2004; 19: 367–393. 75. Schatz VJ, Proelss A, Liu N. The 2018 Agreement to Prevent Unregulated High Seas Fisheries in the Central Arctic Ocean: A Critical Analysis. Int J Mar Coast Law. 2019; 34: 195–244. https://doi.org/10. 1163/15718085-23342015 76. Charles A. People, oceans and scale: governance, livelihoods and climate change adaptation in marine

social–ecological systems. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2012; 4: 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cosust.2012.05.011 PLOS ONE Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347 March 5, 2020 20 / 21

77. Fedele G, Donatti CI, Harvey CA, Hannah L, Hole DG. Transformative adaptation to climate change for sustainable social-ecological systems. Environ Sci Policy. 2019; 101: 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envsci.2019.07.001 78. Kasperski S, Holland DS. Income diversification and risk for fishermen. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110: 2076–2081. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212278110 PMID: 23341621 79. Cline TJ, Schindler DE, Hilborn R. Fisheries portfolio diversification and turnover buffer Alaskan fishing communities from abrupt resource and market changes. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 14042. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/ncomms14042 PMID: 28091534 80. Cinner JE, Daw T, McClanahan TR. Socioeconomic factors that affect artisanal fishers’ readiness to exit a declining fishery. Conserv Biol. 2009; 23: 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008. 01041.x PMID: 18778267 81. Daw TM, Cinner JE, McClanahan TR, Brown K, Stead SM, Graham NAJ, et al. To fish or not to fish: fac- tors at multiple scales affecting artisanal fishers’ readiness to exit a declining fishery. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7: e31460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031460 PMID: 22348090 82. Hughes TP, Bellwood DR, Folke C, Steneck RS, Wilson J. New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol. 2005; 20: 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.03. 022 PMID: 16701400 83. Gutie´ rrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisher- ies. Nature. 2011; 470: 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09689 PMID: 21209616

84. Moreno Andrea, Carmen Revenga. The system of territorial use rights in fisheries in Chile. Arlington, VA, USA: The Nature Conservancy; 2014 p. 88. 85. Willett W, Rockstro¨m J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the Anthropo- cene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet. 2019; 393: 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4 86. Gentry RR, Froehlich HE, Grimm D, Kareiva P, Parke M, Rust M, et al. Mapping the global potential for marine aquaculture. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017; 1: 1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0257-9 PMID: 29046547 87. emLab. Estimating the Ocean’s True Potential for Feeding the Planet. The Food and Land Use Coalition (FOLU); 2019. https://www.foodandlandusecoalition.org/knowledge-hub/ 88. Froehlich HE, Gentry RR, Halpern BS. Global change in marine aquaculture production potential under climate change. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018; 2: 1745–1750. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0669-1 PMID: 30201967 89. Klinger DH, Levin SA, Watson JR. The growth of finfish in global open-ocean aquaculture under climate change. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2017; 284: 20170834. PMID: 28978724 90. Davies IP, Carranza V, Froehlich HE, Gentry RR, Kareiva P, Halpern BS. Governance of marine aqua- culture: Pitfalls, potential, and pathways forward. Mar Policy. 2019; 104: 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.marpol.2019.02.054 91. Lester SE, Gentry RR, Kappel CV, White C, Gaines SD. Opinion: Offshore aquaculture in the United