Thông tin tài nguyên

Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries

pmc-PMC7058327.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 21 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 18 · Đoạn 45Vị trí nguồn

11. Guillotreau P, Campling L, Robinson J. Vulnerability of small island fishery economies to climate and institutional changes. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2012; 4: 287–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust. 2012.06.003 12. Allison EH, Perry AL, Badjeck MC, Neil Adger W, Brown K, Conway D, et al. Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish Fish. 2009; 10: 173–196. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00310.x 13. Barange M. Avoiding misinterpretation of climate change projections of fish catches. Browman H, edi- tor. ICES J Mar Sci J Cons. 2019; 4: 211–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz061 14. Holsman KK, Hazen EL, Haynie A, Gourguet S, Hollowed A, Bograd SJ, et al. Towards climate resil- iency in fisheries management. Anderson E, editor. ICES J Mar Sci. 2019; fsz031. https://doi.org/10. 1093/icesjms/fsz031 15. Szuwalski CS, Hollowed AB. Climate change and non-stationary population processes in fisheries man- agement. ICES J Mar Sci. 2016; 73: 1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsv229 16. Costello C, Ovando D, Clavelle T, Strauss CK, Hilborn R, Melnychuk MC, et al. Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113: 5125–5129. https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1520420113 PMID: 27035953 17. Pinsky ML, Reygondeau G, Caddell R, Palacios-Abrantes J, Spijkers J, Cheung WWL. Preparing ocean governance for species on the move. Science. 2018; 360: 1189–1191. https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aat2360 PMID: 29903965

Trang 18 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

18. Spijkers J, Boonstra WJ. Environmental change and social conflict: the northeast Atlantic mackerel dis- pute. 2017; 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1150-4 19. Gaines SD, Costello C, Owashi B, Mangin T, Bone J, Molinos JG, et al. Improved fisheries manage- ment could offset many negative effects of climate change. Sci Adv. 2018; 4: eaao1378. https://doi.org/ 10.1126/sciadv.aao1378 PMID: 30167455 20. Neubauer P, Thorson JT, Melnychuk MC, Methot R, Blackhart K. Drivers and rates of stock assess- ments in the United States. MacKenzie BR, editor. PLOS ONE. 2018; 13: e0196483–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0196483 PMID: 29750789 21. Marshall KN, Koehn LE, Levin PS, Essington TE, Jensen OP, Handling editor: Marta Coll. Inclusion of ecosystem information in US fish stock assessments suggests progress toward ecosystem-based fish- eries management. ICES J Mar Sci J Cons. 2018; 76: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsy152 22. Kaschner K, Kesner-Reyes K, Garilao C, Rius-Barile J, Rees T, Froese R. AquaMaps: Predicted range maps for aquatic species. 2019. https://www.aquamaps.org/ 23. Garcı´a Molinos J, Halpern BS, Schoeman DS, Brown CJ, Kiessling W, Moore PJ, et al. Climate velocity and the future global redistribution of marine biodiversity. Nat Clim Change. 2016; 6: 83–88. https://doi. org/10.1038/nclimate2769 24. Pella JJ, Tomlinson PK. A generalized stock production model. Inter-Am Trop Tuna Comm Bull. 1969; 13: 421–454. 25. Ricard D, Minto C, Jensen OP, Baum JK. Examining the knowledge base and status of commercially

Trang 18 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

exploited marine species with the RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database. Fish Fish. 2012; 13: 380– 398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00435.x 26. Martell S, Froese R. A simple method for estimating MSY from catch and resilience. Fish Fish. 2013; 14: 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00485.x 27. Thorson JT, Cope JM, Branch TA, Jensen OP, Walters CJ. Spawning biomass reference points for exploited marine fishes, incorporating taxonomic and body size information. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2012; 69: 1556–1568. https://doi.org/10.1139/f2012-077 28. MacCall AD. Dynamic Geography of Marine Fish Populations. Washington Sea Grant Program; 1990. 29. Atkinson DB, Rose GA, Murphy EF, Bishop CA. Distribution changes and abundance of northern cod (Gadus morhua), 1981–1993. 1997; 54: 7. 30. Fisher JAD, Frank KT. Abundance-distribution relationships and conservation of exploited marine fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004; 279: 201–213. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps279201 31. Southward AJ, Hawkins SJ, Burrows MT. Seventy years’ observations of changes in distribution and abundance of zooplankton and intertidal organisms in the western English Channel in relation to rising sea temperature. J Therm Biol. 1995; 20: 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4565(94)00043-I 32. Zador S, Aydin K, Cope J. Fine-scale analysis of arrowtooth flounder Atherestes stomias catch rates reveals spatial trends in abundance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2011; 438: 229–239. https://doi.org/10.3354/ meps09316

Trang 18 · Đoạn 48Vị trí nguồn

33. Simpson MR, Walsh SJ. Changes in the spatial structure of Grand Bank yellowtail flounder: testing Mac- Call’s basin hypothesis. J Sea Res. 2004; 51: 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2003.08.007 PLOS ONE Realistic fisheries management reforms could mitigate the impacts of climate change in most countries PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224347 March 5, 2020 18 / 21