Fertilization using manure minimizes the trade-offs between biodiversity and forage production in agri-environment scheme grasslands

Conserv. 2019; 232: 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020 2. Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos. 2011; 120: 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x. 3. Allinson J, Natural England, Garratt MPD, Breeze TD, Boreux V, Fountain MT, et al. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Nature. 2016; 11: 1351–1363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153889 4. Losey JE, Vaughan M. The Economic Value of Ecological Services Provided by Insects. Bioscience. 2006; 56: 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2006)56[311:TEVOES]2.0.CO;2 PLOS ONE Manure minimizes trade-offs between biodiversity and forage production in agri-environment scheme PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290843 October 4, 2023 15 / 18

5. IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Sci- ence-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondizio ES, Settele J, Dı´az S, Ngo HT, editors. Bonn: IPBES secretariat; 2019. 6. Baudron F, Govaerts B, Verhulst N, McDonald A, Ge´ rard B. Sparing or sharing land? Views from agri- cultural scientists. Biol Conserv. 2021; 259: 109167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109167. 7. Cullen P, Dupraz P, Moran J, Murphy P, O’Flaherty R, O’Donoghue C, et al. Agri-Environment Scheme Design: Past Lessons and Future Suggestions. EuroChoices. 2018; 17: 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1746-692X.12187. 8. Ravetto Enri S, Probo M, Farruggia A, Lanore L, Blanchetete A, Dumont B. A biodiversity-friendly rota- tional grazing system enhancing flower-visiting insect assemblages while maintaining animal and grass- land productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017; 241: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.030. 9. Poschlod P, WallisDeVries MF. The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands —lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol Conserv. 2002; 104: 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0006-3207(01)00201-4(01)00201-4. 10. Stoate C, Ba´ ldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, et al. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe–A review. J Environ Manage. 2009; 91: 22–46. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005 PMID: 19717221 11. Dengler J, Janisˇova´ M, To¨ ro¨k P, Wellstein C. Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: a synthesis. Agric

Ecosyst Environ. 2014; 182: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.015. 12. Smith RS, Shiel RS, Bardgett RD, Millward D, Corkhill P, Evans P, et al. Long-term change in vegetation and soil microbial communities during the phased restoration of traditional meadow grassland. J Appl Ecol. 2008; 45: 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01425.x 13. Cole AJ, Griffiths RI, Ward SE, Whitaker J, Ostle NJ, Bardgett RD. Grassland biodiversity restoration increases resistance of carbon fluxes to drought. J Appl Ecol. 2019; 56: 1806–1816. https://doi.org/10. 1111/1365-2664.13402 14. Stafford R, Chamberlain B, Clavey L, Gillingham PK, McKain S, Morecroft MD, et al. Nature-based Solutions for Climate Change in the UK: A Report by the British Ecological Society. London, UK; 2121. Available: www.britishecologicalsociety.org/nature-based-solutions%0A%0A. 15. Sutherland WJ, Dicks L V., Petrovan SO, Smith RK. What Works in Conservation 2021. 2021. Avail- able: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/1490. 16. Andrews J, Rebane M. Farming & Wildlife: a practical handbook for the management, restoration and creation of wildlife habitats on farmland. Sandy, Bedforshire, UK: The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.; 1994. 17. Primdahl J, Peco B, Schramek J, Andersen E, Oñate J. Environmental effects of agri-environment schemes in Western Europe. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00192-5 PMID: 12654274 18. Mla´ dkova´ P, Mla´dek J, Hejduk S, Hejcman M, Cruz P, Jouany C, et al. High-nature-value grasslands

have the capacity to cope with nutrient impoverishment induced by mowing and livestock grazing. J Appl Ecol. 2015; 52: 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12464. 19. Richards I, Genever L. Managing nutrients for better returns. Beef and sheep BRP manual 7. United Kingdom: BRP AHDB Beef & Lamb; 2016. Available: http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk. 20. Vickers M, Stewart K. Feeding growing and finishing cattle for better returns. Beef BRP manual 7. United Kingdom: BRP AHDB Beef & Lamb; 2016. Available: http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk. 21. Bignal EM, McCracken DI. Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside. J Appl Ecol. 1996; 33: 413–424. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404973 22. Craven D, Isbell F, Manning P, Connolly J, Bruelheide H, Ebeling A, et al. Plant diversity effects on grassland productivity are robust to both nutrient enrichment and drought. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2016;371. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0277 PMID: 27114579 23. French KE. Species composition determines forage quality and medicinal value of high diversity grass- lands in lowland England. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017; 241: 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee. 2017.03.012. 24. Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, et al. Redefining ecosystem mul- tifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018; 2: 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7 PMID: 29453352 25. Neyret M, Fischer M, Allan E, Ho¨ lzel N, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, et al. Assessing the impact of grass-

land management on landscape multifunctionality. Ecosyst Serv. 2021; 52: 101366. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ecoser.2021.101366 26. Grass I, Bata´ry P, Tscharntke T. Chapter Six—Combining land-sparing and land-sharing in European landscapes. In: Bohan DA, Vanbergen AJBT-A in ER, editors. The Future of Agricultural Landscapes, Part II. Academic Press; 2021. pp. 251–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.09.002. PLOS ONE Manure minimizes trade-offs between biodiversity and forage production in agri-environment scheme PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290843 October 4, 2023 16 / 18

27. Butsic V, Kuemmerle T. Using optimization methods to align food production and biodiversity conserva- tion beyond land sharing and land sparing. Ecol Appl. 2015; 25: 589–595. https://doi.org/10.1890/14- 1927.1 PMID: 26214906 28. Butsic V, Kuemmerle T, Pallud L, Helmstedt KJ, Macchi L, Potts MD. Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecol Appl. 2020; 30: e02057. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/eap.2057 PMID: 31837241 29. Simons NK, Lewinsohn T, Blu¨thgen N, Buscot F, Boch S, Daniel R, et al. Contrasting effects of grass- land management modes on species-abundance distributions of multiple groups. Agric Ecosyst Envi- ron. 2017; 237: 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.022 30. APIS. Summary of Nutrient Nitrogen Critical Loads from Noordwijkerhout Workshop. 2010. 31. De Long JR, Jackson BG, Wilkinson A, Pritchard WJ, Oakley S, Mason KE, et al. Relationships between plant traits, soil properties and carbon fluxes differ between monocultures and mixed commu- nities in temperate grassland. J Ecol. 2019; 107: 1704–1719. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13160 PMID: 31341333 32. Simpson NA, Jefferson RG. Use of farmyard manure on semi-natural (Meadow) grassland. Peterbor- ough; 1996. 33. Villa-Galaviz E, Smart SM, Clare EL, Ward SE, Memmott J. Differential effects of fertilisers on pollina- tion and parasitoid interaction networks. J Anim Ecol. 2021; 90: 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2656.13373 PMID: 33067860

34. Allinson J, Natural England. Botanical surveys of Colt Park Meadows experimental plots 2010–2014, Ingleborough National Nature Reserve. 2014. 35. Ward SE, Wilby A, Bardgett R. Managing grassland diversity for multiple ecosystem services. Final report, Defra Proj BD 5003. Lancaster; 2016. Available: http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Default. aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=17251. 36. Baude M, Kunin WE, Boatman ND, Conyers S, Davies N, Gillespie MAK, et al. Historical nectar assess- ment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain. Nature. 2016; 530: 85–88. https://doi.org/10. 1038/nature16532 PMID: 26842058 37. Edgington ES. Randomization Tests BT—International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. In: Lovric M, editor. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 1182–1183. https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-642-04898-2_56 38. Nuzzo RL. Randomization Test: An Alternative Analysis for the Difference of Two Means. PM&R. 2017; 9: 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.001 PMID: 28237692 39. Gotelli NJ, Ulrich W, Maestre FT. Randomization tests for quantifying species importance to ecosystem function. Methods Ecol Evol. 2011; 2: 634–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00121.x. 40. Farine DR, Whitehead H. Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. J Anim Ecol. 2015; 84: 1144–1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12418 PMID: 26172345 41. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: Community Ecol-

ogy Package. R package version 2.5–4. 2019. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan. 42. Wickham H. dtplyr: Data table back-end for “dplyr”. R package version 0.0.2. 2017. Available: https:// cran.r-project.org/package=dtplyr. 43. Wickham H. The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis. 2011th-04–07 ed. 2011. https://doi. org/10.18637/jss.v040.i01 44. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York; 2009. Available: http://ggplot2.org. 45. Harrell FE. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. 2021. Available: https://cran.r-project.org/package=Hmisc. 46. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Stat Comput. 2022. Available: http://www.r-project.org/. 47. Fraser MD, Vale JE, Dhanoa MS. Alternative upland grazing systems: Impacts on livestock perfor- mance and sward characteristics. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2013; 175: 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. agee.2013.05.002. 48. Chesterton C. Environmental impacts of land management. Natural England Research Report NERR030; 2009. Available: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/30026. 49. FarmIQ. The FeedSmart feed calculator. 2016 [cited 15 Mar 2021]. Available: https://www.feedsmart. co.nz. 50. AHDB. Nutrient Management Guide (RB209). 2019. Available: https://ahdb.org.uk/nutrient- management-guide-rb209. PLOS ONE Manure minimizes trade-offs between biodiversity and forage production in agri-environment scheme PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290843 October 4, 2023 17 / 18

51. Simons NK, Weisser WW. Agricultural intensification without biodiversity loss is possible in grassland landscapes. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017; 1: 1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0227-2 PMID: 29046565 52. DAERA. How succesful was your lambing? 2018 [cited 12 Jan 2022]. Available: https://www.daera-ni. gov.uk/news/how-successful-was-your-lambing. 53. Natural England. Entry Level Stewardship, Environmental Stewarhip Handbook. Fourth. 2013. 54. Muller A, Schader C, El-Hage Scialabba N, Bru¨ ggemann J, Isensee A, Erb K-H, et al. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nat Commun. 2017; 8: 1290. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-017-01410-w PMID: 29138387 55. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and human well-being: current state and trends. Wash- ington: Island Press; 2005. 56. Gamble D, St. Pierre T. Hay Time in the Yorkshire Dales. Lancaster: Yorkshire Dales Millennium Trust/Scotforth Books; 2012. 57. Bittman S, Forge TA, Kowalenko CG. Responses of the bacterial and fungal biomass in a grassland soil to multi-year applications of dairy manure slurry and fertilizer. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005; 37: 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.038. 58. Gaujour E, Amiaud B, Mignolet C, Plantureux S. Factors and processes affecting plant biodiversity in permanent grasslands. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 2012; 32: 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/S1_ File3593-011-0015-3 59. Smith RS, Shiel RS, Bardgett RD, Millward D, Evans P, Harrison K, et al. The colt park field trial: long-

66. Schofield L. Wild Fell: Fighting for nature on a Lake District hill farm. Transworld; 2022. 67. DEFRA. Mid Tier and Wildlife Offers manual for 1 January 2021 agreements: Countryside Stewardship. 2021. 68. Estrada-Carmona N, Sa´nchez AC, Remans R, Jones SK. Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2022; 119: e2203385119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203385119 PMID: 36095174 69. Blaauw BR, Isaacs R. Flower plantings increase wild bee abundance and the pollination services pro- vided to a pollination-dependent crop. J Appl Ecol. 2014; 51: 890–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365- 2664.12257 PLOS ONE Manure minimizes trade-offs between biodiversity and forage production in agri-environment scheme PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290843 October 4, 2023 18 / 18