Fertilization using manure minimizes the trade-offs between biodiversity and forage production in agri-environment scheme grasslands

5. IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Sci- ence-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondizio ES, Settele J, Dı´az S, Ngo HT, editors. Bonn: IPBES secretariat; 2019. 6. Baudron F, Govaerts B, Verhulst N, McDonald A, Ge´ rard B. Sparing or sharing land? Views from agri- cultural scientists. Biol Conserv. 2021; 259: 109167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109167. 7. Cullen P, Dupraz P, Moran J, Murphy P, O’Flaherty R, O’Donoghue C, et al. Agri-Environment Scheme Design: Past Lessons and Future Suggestions. EuroChoices. 2018; 17: 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1746-692X.12187. 8. Ravetto Enri S, Probo M, Farruggia A, Lanore L, Blanchetete A, Dumont B. A biodiversity-friendly rota- tional grazing system enhancing flower-visiting insect assemblages while maintaining animal and grass- land productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017; 241: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.02.030. 9. Poschlod P, WallisDeVries MF. The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands —lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol Conserv. 2002; 104: 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0006-3207(01)00201-4(01)00201-4. 10. Stoate C, Ba´ ldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, et al. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe–A review. J Environ Manage. 2009; 91: 22–46. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005 PMID: 19717221 11. Dengler J, Janisˇova´ M, To¨ ro¨k P, Wellstein C. Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: a synthesis. Agric

Ecosyst Environ. 2014; 182: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.12.015. 12. Smith RS, Shiel RS, Bardgett RD, Millward D, Corkhill P, Evans P, et al. Long-term change in vegetation and soil microbial communities during the phased restoration of traditional meadow grassland. J Appl Ecol. 2008; 45: 670–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01425.x 13. Cole AJ, Griffiths RI, Ward SE, Whitaker J, Ostle NJ, Bardgett RD. Grassland biodiversity restoration increases resistance of carbon fluxes to drought. J Appl Ecol. 2019; 56: 1806–1816. https://doi.org/10. 1111/1365-2664.13402 14. Stafford R, Chamberlain B, Clavey L, Gillingham PK, McKain S, Morecroft MD, et al. Nature-based Solutions for Climate Change in the UK: A Report by the British Ecological Society. London, UK; 2121. Available: www.britishecologicalsociety.org/nature-based-solutions%0A%0A. 15. Sutherland WJ, Dicks L V., Petrovan SO, Smith RK. What Works in Conservation 2021. 2021. Avail- able: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/1490. 16. Andrews J, Rebane M. Farming & Wildlife: a practical handbook for the management, restoration and creation of wildlife habitats on farmland. Sandy, Bedforshire, UK: The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.; 1994. 17. Primdahl J, Peco B, Schramek J, Andersen E, Oñate J. Environmental effects of agri-environment schemes in Western Europe. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00192-5 PMID: 12654274 18. Mla´ dkova´ P, Mla´dek J, Hejduk S, Hejcman M, Cruz P, Jouany C, et al. High-nature-value grasslands

have the capacity to cope with nutrient impoverishment induced by mowing and livestock grazing. J Appl Ecol. 2015; 52: 1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12464. 19. Richards I, Genever L. Managing nutrients for better returns. Beef and sheep BRP manual 7. United Kingdom: BRP AHDB Beef & Lamb; 2016. Available: http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk. 20. Vickers M, Stewart K. Feeding growing and finishing cattle for better returns. Beef BRP manual 7. United Kingdom: BRP AHDB Beef & Lamb; 2016. Available: http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk. 21. Bignal EM, McCracken DI. Low-intensity farming systems in the conservation of the countryside. J Appl Ecol. 1996; 33: 413–424. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404973 22. Craven D, Isbell F, Manning P, Connolly J, Bruelheide H, Ebeling A, et al. Plant diversity effects on grassland productivity are robust to both nutrient enrichment and drought. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2016;371. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0277 PMID: 27114579 23. French KE. Species composition determines forage quality and medicinal value of high diversity grass- lands in lowland England. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2017; 241: 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee. 2017.03.012. 24. Manning P, van der Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, et al. Redefining ecosystem mul- tifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018; 2: 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7 PMID: 29453352 25. Neyret M, Fischer M, Allan E, Ho¨ lzel N, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, et al. Assessing the impact of grass-

land management on landscape multifunctionality. Ecosyst Serv. 2021; 52: 101366. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ecoser.2021.101366 26. Grass I, Bata´ry P, Tscharntke T. Chapter Six—Combining land-sparing and land-sharing in European landscapes. In: Bohan DA, Vanbergen AJBT-A in ER, editors. The Future of Agricultural Landscapes, Part II. Academic Press; 2021. pp. 251–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.09.002. PLOS ONE Manure minimizes trade-offs between biodiversity and forage production in agri-environment scheme PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290843 October 4, 2023 16 / 18