Wind disasters adaptation in cities in a changing climate: A systematic review

future. By collecting socio-economic and meteorological data of cities, common features may be identified for cities that are more active in adapting to wind disasters. Supporting information S1 Checklist. PRISMA checklist. (DOC) S1 Table. List of publications and statistic results. (XLSX) S2 Table. List of cities and their frequencies. (XLSX) S3 Table. Quality assessment. (XLSX) S1 Appendix. The final search queries for Web of Science and Scopus. (DOCX) S2 Appendix. A templet for targeted information in the literature corpus. (DOCX) Acknowledgments We would like to thank Rui Wang and Shuyun Mei for doing the full-text review of articles and filling the targeted information in supporting materials. We would like to thank Celine Yeap for helping us to polish the language. And we would like to thank all the editors and reviewers for their wonderful comments and suggestions. Author Contributions Conceptualization: Yue He, Boqun Wu, Beibei Liu. Data curation: Yue He, Boqun Wu, Pan He. Formal analysis: Yue He, Boqun Wu, Pan He. PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 16 / 26

Visualization: Yue He, Boqun Wu, Weiyi Gu. Writing – original draft: Yue He. Writing – review & editing: Yue He, Pan He, Weiyi Gu, Beibei Liu. References 1. Bloomberg M. A stronger, more resilient New York. New York: City of New York Mayor’s Office. 2013. Available: http://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/sirr/SIRR_singles_Lo_res.pdf 2. Yang Q, Gao R, Bai F, Li T, Tamura Y. Damage to buildings and structures due to recent devastating wind hazards in East Asia. Nat Hazards. 2018; 92: 1321–1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018- 3253-8 3. Zampieri NE, Pau S, Okamoto DK. The impact of Hurricane Michael on longleaf pine habitats in Flor- ida. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10: 8483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65436-9 PMID: 32439960 4. Irfan FB, Pathan SA, Bhutta ZA, Abbasy ME, Elmoheen A, Elsaeidy AM, et al. Health system response and adaptation to the largest sandstorm in the Middle East. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017; 11: 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2016.111 PMID: 27539443 5. D. Guha-Sapir. EM-DAT: The Emergency Events Datebase. [cited 5 Dec 2020]. Available: https:// public.emdat.be/data 6. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters (2020). https://doi.org/10.25921/STKW-7W73 7. The Lancet Planetary Health. Hurricanes and architecture: adaptation to the destruction. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2018; 2: e414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30204-3 PMID: 30318093 8. Finlayson CM, D’Cruz R, Davidson N, Alder J, Cork S, Groot RD, et al. Ecosystems and human well-

being: wetlands and water synthesis. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2005. 9. Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor MMB, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al. Climate change 2013: The physical science basi: Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovern- mental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press; 2013. 10. Stewart MG, Wang X, Willgoose GR. Direct and indirect cost-and-benefit assessment of climate adap- tation strategies for housing for extreme wind events in Queensland. Nat Hazards Rev. 2014; 15: 04014008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000136 11. Stewart MG. Risk and economic viability of housing climate adaptation strategies for wind hazards in southeast Australia. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2015; 20: 601–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11027-013-9510-y 12. Atkinson RW, Kang S, Anderson HR, Mills IC, Walton HA. Epidemiological time series studies of PM 2.5 and daily mortality and hospital admissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2014; 69: 660–665. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204492 PMID: 24706041 13. Hurricane and tropical storm watches, warnings, advisories and outlooks. NOAA’s National Weather Service; [cited 1 Dec 2020]. Available: https://www.weather.gov/safety/hurricane-ww 14. Shanghai Meteorological Bureau, CMA. Overview of Shanghai multi-hazard early warning system and the role of meteorological services. 2010. Available: https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/drr/events/ MHEWSCostaRica/Docs/Session%202/Shanghai/Shanghai_MHEWS_CostaRica.pdf

15. Emanuel KA. The dependence of hurricane intensity on climate. Nature. 1987; 326: 483–485. https:// doi.org/10.1038/326483a0 16. McGranahan G, Balk D, Anderson B. The rising tide: Assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and Urbanization. 2007; 19: 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247807076960 17. Woodruff JD, Irish JL, Camargo SJ. Coastal flooding by tropical cyclones and sea-level rise. Nature. 2013; 504: 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12855 PMID: 24305147 18. Trenberth K. Uncertainty in Hurricanes and Global Warming. Science. 2005; 308: 1753–1754. https:// doi.org/10.1126/science.1112551 PMID: 15961661 19. Lin N, Emanuel K, Oppenheimer M, Vanmarcke E. Physically based assessment of hurricane surge threat under climate change. Nature Clim Change. 2012; 2: 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nclimate1389 20. Mendelsohn R, Emanuel K, Chonabayashi S, Bakkensen L. The impact of climate change on global tropical cyclone damage. Nature Climate Change. 2012; 2: 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nclimate1357 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 17 / 26

21. Landsea CW, Harper BA, Hoarau K, Knaff JA. Can we detect trends in xxtreme tropical cyclones? Sci- ence. 2006; 313: 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128448 PMID: 16873634 22. Knutson TR, McBride JL, Chan J, Emanuel K, Holland G, Landsea C, et al. Tropical cyclones and cli- mate change. Nat Geosci. 2010; 3: 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo779 23. Tamura Y. Wind-induced damage to buildings and disaster risk reduction. Taipei, Taiwan; 2009. 24. Issa A, Ramadugu K, Mulay P, Hamilton J, Siegel V, Harrison C, et al. Deaths related to Hurricane Irma—Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina, September 4–October 10, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018; 67: 829–832. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6730a5 PMID: 30070979 25. Tan C, Fang W. Mapping the wind hazard of global tropical cyclones with parametric wind field models by considering the effects of local factors. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2018; 9: 86–99. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s13753-018-0161-1 26. CDP Open Data Portal. [cited 5 Dec 2020]. Available: https://data.cdp.net/browse?category=Climate +Hazards 27. Droste AM, Steeneveld GJ, Holtslag AAM. Introducing the urban wind island effect. Environ Res Lett. 2018; 13: 094007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aad8ef 28. Blocken B, Carmeliet J, Stathopoulos T. CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings—effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric bound- ary layer flow. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2007; 95: 941–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.01. 013

29. Dutt AJ. Wind flow in an urban environment. Environ Monit Assess. 1991; 19: 495–506. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF00401336 PMID: 24233964 30. Rosenzweig C, Solecki W. Hurricane Sandy and adaptation pathways in New York: Lessons from a first-responder city. Global Environmental Change. 2014; 28: 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gloenvcha.2014.05.003 31. Godschalk DR. Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Nat Hazards Rev. 2003; 4: 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:3(136) 32. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J. A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations: A letter. Clim Change. 2011; 106: 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011- 0045-5 33. Araos M, Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Austin SE, Biesbroek R, Lesnikowski A. Climate change adapta- tion planning in large cities: A systematic global assessment. Environ Sci Policy. 2016; 66: 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.009 34. Georgeson L, Maslin M, Poessinouw M, Howard S. Adaptation responses to climate change differ between global megacities. Nature Clim Change. 2016; 6: 584–588. https://doi.org/10.1038/ nclimate2944 35. Whitmarsh L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J Risk Res. 2008; 11: 351–374. https:// doi.org/10.1080/13669870701552235 36. Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Bjo¨rk B-C, Hedlund T. The development of open access

journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. Hermes-Lima M, editor. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e20961. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961 PMID: 21695139 37. Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, et al. The state of OA: A large- scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles. PeerJ. 2018; 6: e4375. https:// doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375 PMID: 29456894 38. Wang X, Liu C, Mao W, Fang Z. The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics. 2015; 103: 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015- 1547-0 39. Vogel B, Henstra D. Studying local climate adaptation: A heuristic research framework for comparative policy analysis. Glob Environ Change. 2015; 31: 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015. 01.001 40. Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Romero-Lankao P, Mehrotra S, Dhakal S. Climate change and cities: Sec- ond assessment report of the urban climate change research network. Cambridge University Press; 2018. 41. Mongeon P, Paul-Hus A. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analy- sis. Scientometrics. 2016; 106: 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 42. Gavel Y, Iselid L. Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study. Online Inf Rev. 2008; 32: 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810865958 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 18 / 26

43. Vera-Baceta M-A, Thelwall M, Kousha K. Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Sciento- metrics. 2019; 121: 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03264-z 44. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB j. 2008; 22: 338–342. https://doi.org/10. 1096/fj.07-9492LSF PMID: 17884971 45. Jelodar H, Wang Y, Yuan C, Feng X, Jiang X, Li Y, et al. Latent dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: Models, applications, a survey. Multimed Tools Appl. 2019; 78: 15169–15211. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11042-018-6894-4 46. Blei DM, NG AY, Jordan MI. Latent dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res. 2003; 3: 993–1022. 47. Lamb WF, Callaghan MW, Creutzig F, Khosla R, Minx JC. The literature landscape on 1.5˚C climate change and cities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2018; 30: 26–34. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.02.008 48. Lamb WF, Creutzig F, Callaghan MW, Minx JC. Learning about urban climate solutions from case studies. Nat Clim Chang. 2019; 9: 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0440-x 49. Wang Y-X, Zhang Y-J. Nonnegative matrix factorization: A comprehensive review. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2013; 25: 1336–1353. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2012.51 50. McCallum A, Mimno DM, Wallach HM. Rethinking LDA: Why priors matter. In: Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty JD, Williams CKI, Culotta A, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems 22. 2009. pp. 1973–1981.

51. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assess- ment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva, Switzerland; 2015. 52. Chan J, DuBois B, Tidball KG. Refuges of local resilience: Community gardens in post-Sandy New York City. Urban For Urban Green. 2015; 14: 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.005 53. Amante CJ. Uncertain seas: Probabilistic modeling of future coastal flood zones. Int J Geogr Inf Sci. 2019; 33: 2188–2217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2019.1635253 54. Lontone A, Ernsˇteins R, Lagzdin¸a E¯ , Vanaga M, Sˇ teinberga Z. Flood risk governance and communica- tion development for coastal municipalities: Information and education, participation and practise self- experience. 2017. pp. 373–385. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2017/52 55. Gopalakrishnan T, Hasan MK, Haque ATMS, Jayasinghe SL, Kumar L. Sustainability of coastal agri- culture under climate change. Sustainability. 2019; 11: 7200. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247200 56. Lee Y-J. A synthesized biophysical and social vulnerability assessment for Taiwan. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2017; 94: 012161. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/94/1/012161 57. Ayeb-Karlsson S, van der Geest K, Ahmed I, Huq S, Warner K. A people-centred perspective on cli- mate change, environmental stress, and livelihood resilience in Bangladesh. Sustain Sci. 2016; 11: 679–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0379-z PMID: 30174739

58. Chuang W-C, Eason T, Garmestani A, Roberts C. Impact of Hurricane Katrina on the coastal systems of southern Louisiana. Front Environ Sci. 2019; 7: 68. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00068 PMID: 32601598 59. Hopper T, Meixler MS. Modeling coastal vulnerability through space and time. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11: e0163495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163495 PMID: 27732674 60. Lane K, Charles-Guzman K, Wheeler K, Abid Z, Graber N, Matte T. Health effects of coastal storms and flooding in urban areas: A review and vulnerability assessment. J Environ Public Health. 2013; 2013: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/913064 PMID: 23818911 61. Ghaffarian S, Kerle N, Filatova T. Remote sensing-based proxies for urban disaster risk management and resilience: A Review. Remote Sens. 2018; 10: 1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111760 62. Kim HG, Lee DK, Jung H, Kil S-H, Park JH, Park C, et al. Finding key vulnerable areas by a climate change vulnerability assessment. Nat Hazards. 2016; 81: 1683–1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11069-016-2151-1 63. Estember RD, Abiog MCM. Vulnerability assessment of Pangasinan province to typhoons, floods and landslides. Bandung, Indonesia; 2018. p. 020060. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5080873 64. Serafim MB, Bonetti J. Vulnerability of Santa Catarina Beaches to coastal erosion and flooding: A methodological approach based on a multicriterial index. Quat Environ Geosci. 2017; 8: 36–54. https://doi.org/10.5380/abequa.v8i2.47281 65. Mallari Ezra CA. Climate change vulnerability assessment in the agriculture sector: Typhoon Santi

experience. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016; 216: 440–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12. 058 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 19 / 26

66. Anita Martı´nez Me´ ndez, Oscar Frausto Martı´nez, Lourdes Castillo Villanueva, Jose´ Manuel Camacho Sanabria. Index of Potable Water Infrastructure Resilience Facing Hurricanes in Coastal Cities. REVGEO. 2018; 3: 339–365. https://doi.org/10.15359/rgac.61-3.17 67. Sharifi A, Yamagata Y. Resilient urban planning: Major principles and criteria. Energy Procedia. 2014; 61: 1491–1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.154 68. Frausto O, Vazquez A, Arroyo L, Castillo L, Herna´ndez ML. Hurricane resilience indicators in mexican caribbean coastal cities. Int J SAFE. 2016; 6: 755–763. https://doi.org/10.2495/SAFE-V6-N4-755-763 69. Simonovic SP, Peck A. Dynamic Resilience to Climate Change Caused Natural Disasters in Coastal Megacities Quantification Framework. BJECC. 2013; 3: 378–401. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJECC/ 2013/2504 70. Graham L, Debucquoy W, Anguelovski I. The influence of urban development dynamics on community resilience practice in New York City after Superstorm Sandy: Experiences from the Lower East Side and the Rockaways. Glob Environ Change. 2016; 40: 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha. 2016.07.001 71. McMillen H, Campbell L, Svendsen E, Reynolds R. Recognizing stewardship practices as indicators of social resilience: In living memorials and in a community garden. Sustainability. 2016; 8: 775. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su8080775 72. Sajjad M, Li Y, Tang Z, Cao L, Liu X. Assessing hazard vulnerability, habitat conservation, and restora- tion for the enhancement of mainland China’s coastal resilience. Earth’s Future. 2018; 6: 326–338.

https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000676 73. Pe´rez-Maqueo O, Martı´nez M, Sa´nchez-Barradas F, Kolb M. Assessing nature-based coastal protec- tion against disasters derived from extreme hydrometeorological events in Mexico. Sustainability. 2018; 10: 1317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051317 74. Tidball KG. Seeing the forest for the trees: Hybridity and social-ecological symbols, rituals and resil- ience in postdisaster contexts. E&S. 2014; 19: art25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06903-190425 75. Mosley S. Coastal cities and environmental change. Environ Hist Camb. 2014; 20: 517–533. https:// doi.org/10.3197/096734014X14091313617280 76. Otero FG. Methodology for the monitoring of the mangrove recovery in the mouth of the San Cristobal River. Revista Cubana de Ciencias Forestales. 2018; 6: 240–256. 77. Bures R, Kanapaux W. Historical regimes and social indicators of resilience in an urban system: the case of Charleston, South Carolina. E&S. 2011; 16: art16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04293-160416 78. Gotham KF, Campanella R. Coupled vulnerability and resilience: the dynamics of cross-scale interac- tions in post-Katrina New Orleans. E&S. 2011; 16: art12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04292-160312 79. Rahman S, Rahman MA. Climate extremes and challenges to infrastructure development in coastal cities in Bangladesh. Weather Clim Extremes. 2015; 7: 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2014. 07.004 80. Cui W, Caracoglia L. Exploring hurricane wind speed along US Atlantic coast in warming climate and

effects on predictions of structural damage and intervention costs. Eng Struct. 2016; 122: 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.003 81. Wilbanks TJ, Fernandez S, Backus G, Garcia P, Jonietz KK, Kirshen PH, et al. Climate change and infrastructure, urban systems, and vulnerabilities: Technical report for the U.S. Department of Energy in support of the national climate assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2014. https://doi.org/ 10.5822/978-1-61091-556-4 82. Hallegatte S, Ranger N, Mestre O, Dumas P, Corfee-Morlot J, Herweijer C, et al. Assessing climate change impacts, sea level rise and storm surge risk in port cities: a case study on Copenhagen. Cli- matic Change. 2011; 104: 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9978-3 83. Eadie P, Su Y. Post-disaster social capital: trust, equity, bayanihan and Typhoon Yolanda. Disaster Prev and Management. 2018; 27: 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-02-2018-0060 84. Raza T. Localizing disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation in planners’ and decision makers’ agenda: Technical comprehensive model, Quezon City, Philippines. Procedia Engineering. 2018; 212: 1311–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.169 85. Ke Q, Haasnoot M, Hoogvliet M. Exploring adaptation pathways in terms of flood risk management at a city scale–a case study for Shanghai city. Lang M, Klijn F, Samuels P, editors. E3S Web Conf. 2016; 7: 21002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160721002 86. Williams S, Ismail N. Climate change, coastal vulnerability and the need for adaptation alternatives:

Planning and design examples from Egypt and the USA. J Mar Sci Eng. 2015; 3: 591–606. https://doi. org/10.3390/jmse3030591 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 20 / 26

87. De Lotto R, Gazzola Cecilia Morelli di Popolo V, Maria Venco E. From resilience to flexibility: Urban scenario to reduce hazard. Int J SDP. 2017; 12: 789–799. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N4-789- 799 88. Solecki W, Pelling M, Garschagen M. Transitions between risk management regimes in cities. E&S. 2017; 22: art38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09102-220238 89. Kiddle G, McEvoy D, Mitchell D, Jones P, Mecartney S. Unpacking the pacific urban agenda: Resil- ience challenges and opportunities. Sustainability. 2017; 9: 1878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101878 90. Magee AD, Verdon-Kidd DC, Kiem AS, Royle SA. Tropical cyclone perceptions, impacts and adapta- tion in the Southwest Pacific: An urban perspective from Fiji, Vanuatu and Tonga. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2016; 16: 1091–1105. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1091-2016 91. Lin N, Shullman E. Dealing with hurricane surge flooding in a changing environment: part I. Risk assessment considering storm climatology change, sea level rise, and coastal development. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2017; 31: 2379–2400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1377-5 92. Tavakkolifard A, Ghasemieh H, Samani AAN, Mashhadi N. Determining the risk of sand transportation to residential areas around Kashan Erg using anemometry data analysis. Desert. 2013; 10: 163–172. 93. Grøntoft T. Observed recent change in climate and potential for decay of Norwegian wood structures. Climate. 2019; 7: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7020033 94. Baijnath-Rodino JA, Duguay CR. Historical spatiotemporal trends in snowfall extremes over the Cana-

dian domain of the Great Lakes Basin. Adv Meteorol. 2018; 2018: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/ 5404123 95. Borja Baeza RC, Alca´ ntara Ayala I. Mass movement processes and associated risks in Zacapoaxtla, Puebla. Investigaciones Geogra´ ficas. 2012; 7. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.30197 96. Song Y-K, Oh J, Son Y-J, Jung M. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility using scientific investigation and quantitative evaluation. IJDRBC. 2013; 4: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijdrbc.2013.4.01 97. Freeman AC, Ashley WS. Changes in the US hurricane disaster landscape: the relationship between risk and exposure. Nat Hazards. 2017; 88: 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2885-4 98. Klose CD. Evidence for higher tropical storm risks in Haiti due to increasing population density in haz- ard prone urban areas. Environ Res Lett. 2011; 6: 044020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/ 044020 99. Small MJ, Xian S. A human-environmental network model for assessing coastal mitigation decisions informed by imperfect climate studies. Glob Environ Change. 2018; 53: 137–145. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.006 100. Dark SM. The unconscious mind rules in absentia. WIT Trans Ecol Environ. 2016; 204: 599–610. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC160501 101. Fussell E, Sastry N, VanLandingham M. Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Popul Environ. 2010; 31: 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009- 0092-2 PMID: 20440381 102. Reckien D, Petkova EP. Who is responsible for climate change adaptation? Environ Res Lett. 2019;

14: 014010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf07a 103. Juanzon JBP, Oreta AWC. An assessment on the effective preparedness and disaster response: The case of Santa Rosa City, Laguna. Procedia Engineering. 2018; 212: 929–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.proeng.2018.01.120 104. van Ree CCDF, Van MA, Heilemann K, Morris MW, Royet P, Zevenbergen C. FloodProBE: Technolo- gies for improved safety of the built environment in relation to flood events. Environ Sci Policy. 2011; 14: 874–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.03.010 105. Ro¨ zer V, Kreibich H, Schro¨ ter K, Mu¨ ller M, Sairam N, Doss-Gollin J, et al. Probabilistic models signifi- cantly reduce uncertainty in Hurricane Harvey pluvial flood loss estimates. Earth’s Future. 2019; 7: 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001074 106. Czajkowski J, Villarini G, Montgomery M, Michel-Kerjan E, Goska R. Assessing current and future freshwater flood risk from North Atlantic tropical cyclones via insurance claims. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 41609. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41609 PMID: 28148952 107. Smith JB, Strzepek KM, Cardini J, Castaneda M, Holland J, Quiroz C, et al. Coping with climate vari- ability and climate change in La Ceiba, Honduras. Clim Change. 2011; 108: 457–470. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10584-011-0161-2 108. Lian JJ, Xu K, Ma C. Joint impact of rainfall and tidal level on flood risk in a coastal city with a complex river network: a case study for Fuzhou city, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. 2012; 9: 7475– 7505. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-7475-2012 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 21 / 26

109. Yang D, Yang A, Qiu H, Zhou Y, Herrero H, Fu C-S, et al. A citizen-contributed GIS approach for evalu- ating the impacts of land use on Hurricane-Harvey-induced flooding in Houston area. Land. 2019; 8: 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/land8020025 110. Armenakis C, Nirupama N. Flood risk mapping for the city of Toronto. Procedia Econ Financ. 2014; 18: 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00946-0 111. Shi Y, Zhai G, Zhou S, Lu Y, Chen W, Deng J. How can cities respond to flood disaster risks under multi-scenario simulation? A case study of Xiamen, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040618 PMID: 30791558 112. Zhang J, Chen Y. Risk assessment of flood disaster induced by typhoon rainstorms in Guangdong Province, China. Sustainability. 2019; 11: 2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102738 113. Peng B, Meng Z, Huang Q, Wang C. Patch similarity convolutional neural network for urban flood extent mapping using bi-temporal satellite multispectral imagery. Remote Sens. 2019; 11: 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212492 114. Depietri Y, Dahal K, McPhearson T. Multi-hazard risks in New York City. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2018; 18: 3363–3381. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-3363-2018 115. de Sherbin A, Bardy G. Social vulnerability to floods in two coastal megacities: New York City and Mumbai. Vienna Yearb Popul Res. 2016; 1: 131–165. https://doi.org/10.1553/ populationyearbook2015s131 116. Miller MM, Shirzaei M. Land subsidence in Houston correlated with flooding from Hurricane Harvey.

Remote Sens Environ. 2019; 225: 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.03.022 117. Sousa M.Y.R., Hideki Takayasu, Misako Takayasu, Michael Harre´ , Jean-Franc¸ois Boilard, Joshin Murai, et al. Proceedings of the international conference on social modeling and simulation, plus econ- ophysics colloquium 2014. Takayasu H, Ito N, Noda I, Takayasu M, editors. Cham: Springer Pro- ceedings in Complexity; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20591-5 118. Kontou E, Murray-Tuite P, Wernstedt K. Duration of commute travel changes in the aftermath of Hurri- cane Sandy using accelerated failure time modeling. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2017; 100: 170– 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.015 119. Zhong RX, Xie XX, Luo JC, Pan TL, Lam WHK, Sumalee A. Modeling double time-scale travel time processes with application to assessing the resilience of transportation systems. Transport Res Part B Meth. 2020; 132: 228–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.05.005 120. Donovan B, Work DB. Empirically quantifying city-scale transportation system resilience to extreme events. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2017; 79: 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.03. 002 121. Zhu Y, Ozbay K, Xie K, Yang H. Using big data to study resilience of taxi and subway trips for hurri- canes Sandy and Irene. Transp Res Rec. 2016; 2599: 70–80. https://doi.org/10.3141/2599-09 122. Nateghi R. Multi-dimensional infrastructure resilience modeling: An application to hurricane-prone electric power distribution systems. IEEE Access. 2018; 6: 13478–13489. https://doi.org/10.1109/

Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 22 / 26

130. Lin N, Kopp RE, Horton BP, Donnelly JP. Hurricane Sandy’s flood frequency increasing from year 1800 to 2100. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: 12071–12075. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1604386113 PMID: 27790992 131. Ullman DS, Ginis I, Huang W, Nowakowski C, Chen X, Stempel P. Assessing the multiple impacts of extreme hurricanes in southern New England, USA. Geosciences. 2019; 9: 265. https://doi.org/10. 3390/geosciences9060265 132. Suh S-W, Kim H-J. Simulation of wave overtopping and inundation over a dike caused by Typhoon Chaba at Marine City, Busan, Korea. J Coast Res. 2018; 85: 711–715. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI85- 143.1 133. Guimarães PV, Farina L, Toldo EE Jr. Analysis of extreme wave events on the southern coast of Bra- zil. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2014; 14: 3195–3205. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-3195-2014 134. Zhong H, van Overloop P-J, van Gelder PHAJM. A joint probability approach using a 1-D hydrody- namic model for estimating high water level frequencies in the Lower Rhine Delta. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2013; 13: 1841–1852. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-1841-2013 135. Ke Q, Jonkman S, van Gelder P, Bricker J. Frequency analysis of storm-surge-induced flooding for the Huangpu River in Shanghai, China. J Mar Sci Eng. 2018; 6: 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jmse6020070 136. Orton P, Georgas N, Blumberg A, Pullen J. Detailed modeling of recent severe storm tides in estuaries of the New York City region: storm tides in New York City Estuaries. J Geophys Res. 2012; 117: C09030. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008220

137. Orton P, Talke S, Jay D, Yin L, Blumberg A, Georgas N, et al. Channel shallowing as mitigation of coastal flooding. J Mar Sci Eng. 2015; 3: 654–673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse3030654 138. Mercer A, Dyer J. A new scheme for daily peak wind gust prediction using machine learning. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014; 36: 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.059 139. Loftis JD, Forrest D, Katragadda S, Spencer K, Organski T, Nguyen C, et al. StormSense: A new inte- grated network of IoT water level sensors in the smart cities of Hampton Roads, VA. Mar Technol Soc J. 2018; 52: 56–67. https://doi.org/10.4031/MTSJ.52.2.7 PMID: 31092957 140. Kh. Zamim S, Saad Faraj N, A. Aidan I, M. S. Al-Zwainy F, A. AbdulQader M, A. Mohammed I. Predic- tion of dust storms in construction projects using intelligent artificial neural network technology. PEN. 2019; 7: 1659. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i4.857 141. Hoffmann P, Merker C, Lengfeld K, Ament F. The Hamburg Tornado (7 June 2016) from the perspec- tive of low-cost high-resolution radar data and weather forecast model. Atmos Res. 2018; 211: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.04.009 142. Chandrasekar V, Chen H, Philips B. Principles of high-resolution radar network for hazard mitigation and disaster management in an urban environment. J Meteorol Soc Japan. 2018; 96A: 119–139. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2018-015 143. Carrasco S, Ochiai C, Okazaki K. A study on housing modifications in resettlement sites in Cagayan

de Oro, Philippines. J Asian Archit Build Eng. 2016; 15: 25–32. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.15.25 144. Kammerbauer Mark. Asymmetrical recovery in cities after disaster: The lower Ninth Ward in New Orle- ans after Hurricane Katrina. Raumforsch Raumordn. 2014; 72: 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13147-014-0309-4 145. Herna´ ndez D, Chang D, Hutchinson C, Hill E, Almonte A, Burns R, et al. Public housing on the periph- ery: Vulnerable residents and depleted resilience reserves post-Hurricane Sandy. J Urban Health. 2018; 95: 703–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-018-0280-4 PMID: 30088128 146. Carrasco S, Ochiai C, Okazaki K. Disaster induced resettlement: Multi-stakeholder interactions and decision making following tropical storm Washi in Cagayan de Oro, Philippines. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016; 218: 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.04.008 147. Gamboa FB. Flooded, resettlements and forgotten: Disaster risk transfer in Motozintla, Chiapas. Revista de Ingenierı´a. 2010; 31: 132–144. 148. McConnell C, Bertolin C. Quantifying environmental impacts of temporary housing at the urban scale: Intersection of vulnerability and post-hurricane relief in New Orleans. Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2019; 10: 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-019-00244-y 149. White SS. Out of the rubble and towards a sustainable future: The “greening” of Greensburg, Kansas. Sustainability. 2010; 2: 2302–2319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2072302 150. Dominoni A, Quaquaro B, Fairburn S. Space4Inspiration: Survival Lab. Designing countermeasures

for natural disasters. Des J. 2017; 20: S1927–S1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017. 1352710 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 23 / 26

151. Sˇ akić Trogrlić R, Rijke J, Dolman N, Zevenbergen C. Rebuild by design in Hoboken: A design competi- tion as a means for achieving flood resilience of urban areas through the implementation of green infra- structure. Water. 2018; 10: 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050553 152. Lochhead H. Resilience by design: Can innovative processes deliver more? Procedia Eng. 2017; 180: 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.160 153. Hoeferlin DJ. The Franz Building: A strong advocation for adaptive re-use in post-Katrina New Orle- ans. J Green Build. 2009; 4: 23–40. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.4.1.23 154. Rohland E. Adapting to hurricanes. A historical perspective on New Orleans from its foundation to Hur- ricane Katrina, 1718–2005: Adapting to hurricanes. WIREs Clim Change. 2018; 9: e488. https://doi. org/10.1002/wcc.488 155. Scoppetta Cecilia. “Natural” disasters as (neo-liberal) opportunity? Discussing post-hurricane Katrina urban regeneration in New Orleans. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment. 2016; 9: 25–41. https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/3725 156. Kates RW, Colten CE, Laska S, Leatherman SP. Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. PNAS. 2006; 103: 14653–14660. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0605726103 PMID: 17003119 157. Baade RA, Matheson VA. Professional sports, Hurricane Katrina, and the economic redevelopment of New Orleans. Contemp Econ Policy. 2007; 25: 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007. 00075.x

158. Xiao Y, Wu K, Finn D, Chandrasekhar D. Community businesses as social units in post-disaster recov- ery. J Plan Educ Res. 2018; 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18804328 159. Cambaza E, Mongo E, Anapakala E, Nhambire R, Singo J, Machava E. Outbreak of cholera due to Cyclone Kenneth in northern Mozambique, 2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16: 2925. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162925 PMID: 31443180 160. Raza T C. Rentoy F, Ahmed N, Thess Khas S. Raza AVLA, E. Marasigan KM, M. Espinosa RI. Water challenges and urban sustainable development in changing climate: economic growth agenda for global south. Eur J Sustain Dev. 2019; 8: 421. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n4p421 161. Sim T, Wang D, Han Z. Assessing the disaster resilience of megacities: The case of Hong Kong. Sus- tainability. 2018; 10: 1137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041137 162. Aguilar-Barajas I, Sisto NP, Ramirez AI, Magaña-Rueda V. Building urban resilience and knowledge co-production in the face of weather hazards: Flash floods in the Monterrey Metropolitan Area (Mexico). Environ Sci Policy. 2019; 99: 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.021 163. Vega JL, Dı´az D. Developing sustainable planning for heritage conservation in the tropics: A GIS- based risk and vulnerability assessment profile for historic archives in Puerto Rico. WIT Trans Ecol Environ. 2018; 217: 613–623. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP180521 164. Safruddim Imran AM, Busthan Pachri. Flood and landslide vulnerability as natural hazard in Parepare

City. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2019; 235: 012079. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/235/1/ 012079 165. Hays WW. Hazard and Risk Assessments in the United States. Episodes. 1991; 14: 7–12. https://doi. org/10.18814/epiiugs/1991/v14i1/003 166. Santos-Burgoa C, Sandberg J, Sua´ rez E, Goldman-Hawes A, Zeger S, Garcia-Meza A, et al. Differen- tial and persistent risk of excess mortality from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico: A time-series analysis. Lancet Planet Health. 2018; 2: e478–e488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30209-2 PMID: 30318387 167. Howland RE, Li W, Madsen AM, Wong H, Das T, Betancourt FM, et al. Evaluating the use of an elec- tronic death registration system for mortality surveillance during and after Hurricane Sandy: New York City, 2012. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105: e55–e62. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302784 PMID: 26378834 168. Eisenman DP, Cordasco KM, Asch S, Golden JF, Glik D. Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: S109– S115. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.084335 PMID: 17413069 169. Solecki W, Leichenko R, Eisenhauer D. Extreme climate events, household decision-making and tran- sitions in the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Misc Geogr. 2017; 21: 139–150. https://doi. org/10.1515/mgrsd-2017-0029 170. Huang X, Wang C, Lu J. Understanding the spatiotemporal development of human settlement in hurri- cane-prone areas on the US Atlantic and Gulf coasts using nighttime remote sensing. Nat Hazards

Earth Syst Sci. 2019; 19: 2141–2155. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-2141-2019 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 24 / 26

171. Wang Q, Taylor JE. Patterns and limitations of urban human mobility resilience under the influence of multiple types of natural disaster. Braunstein LA, editor. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11: e0147299. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147299 PMID: 26820404 172. Snyder B, Napawan NC. Porosity: Networking cities for a changing climate. Architecture_MPS. 2014; 6: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.amps.2014v6i1.001 173. Wang Q, Taylor JE. Quantifying human mobility perturbation and resilience in Hurricane Sandy. Wu Y, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e112608. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112608 PMID: 25409009 174. Wang Q, Taylor JE. Resilience of human mobility under the influence of typhoons. Procedia Eng. 2015; 118: 942–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.535 175. Kryvasheyeu Y, Chen H, Obradovich N, Moro E, Van Hentenryck P, Fowler J, et al. Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Sci Adv. 2016; 2: e1500779. https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.1500779 PMID: 27034978 176. Fussell E. The long-term recovery of New Orleans’ population after Hurricane Katrina. Am Behav Sci. 2015; 59: 1231–1245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215591181 PMID: 26880853 177. Meduri Y. Multi-stakeholder participation in disaster recovery: A case study. Procedia Eng. 2016; 159: 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.153 178. Yabe T, Ukkusuri SV, C. Rao PS. Mobile phone data reveals the importance of pre-disaster inter-city social ties for recovery after Hurricane Maria. Appl Netw Sci. 2019; 4: 98. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s41109-019-0221-5

179. Dunlap E, Graves J, Benoit E. Stages of drug market change during disaster: Hurricane Katrina and reformulation of the New Orleans drug market. Int J Drug Policy. 2012; 23: 473–480. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.04.003 PMID: 22728093 180. Gamble JL, Hurley BJ, Schultz PA, Jaglom WS, Krishnan N, Harris M. Climate change and older Americans: State of the science. Environ Health Perspect. 2013; 121: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1289/ ehp.1205223 PMID: 23033457 181. Dominianni C, Ahmed M, Johnson S, Blum M, Ito K, Lane K. Power outage preparedness and concern among vulnerable New York City residents. J Urban Health. 2018; 95: 716–726. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11524-018-0296-9 PMID: 30051238 182. Bukvic A, Gohlke J, Borate A, Suggs J. Aging in flood-prone coastal areas: Discerning the health and well-being risk for older residents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15: 2900. https://doi.org/10. 3390/ijerph15122900 PMID: 30567352 183. Gonzalez A, Rasul R, Molina L, Schneider S, Bevilacqua K, Bromet EJ, et al. Differential effect of Hur- ricane Sandy exposure on PTSD symptom severity: comparison of community members and respond- ers. Occup Environ Med. 2019; 76: 881–887. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2019-105957 PMID: 31615861 184. Schneider S, Rasul R, Liu B, Corry D, Lieberman-Cribbin W, Watson A, et al. Examining posttraumatic growth and mental health difficulties in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. Psychol Trauma. 2019; 11: 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000400 PMID: 30113188

185. for the Louisiana Healthy Aging Study, Stanko KE, Cherry KE, Ryker KS, Mughal F, Marks LD, et al. Looking for the silver lining: Benefit finding after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in middle-aged, older, and oldest-old Adults. Curr Psychol. 2015; 34: 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9366-2 PMID: 27440961 186. Sirey JA, Berman J, Halkett A, Giunta N, Kerrigan J, Raeifar E, et al. Storm impact and depression among older adults living in Hurricane Sandy–affected areas. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017; 11: 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2016.189 PMID: 27995840 187. West JS, Price M, Gros KS, Ruggiero KJ. Community support as a moderator of postdisaster mental health symptoms in urban and nonurban communities. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013; 7: 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2013.74 PMID: 24274123 188. Gruebner O, Lowe SR, Tracy M, Joshi S, Cerda´ M, Norris FH, et al. Mapping concentrations of post- traumatic stress and depression trajectories following Hurricane Ike. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 32242. https:// doi.org/10.1038/srep32242 PMID: 27558011 189. Lee DC, Smith SW, Carr BG, Doran KM, Portelli I, Grudzen CR, et al. Geographic distribution of disas- ter-specific emergency department use after Hurricane Sandy in New York City. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2016; 10: 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2015.190 PMID: 26857616 190. Gruebner O, Lowe SR, Sampson L, Galea S. The geography of post-disaster mental health: spatial patterning of psychological vulnerability and resilience factors in New York City after Hurricane Sandy.

Int J Health Geogr. 2015; 14: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0008-6 PMID: 25889102 191. Lowe SR, Sampson L, Gruebner O, Galea S. Psychological resilience after Hurricane Sandy: The influence of individual- and community-level factors on mental health after a large-scale natural PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 25 / 26

disaster. Chao L, editor. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0125761. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0125761 PMID: 25962178 192. Cepeda A, Saint Onge JM, Kaplan C, Valdez A. The association between disaster-related experiences and mental health outcomes among drug using African American Hurricane Katrina evacuees. Com- munity Ment Health J. 2010; 46: 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9286-4 PMID: 20091228 193. Bonanno GA, Galea S, Bucciarelli A, Vlahov D. What predicts psychological resilience after disaster? The role of demographics, resources, and life stress. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007; 75: 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.671 PMID: 17907849 194. Thornton E, Kennedy S, Hayes-Watson C, Krouse RZ, Mitchell H, Cohn RD, et al. Adapting and imple- menting an evidence-based asthma counseling intervention for resource-poor populations. J Asthma. 2016; 53: 825–834. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2016.1155219 PMID: 27049234 195. Chulada PC, Kennedy S, Mvula MM, Jaffee K, Wildfire J, Thornton E, et al. The head-off environmen- tal asthma in Louisiana (HEAL) study—methods and study population. Environ Health Perspect. 2012; 120: 1592–1599. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104239 PMID: 22895349 196. Toner ES, McGinty M, Schoch-Spana M, Rose DA, Watson M, Echols E, et al. A community checklist for health sector resilience informed by Hurricane Sandy. Health Secur. 2017; 15: 53–69. https://doi. org/10.1089/hs.2016.0079 PMID: 28192055 197. Cohen GH, Tamrakar S, Lowe S, Sampson L, Ettman C, Linas B, et al. Comparison of simulated treat-

ment and cost-effectiveness of a stepped care case-finding intervention vs usual care for posttrau- matic stress disorder after a natural disaster. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017; 74: 1251–1258. https://doi.org/ 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3037 PMID: 28979968 198. Broz D, Levin EC, Mucha AP, Pelzel D, Wong W, Persky VW, et al. Lessons learned from Chicago’s emergency response to mass evacuations caused by Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99: 1496–1504. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126680 PMID: 19197088 199. Chen W, Zhai G, Ren C, Shi Y, Zhang J. Urban resources selection and allocation for emergency shel- ters: In a multi-hazard environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15: 1261. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph15061261 PMID: 29903997 200. Chan E, Man A, Lam H, Chan G, Hall B, Hung K. Is urban household emergency preparedness associ- ated with short-term impact reduction after a super typhoon in subtropical city? Int J Environ Res Pub- lic Health. 2019; 16: 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040596 PMID: 30791356 201. Hongbo W, Ba´rcena A, Kituyi M, Akhtar S, Lopes C, Khalaf R, et al. World Economic Situation and Prospects 2016. New York: United Nations; 2016 pp. 1–231. 202. Shibayama T. 2005 Storm Surge by Hurricane Katrina. In: Esteban M, Takagi H, Shibayama T, edi- tors. Handbook of Coastal Disaster Mitigation for Engineers and Planners. Boston: Butterworth- Heinemann; 2015. pp. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801060-0.00002–2 203. Nel JL, Le Maitre DC, Nel DC, Reyers B, Archibald S, van Wilgen BW, et al. Natural hazards in a

changing world: A case for ecosystem-based management. Magar V, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e95942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095942 PMID: 24806527 204. Du S, Scussolini P, Ward PJ, Zhang M, Wen J, Wang L, et al. Hard or soft flood adaptation? Advan- tages of a hybrid strategy for Shanghai. Glob Environ Change. 2020; 61: 102037. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102037 205. Watts N, Adger WN, Agnolucci P, Blackstock J, Byass P, Cai W, et al. Health and climate change: Pol- icy responses to protect public health. Lancet. 2015; 386: 1861–1914. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(15)60854-6 PMID: 26111439 206. Watts N, Adger WN, Ayeb-Karlsson S, Bai Y, Byass P, Campbell-Lendrum D, et al. The Lancet Count- down: Tracking progress on health and climate change. Lancet. 2017; 389: 1151–1164. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32124-9 PMID: 27856085 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 26 / 26