Thông tin tài nguyên

Wind disasters adaptation in cities in a changing climate: A systematic review

pmc-PMC7968717.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 26 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 21 · Đoạn 56Vị trí nguồn

87. De Lotto R, Gazzola Cecilia Morelli di Popolo V, Maria Venco E. From resilience to flexibility: Urban scenario to reduce hazard. Int J SDP. 2017; 12: 789–799. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N4-789- 799 88. Solecki W, Pelling M, Garschagen M. Transitions between risk management regimes in cities. E&S. 2017; 22: art38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09102-220238 89. Kiddle G, McEvoy D, Mitchell D, Jones P, Mecartney S. Unpacking the pacific urban agenda: Resil- ience challenges and opportunities. Sustainability. 2017; 9: 1878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101878 90. Magee AD, Verdon-Kidd DC, Kiem AS, Royle SA. Tropical cyclone perceptions, impacts and adapta- tion in the Southwest Pacific: An urban perspective from Fiji, Vanuatu and Tonga. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 2016; 16: 1091–1105. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1091-2016 91. Lin N, Shullman E. Dealing with hurricane surge flooding in a changing environment: part I. Risk assessment considering storm climatology change, sea level rise, and coastal development. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2017; 31: 2379–2400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1377-5 92. Tavakkolifard A, Ghasemieh H, Samani AAN, Mashhadi N. Determining the risk of sand transportation to residential areas around Kashan Erg using anemometry data analysis. Desert. 2013; 10: 163–172. 93. Grøntoft T. Observed recent change in climate and potential for decay of Norwegian wood structures. Climate. 2019; 7: 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7020033 94. Baijnath-Rodino JA, Duguay CR. Historical spatiotemporal trends in snowfall extremes over the Cana-

Trang 21 · Đoạn 57Vị trí nguồn

dian domain of the Great Lakes Basin. Adv Meteorol. 2018; 2018: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/ 5404123 95. Borja Baeza RC, Alca´ ntara Ayala I. Mass movement processes and associated risks in Zacapoaxtla, Puebla. Investigaciones Geogra´ ficas. 2012; 7. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.30197 96. Song Y-K, Oh J, Son Y-J, Jung M. Evaluation of landslide susceptibility using scientific investigation and quantitative evaluation. IJDRBC. 2013; 4: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijdrbc.2013.4.01 97. Freeman AC, Ashley WS. Changes in the US hurricane disaster landscape: the relationship between risk and exposure. Nat Hazards. 2017; 88: 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2885-4 98. Klose CD. Evidence for higher tropical storm risks in Haiti due to increasing population density in haz- ard prone urban areas. Environ Res Lett. 2011; 6: 044020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/ 044020 99. Small MJ, Xian S. A human-environmental network model for assessing coastal mitigation decisions informed by imperfect climate studies. Glob Environ Change. 2018; 53: 137–145. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.006 100. Dark SM. The unconscious mind rules in absentia. WIT Trans Ecol Environ. 2016; 204: 599–610. https://doi.org/10.2495/SC160501 101. Fussell E, Sastry N, VanLandingham M. Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Popul Environ. 2010; 31: 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009- 0092-2 PMID: 20440381 102. Reckien D, Petkova EP. Who is responsible for climate change adaptation? Environ Res Lett. 2019;

Trang 21 · Đoạn 58Vị trí nguồn

14: 014010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf07a 103. Juanzon JBP, Oreta AWC. An assessment on the effective preparedness and disaster response: The case of Santa Rosa City, Laguna. Procedia Engineering. 2018; 212: 929–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.proeng.2018.01.120 104. van Ree CCDF, Van MA, Heilemann K, Morris MW, Royet P, Zevenbergen C. FloodProBE: Technolo- gies for improved safety of the built environment in relation to flood events. Environ Sci Policy. 2011; 14: 874–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.03.010 105. Ro¨ zer V, Kreibich H, Schro¨ ter K, Mu¨ ller M, Sairam N, Doss-Gollin J, et al. Probabilistic models signifi- cantly reduce uncertainty in Hurricane Harvey pluvial flood loss estimates. Earth’s Future. 2019; 7: 384–394. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001074 106. Czajkowski J, Villarini G, Montgomery M, Michel-Kerjan E, Goska R. Assessing current and future freshwater flood risk from North Atlantic tropical cyclones via insurance claims. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 41609. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41609 PMID: 28148952 107. Smith JB, Strzepek KM, Cardini J, Castaneda M, Holland J, Quiroz C, et al. Coping with climate vari- ability and climate change in La Ceiba, Honduras. Clim Change. 2011; 108: 457–470. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10584-011-0161-2 108. Lian JJ, Xu K, Ma C. Joint impact of rainfall and tidal level on flood risk in a coastal city with a complex river network: a case study for Fuzhou city, China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. 2012; 9: 7475– 7505. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-9-7475-2012 PLOS ONE Review on wind adaptation in cities

Trang 21 · Đoạn 59Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248503 March 17, 2021 21 / 26