Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting promote positive emotional responses in humans? A stress recovery experiment using 360-degree videos of an urban woodland

Health: A Research Agenda. Environ Health Perspect Online. 2017; 125. https://doi.org/10.1289/ EHP1663 PMID: 28796634 5. Kondo MC, Jacoby SF, South EC. Does spending time outdoors reduce stress? A review of real-time stress response to outdoor environments. Health Place. 2018; 51: 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. healthplace.2018.03.001 PMID: 29604546 6. Markevych I, Schoierer J, Hartig T, Chudnovsky A, Hystad P, Dzhambov AM, et al. Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environ Res. 2017; 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028 PMID: 28672128 7. Yao W, Zhang X, Gong Q. The effect of exposure to the natural environment on stress reduction: A meta-analysis. Urban For Urban Green. 2021; 57: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126932 8. Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol. 1995; 15: 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 9. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol. 1991; 11: 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272- 4944(05)80184-7 10. Kellert SR, Wilson EO. The Biophilia hypothesis. Kellert SR, Wilson EO, editors. Washington, D.C.: Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1993; 1993. 11. Li Q, Kobayashi M, Wakayama Y, Inagaki H, Katsumata M, Hirata Y, et al. Effect of Phytoncide from Trees on Human Natural Killer Cell Function. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2009; 22: 951–959.

https://doi.org/10.1177/039463200902200410 PMID: 20074458 12. Haahtela T. A biodiversity hypothesis. Allergy. 2019; 74: 1445–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13763 PMID: 30835837 PLOS ONE Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting, promote positive emotional responses in humans? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297179 February 7, 2024 16 / 20

13. Robinson JM, Cando-Dumancela C, Antwis RE, Cameron R, Liddicoat C, Poudel R, et al. Exposure to airborne bacteria depends upon vertical stratification and vegetation complexity. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 9516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89065-y PMID: 33947905 14. Cracknell D, White MP, Pahl S, Depledge MH. A preliminary investigation into the restorative potential of public aquaria exhibits: a UK student-based study. Landsc Res. 2017; 42: 18–32. https://doi.org/10. 1080/01426397.2016.1243236 15. Wood E, Harsant A, Dallimer M, C de Chavez A, McEachan RRC, Hassall C. Not all green space is cre- ated equal: Biodiversity predicts psychological restorative benefits from urban green space. Front Psy- chol. 2018; 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02320 PMID: 30538653 16. Marselle MR, Hartig T, Cox DTC, De Bell S, Knapp S, Lindley S, et al. Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: A conceptual framework. Environ Int. 2021; 150: 106420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envint.2021.106420 PMID: 33556912 17. Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Fuller RA, editor. Biol Lett. 2007; 3: 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl. 2007.0149 PMID: 17504734 18. Wolf LJ, Zu Ermgassen S, Balmford A, White M, Weinstein N. Is Variety the Spice of Life? An Experi- mental Investigation into the Effects of Species Richness on Self-Reported Mental Well-Being. Wolf LJ, editor. PloS One. 2017; 12: e0170225–e0170225. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170225 PMID: 28107417

19. Cameron RWF, Brindley P, Mears M, McEwan K, Ferguson F, Sheffield D, et al. Where the wild things are! Do urban green spaces with greater avian biodiversity promote more positive emotions in humans? Urban Ecosyst. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00929-z 20. Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Ferrini F, Salbitano F, et al. Go greener, feel bet- ter? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc Urban Plan. 2015; 134: 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10. 022 21. Scopelliti M, Carrus G, Cini F, Mastandrea S, Ferrini F, Lafortezza R, et al. Biodiversity, perceived restorativeness, and benefits of nature: A study on the psychological processes and outcomes of on- site experiences in urban and peri-urban green areas in Italy. In: Kabisch S, Kunath A, Schweizer-Rie P, Steinfu¨ hrer A, editors. Vulnerability, risks, and complexity: Impacts of global change on human habi- tats. Hogrefe Publishing; 2012. pp. 255–269. 22. Lindemann-Matthies P, Matthies D. The influence of plant species richness on stress recovery of humans. Web Ecol. 2018; 18: 121–128. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-18-121-2018 23. Nghiem TPL, Wong KL, Jeevanandam L, Chang C c., Tan LYC, Goh Y, et al. Biodiverse urban forests, happy people: experimental evidence linking perceived biodiversity, restoration, and emotional wellbe- ing. Urban For Urban Green. 2021; 127030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127030

24. Lovell R, Wheeler BW, Higgins SL, Irvine KN, Depledge MH. A Systematic Review of the Health and Well-Being Benefits of Biodiverse Environments. J Toxicol Environ Health—Part B Crit Rev. 2014; 17: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2013.856361 PMID: 24597907 25. Marselle MR, Martens D, Dallimer M, Irvine KN. Review of the Mental Health and Well-being Benefits of Biodiversity. In: Marselle MR, Stadler J, Korn H, Irvine KN, Bonn A, editors. Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 175–211. 26. Botzat A, Fischer LK, Kowarik I. Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cit- ies. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation. Glob Environ Change. 2016; 39: 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.008 27. Hedin M, Hahs AK, Mata L, Lee K. Connecting Biodiversity With Mental Health and Wellbeing—A Review of Methods and Disciplinary Perspectives. Front Ecol Evol. 2022; 10. Available: https://www. frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2022.865727 28. Hussain RI, Walcher R, Eder R, Allex B, Wallner P, Hutter H-P, et al. Management of mountainous meadows associated with biodiversity attributes, perceived health benefits and cultural ecosystem ser- vices. Sci Rep. 2019; 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51571-5 PMID: 31628397 29. Simkin J, Ojala A, Tyrva¨inen L. Restorative effects of mature and young commercial forests, pristine old-growth forest and urban recreation forest—A field experiment. Urban For Urban Green. 2020; 48:

126567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126567 30. Southon GE, Jorgensen A, Dunnett N, Hoyle H, Evans KL. Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and well-being impacts. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018; 172: 1–10. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.12.002 31. Schebella MF, Weber D, Schultz L, Weinstein P. The Nature of Reality: Human Stress Recovery during Exposure to Biodiverse, Multisensory Virtual Environments. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010056 PMID: 31861700 PLOS ONE Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting, promote positive emotional responses in humans? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297179 February 7, 2024 17 / 20

space in a neotropical city. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 755: 143095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2020.143095 PMID: 33139002 39. Lindemann-Matthies P, Bose E. How Many Species Are There? Public Understanding and Awareness of Biodiversity in Switzerland. Hum Ecol. 2008; 36: 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9194- 1 40. Shwartz A, Turbe´ A, Simon L, Julliard R. Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: An experiment. Biol Conserv. 2014; 171: 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.009 41. Gyllin M, Grahn P. A semantic model for assessing the experience of urban biodiversity. Urban For Urban Green. 2005; 3: 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2005.04.004 42. Berto R. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. J Environ Psychol. 2005; 25: 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001 43. Johansson M, Gyllin M, Witzell J, Ku¨ller M. Does biological quality matter? Direct and reflected appraisal of biodiversity in temperate deciduous broad-leaf forest. Urban For Urban Green. 2014; 13: 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.009 44. Van Den Berg AE, Jorgensen A, Wilson ER. Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landsc Urban Plan. 2014; 127: 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2014.04.012 45. Wang X, Rodiek S, Wu C, Chen Y, Li Y. Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban For Urban Green. 2016; 15: 112–122. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003

46. Wilkie S, Clouston L. Environment preference and environment type congruence: Effects on perceived restoration potential and restoration outcomes. Urban For Urban Green. 2015; 14: 368–376. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.03.002 47. Browning M, Mimnaugh KJ, van Riper CJ, Laurent HK, LaValle SM. Can Simulated Nature Support Mental Health? Comparing Short, Single-Doses of 360-Degree Nature Videos in Virtual Reality With the Outdoors. Front Psychol. 2020; 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02667 PMID: 32010003 48. Sneed JC, Deringer SA, Hanley A. Nature Connection and 360-Degree Video: An Exploratory Study With Immersive Technology. J Exp Educ. 2021; 10538259211001568. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 10538259211001568 49. Wagler A, Hanus MD. Comparing Virtual Reality Tourism to Real-Life Experience: Effects of Presence and Engagement on Attitude and Enjoyment. Commun Res Rep. 2018; 35: 456–464. https://doi.org/10. 1080/08824096.2018.1525350 50. Chirico A, Gaggioli A. When Virtual Feels Real: Comparing Emotional Responses and Presence in Vir- tual and Natural Environments. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw. 2019; 22: 220–226. https://doi.org/ 10.1089/cyber.2018.0393 PMID: 30730222 51. Browning M, Shipley N, McAnirlin O, Becker D, Yu C-P, Hartig T, et al. An Actual Natural Setting Improves Mood Better Than Its Virtual Counterpart: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Data. Front Psy- chol. 2020; 11: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02200 PMID: 33101104 52. Mcmahan EA, Estes D. The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative

affect: A meta-analysis. J Posit Psychol. 2015; 10: 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014. 994224 PLOS ONE Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting, promote positive emotional responses in humans? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297179 February 7, 2024 18 / 20

53. Kjellgren A, Buhrkall H. A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. J Environ Psychol. 2010; 30: 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp. 2010.01.011 54. Thompson ER. Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2007; 38: 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0022022106297301 55. Gross JJ, Uusberg H, Uusberg A. Mental illness and well-being: an affect regulation perspective. World Psychiatry. 2019; 18: 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20618 PMID: 31059626 56. Richardson M, McEwan K, Maratos F, Sheffield D. Joy and Calm: How an Evolutionary Functional Model of Affect Regulation Informs Positive Emotions in Nature. Evol Psychol Sci. 2016; 2: 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0065-5 57. McManus MD, Siegel JT, Nakamura J. The predictive power of low-arousal positive affect. Motiv Emot. 2019; 43: 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9719-x 58. Brown G, Reed P. Validation of a Forest Values Typology for Use in National Forest Planning. For Sci. 2000; 46: 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/46.2.240 59. van Riper CJ, Kyle GT, Sherrouse BC, Bagstad KJ, Sutton SG. Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park. Ecol Indic. 2017; 72: 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.029 60. Schultz PW. Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. Psychology of sustain-

able development. Springer; 2002. pp. 61–78. 61. Mayer FS, Frantz CM. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in com- munity with nature. J Environ Psychol. 2004; 24: 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10. 001 62. Capaldi CA, Passmore H-A, Ishii R, Chistopolskaya KA, Vowinckel J, Nikolaev EL, et al. Engaging with natural beauty may be related to well-being because it connects people to nature: Evidence from three cultures. Ecopsychology. 2017; 9: 199–211. 63. Huynh H, Feldt LS. Estimation of the Box Correction for Degrees of Freedom from Sample Data in Ran- domized Block and Split-Plot Designs. J Educ Stat. 1976; 1: 69–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164736 64. Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, California; 2017. 65. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175–191. https://doi. org/10.3758/bf03193146 PMID: 17695343 66. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. 1988. 67. Mostajeran F, Krzikawski J, Steinicke F, Ku¨hn S. Effects of exposure to immersive videos and photo sli- deshows of forest and urban environments. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 021-83277-y PMID: 33597577 68. Zabini F, Albanese L, Becheri FR, Gavazzi G, Giganti F, Giovanelli F, et al. Comparative Study of the Restorative Effects of Forest and Urban Videos during COVID-19 Lockdown: Intrinsic and Benchmark

Values. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218011 PMID: 33143327 69. Tyrvainen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, Lanki T, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T. The influence of urban green envi- ronments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. J Environ Psychol. 2014; 38: 1–9. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005 70. Cracknell D, White MP, Pahl S, Nichols WJ, Depledge MH. Marine biota and psychological well-being: a preliminary examination of dose–response effects in an aquarium setting. Environ Behav. 2016; 48: 1242–1269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515597512 PMID: 27818525 71. Cox DTC, Shanahan DF, Hudson HL, Plummer KE, Siriwardena GM, Fuller RA, et al. Doses of neigh- borhood nature: The benefits for mental health of living with nature. BioScience. 2017; 67: 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw173 72. Passmore H-A, Holder MD. Noticing nature: Individual and social benefits of a two-week intervention. J Posit Psychol. 2017; 12: 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1221126 73. Passmore H-A, Yargeau A, Blench J. Wellbeing in Winter: Testing the Noticing Nature Intervention Dur- ing Winter Months. Front Psychol. 2022; 13. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.840273 PMID: 35548509 74. Passmore H-A, Yang Y, Sabine S. An Extended Replication Study of the Well-Being Intervention, the Noticing Nature Intervention (NNI). J Happiness Stud. 2022; 23: 2663–2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10902-022-00516-3 PLOS ONE

Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting, promote positive emotional responses in humans? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297179 February 7, 2024 19 / 20

75. McEwan K, Giles D, Clarke FJ, Kotera Y, Evans G, Terebenina O, et al. A pragmatic controlled trial of forest bathing compared with compassionate mind training in the UK: Impacts on self-reported wellbe- ing and heart rate variability. Sustain Switz. 2021; 13: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031380 76. Elsadek M, Liu B. Effects of viewing flowering plants on employees’ wellbeing in an office-like environ- ment. Indoor Built Environ. 2020; 1420326X20942572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X20942572 77. Neale C, Griffiths A, Chalmin-Pui LS, Mendu S, Boukhechba M, Roe J. Color aesthetics: A transatlantic comparison of psychological and physiological impacts of warm and cool colors in garden landscapes. Wellbeing Space Soc. 2021; 2: 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2021.100038 78. Zhang L, Dempsey N, Cameron R. Flowers–Sunshine for the soul! How does floral colour influence preference, feelings of relaxation and positive up-lift? Urban For Urban Green. 2023; 79: 127795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127795 79. Hoyle H, Hitchmough J, Jorgensen A. All about the ‘wow factor’? The relationships between aesthetics, restorative effect and perceived biodiversity in designed urban planting. Landsc Urban Plan. 2017; 164: 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.03.011 PLOS ONE Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting, promote positive emotional responses in humans? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297179 February 7, 2024 20 / 20