Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting promote positive emotional responses in humans? A stress recovery experiment using 360-degree videos of an urban woodland

53. Kjellgren A, Buhrkall H. A comparison of the restorative effect of a natural environment with that of a simulated natural environment. J Environ Psychol. 2010; 30: 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp. 2010.01.011 54. Thompson ER. Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2007; 38: 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0022022106297301 55. Gross JJ, Uusberg H, Uusberg A. Mental illness and well-being: an affect regulation perspective. World Psychiatry. 2019; 18: 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20618 PMID: 31059626 56. Richardson M, McEwan K, Maratos F, Sheffield D. Joy and Calm: How an Evolutionary Functional Model of Affect Regulation Informs Positive Emotions in Nature. Evol Psychol Sci. 2016; 2: 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0065-5 57. McManus MD, Siegel JT, Nakamura J. The predictive power of low-arousal positive affect. Motiv Emot. 2019; 43: 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9719-x 58. Brown G, Reed P. Validation of a Forest Values Typology for Use in National Forest Planning. For Sci. 2000; 46: 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/46.2.240 59. van Riper CJ, Kyle GT, Sherrouse BC, Bagstad KJ, Sutton SG. Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park. Ecol Indic. 2017; 72: 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.029 60. Schultz PW. Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. Psychology of sustain-

able development. Springer; 2002. pp. 61–78. 61. Mayer FS, Frantz CM. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in com- munity with nature. J Environ Psychol. 2004; 24: 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10. 001 62. Capaldi CA, Passmore H-A, Ishii R, Chistopolskaya KA, Vowinckel J, Nikolaev EL, et al. Engaging with natural beauty may be related to well-being because it connects people to nature: Evidence from three cultures. Ecopsychology. 2017; 9: 199–211. 63. Huynh H, Feldt LS. Estimation of the Box Correction for Degrees of Freedom from Sample Data in Ran- domized Block and Split-Plot Designs. J Educ Stat. 1976; 1: 69–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164736 64. Neuendorf KA. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, California; 2017. 65. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39: 175–191. https://doi. org/10.3758/bf03193146 PMID: 17695343 66. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. 1988. 67. Mostajeran F, Krzikawski J, Steinicke F, Ku¨hn S. Effects of exposure to immersive videos and photo sli- deshows of forest and urban environments. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 021-83277-y PMID: 33597577 68. Zabini F, Albanese L, Becheri FR, Gavazzi G, Giganti F, Giovanelli F, et al. Comparative Study of the Restorative Effects of Forest and Urban Videos during COVID-19 Lockdown: Intrinsic and Benchmark

Values. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218011 PMID: 33143327 69. Tyrvainen L, Ojala A, Korpela K, Lanki T, Tsunetsugu Y, Kagawa T. The influence of urban green envi- ronments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. J Environ Psychol. 2014; 38: 1–9. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005 70. Cracknell D, White MP, Pahl S, Nichols WJ, Depledge MH. Marine biota and psychological well-being: a preliminary examination of dose–response effects in an aquarium setting. Environ Behav. 2016; 48: 1242–1269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515597512 PMID: 27818525 71. Cox DTC, Shanahan DF, Hudson HL, Plummer KE, Siriwardena GM, Fuller RA, et al. Doses of neigh- borhood nature: The benefits for mental health of living with nature. BioScience. 2017; 67: 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw173 72. Passmore H-A, Holder MD. Noticing nature: Individual and social benefits of a two-week intervention. J Posit Psychol. 2017; 12: 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1221126 73. Passmore H-A, Yargeau A, Blench J. Wellbeing in Winter: Testing the Noticing Nature Intervention Dur- ing Winter Months. Front Psychol. 2022; 13. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ fpsyg.2022.840273 PMID: 35548509 74. Passmore H-A, Yang Y, Sabine S. An Extended Replication Study of the Well-Being Intervention, the Noticing Nature Intervention (NNI). J Happiness Stud. 2022; 23: 2663–2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10902-022-00516-3 PLOS ONE

Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting, promote positive emotional responses in humans? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297179 February 7, 2024 19 / 20