Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting promote positive emotional responses in humans? A stress recovery experiment using 360-degree videos of an urban woodland

32. Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AMJJ, Davies ZG, Rouquette JR, Maltby LL, et al. Biodiversity and the Feel-Good Factor: Understanding Associations between Self-Reported Human Well-being and Species Richness. BioScience. 2012; 62: 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9 33. Gonc¸alves P, Grilo F, Mendes RC, Vierikko K, Elands B, Marques TA, et al. What’s biodiversity got to do with it? Perceptions of biodiversity and restorativeness in urban parks. Ecol Soc. 2021; 26. https:// doi.org/10.5751/ES-12598-260325 34. Hoyle H, Norton B, Dunnett N, Richards JP, Russell JM, Warren P. Plant species or flower colour diver- sity? Identifying the drivers of public and invertebrate response to designed annual meadows. Landsc Urban Plan. 2018; 180: 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.017 35. Benfield JA, Taff BD, Newman P, Smyth J. Natural sound facilitates mood recovery. Ecopsychology. 2014; 6: 183–188. 36. Hedblom M, Gunnarsson B, Iravani B, Knez I, Schaefer M, Thorsson P, et al. Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1–11. https://doi. org/10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7 PMID: 31300656 37. Austen GE, Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Maund PR, Fish RD, Davies ZG. Exploring shared public perspec- tives on biodiversity attributes. People Nat. 2021; 3: 901–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10237 38. Fisher JC, Irvine KN, Bicknell JE, Hayes WM, Fernandes D, Mistry J, et al. Perceived biodiversity, sound, naturalness and safety enhance the restorative quality and wellbeing benefits of green and blue

space in a neotropical city. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 755: 143095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2020.143095 PMID: 33139002 39. Lindemann-Matthies P, Bose E. How Many Species Are There? Public Understanding and Awareness of Biodiversity in Switzerland. Hum Ecol. 2008; 36: 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-008-9194- 1 40. Shwartz A, Turbe´ A, Simon L, Julliard R. Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: An experiment. Biol Conserv. 2014; 171: 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.009 41. Gyllin M, Grahn P. A semantic model for assessing the experience of urban biodiversity. Urban For Urban Green. 2005; 3: 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2005.04.004 42. Berto R. Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. J Environ Psychol. 2005; 25: 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001 43. Johansson M, Gyllin M, Witzell J, Ku¨ller M. Does biological quality matter? Direct and reflected appraisal of biodiversity in temperate deciduous broad-leaf forest. Urban For Urban Green. 2014; 13: 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.009 44. Van Den Berg AE, Jorgensen A, Wilson ER. Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landsc Urban Plan. 2014; 127: 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landurbplan.2014.04.012 45. Wang X, Rodiek S, Wu C, Chen Y, Li Y. Stress recovery and restorative effects of viewing different urban park scenes in Shanghai, China. Urban For Urban Green. 2016; 15: 112–122. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ufug.2015.12.003

46. Wilkie S, Clouston L. Environment preference and environment type congruence: Effects on perceived restoration potential and restoration outcomes. Urban For Urban Green. 2015; 14: 368–376. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.03.002 47. Browning M, Mimnaugh KJ, van Riper CJ, Laurent HK, LaValle SM. Can Simulated Nature Support Mental Health? Comparing Short, Single-Doses of 360-Degree Nature Videos in Virtual Reality With the Outdoors. Front Psychol. 2020; 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02667 PMID: 32010003 48. Sneed JC, Deringer SA, Hanley A. Nature Connection and 360-Degree Video: An Exploratory Study With Immersive Technology. J Exp Educ. 2021; 10538259211001568. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 10538259211001568 49. Wagler A, Hanus MD. Comparing Virtual Reality Tourism to Real-Life Experience: Effects of Presence and Engagement on Attitude and Enjoyment. Commun Res Rep. 2018; 35: 456–464. https://doi.org/10. 1080/08824096.2018.1525350 50. Chirico A, Gaggioli A. When Virtual Feels Real: Comparing Emotional Responses and Presence in Vir- tual and Natural Environments. Cyberpsychology Behav Soc Netw. 2019; 22: 220–226. https://doi.org/ 10.1089/cyber.2018.0393 PMID: 30730222 51. Browning M, Shipley N, McAnirlin O, Becker D, Yu C-P, Hartig T, et al. An Actual Natural Setting Improves Mood Better Than Its Virtual Counterpart: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Data. Front Psy- chol. 2020; 11: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02200 PMID: 33101104 52. Mcmahan EA, Estes D. The effect of contact with natural environments on positive and negative

affect: A meta-analysis. J Posit Psychol. 2015; 10: 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014. 994224 PLOS ONE Does increasing biodiversity in an urban woodland setting, promote positive emotional responses in humans? PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297179 February 7, 2024 18 / 20