Thông tin tài nguyên

Biodiversity hotspot assessment in the Altai Mountains transboundary region based on Mammals and Aves

pmc-PMC11616857.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 20 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 19 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

28. Ye X, Yu X, Yu C, Tayibazhaer A, Xu F, Skidmore AK, et al. Impacts of future climate and land cover changes on threatened mammals in the semi-arid Chinese Altai Mountains. Science of the total environ- ment. 2018; 612: 775–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.191 PMID: 28866405 29. Cazzolla Gatti R, Callaghan T, Velichevskaya A, Dudko A, Fabbio L, Battipaglia G, et al. Accelerating upward treeline shift in the Altai Mountains under last-century climate change. Scientific reports. 2019; 9: 7678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44188-1 PMID: 31118471 30. Zolotov DV, Chernykh DV, Biryukov RYu, Pershin DK, Malygina NS, Gribkov AV. Change of Land Use in Altai Krai: Problems and Prospects for the Achievement of Land Degradation Neutrality. Arid Ecosyst. 2020; 10: 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096120020134 31. An L, Shen L, Zhong S, Li D. Transboundary ecological network identification for addressing conserva- tion priorities and landscape ecological risks: Insights from the Altai Mountains. Ecological Indicators. 2023; 156: 111159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111159 32. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distribu- tions. Ecological modelling. 2006; 190: 231–259. 33. He P, Li J, Li Y, Xu N, Gao Y, Guo L, et al. Habitat protection and planning for three Ephedra using the MaxEnt and Marxan models. Ecological Indicators. 2021; 133: 108399. 34. Liu D, Yang J, Chen S, Sun W. Potential distribution of threatened maples in China under climate

Trang 19 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

change: Implications for conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2022; 40: e02337. 35. Shen W, Li Y, Qin Y. Research on the influencing factors and multi-scale regulatory pathway of ecosys- tem health: A case study in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River, China. Journal of Cleaner Produc- tion. 2023; 406: 137038. 36. Dai G, Wang S, Geng Y, Dawazhaxi, Ou X, Zhang Z. Potential risks of TITHONIA DIVERSIFOLIA in Yunnan Province under climate change. Ecological Research. 2021; 36: 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1440-1703.12182 37. Helmstetter NA, Conway CJ, Stevens BS, Goldberg AR. Balancing transferability and complexity of species distribution models for rare species conservation. Fourcade Y, editor. Diversity and Distribu- tions. 2021; 27: 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13174 38. Pearson RG, Stanton JC, Shoemaker KT, Aiello-Lammens ME, Ersts PJ, Horning N, et al. Life history and spatial traits predict extinction risk due to climate change. Nature Clim Change. 2014; 4: 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2113 39. Shafer CL. National park and reserve planning to protect biological diversity: some basic elements. Landscape and Urban Planning. 1999; 44: 123–153. 40. Zhang L, Li J. Identifying priority areas for biodiversity conservation based on Marxan and InVEST model. Landsc Ecol. 2022; 37: 3043–3058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01547-0 41. Gonza´ lez LM, Arroyo BE, Margalida A, Sa´nchez R, Oria J. Effect of human activities on the behaviour of breeding Spanish imperial eagles (Aquila adalberti): management implications for the conservation

Trang 19 · Đoạn 48Vị trí nguồn

of a threatened species. Animal Conservation. 2006; 9: 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795. 2005.00016.x 42. Li X, Hu W, Bleisch WV, Li Q, Wang H, Ti B, et al. Disproportionate loss of threatened terrestrial mam- mals along anthropogenic disturbance gradients. Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 850: 158038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158038 PMID: 35981589 43. Jung M, Dahal PR, Butchart SH, Donald PF, De Lamo X, Lesiv M, et al. A global map of terrestrial habi- tat types. Scientific data. 2020; 7: 256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00599-8 PMID: 32759943 44. Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature. 2001; 414: 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/ 35102054 PMID: 11689943 45. Yang H, Viña A, Tang Y, Zhang J, Wang F, Zhao Z, et al. Range-wide evaluation of wildlife habitat change: A demonstration using Giant Pandas. Biological Conservation. 2017; 213: 203–209. 46. Forister ML, McCall AC, Sanders NJ, Fordyce JA, Thorne JH, O’Brien J, et al. Compounded effects of climate change and habitat alteration shift patterns of butterfly diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 2088–2092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909686107 PMID: 20133854 47. Frishkoff LO, Karp DS, Flanders JR, Zook J, Hadly EA, Daily GC, et al. Climate change and habitat con- version favour the same species. Haddad N, editor. Ecology Letters. 2016; 19: 1081–1090. https://doi. org/10.1111/ele.12645 PMID: 27396714

Trang 19 · Đoạn 49Vị trí nguồn

48. CBD S. The strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: Nagoya, Japan. 2010. 49. CBD S. Global Biodiversity Outlook 5| Convention on Biological Diversity. 2020. PLOS ONE Biodiversity hotspot assessment in the Altai Mountains transboundary region PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314075 December 4, 2024 19 / 20