Trumpism, climate and COVID: Social bases of the new science rejection

13. McCright A.M. & Dunlap R.E. 2011. “The politicization of climate change and polarization in the Ameri- can public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010.” Sociological Quarterly 52(2):155–94. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x 14. Brown A. & Hamilton L.C. 2021. “Interaction effects on support for climate-change mitigation.” Social Science Quarterly 102:2649–2660. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13087 PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 15 / 20

15. Stoutenborough J.W., Bromley-Trujillo R. & Vedlitz A. 2014. “Public support for climate change policy: Consistency in the influence of values and attitudes over time and across specific policy alternatives.” Review of Policy Research 31(6):555–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ROPR.12104 16. Gadarian S.K., Goodman S.W., & Pepinsky T.B. 2021. “Partisanship, health behavior, and policy atti- tudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.” PloS One 16(4):e0249596. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0249596 PMID: 33826646 17. Gratz K.L., Richmond J.R., Woods S.E., Dixon-Gordon K.L., Scamaldo K.M., Rose J.P. & Tull M.T. 2021.“Adherence to social distancing guidelines throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of pseudoscientific beliefs, trust, political party affiliation, and risk perceptions.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine 55(5):399–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab024 PMID: 33830215 18. Hamilton L.C. & Safford T.G. 2021. “Elite cues and the rapid decline of trust in scientists on COVID- 19.” Sociological Perspectives 102:2482–2498. https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214211022391 19. Shao W. & Hao F. 2021. “Understanding American public support for COVID-19 risk mitigation: The role of political orientation, socio-demographic characteristics, personal concern, and experience, the United States, 2020.” International Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2021. 1604037 PMID: 34335147 20. Shepherd H., MacKendrick N. & Mora G.C. 2020. “Pandemic politics: Political worldviews and COVID-

19 beliefs and practices in an unsettled time.” Socius 6:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2378023120972575 21. Sides J., Tausanovitch C. & Vavreck L. 2020. “The politics of covid-19: Partisan polarization about the pandemic has increased, but support for health care reform hasn’t moved at all.” Harvard Data Sci- ence Review, Special Issue 1-COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.611350fd 22. Adolph C., Amano K., Bang-Jensen B., Fullman N. & Wilkerson J. 2021. “Pandemic politics: Timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 46 (2):211–233. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8802162 PMID: 32955556 23. Allcott H., Boxell L., Conway J., Gentzkow M., Thaler M. & Yang D.Y. 2020. “Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the Coronavirus pandemic.” Journal of Public Economics 191:104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254 PMID: 32836504 24. Denworth L. 2022. “People in Republican counties have higher death rates than those in Democratic counties.” Scientific American July 18. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-in- republican-counties-have-higher-death-rates-than-those-in-democratic-counties/ accessed 8/25/ 2022. 25. Grossman G., Kim S., Rexer J. & Thirumurthy H. 2020. “Political partisanship influences behavioral responses to governors’ recommendations for COVID-19 prevention in the United States.” Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(39):24144–24153. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 2007835117 PMID: 32934147

26. Hill T., Gonzalez K. & Davis A. 2020. “The nastiest question: Does population mobility vary by state political ideology during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic?” Sociological Perspectives https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420979700 27. Brulle R.J., Carmichael J. & Jenkins J.C. 2012. “Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empiri- cal assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010.” Climatic Change 114(2):169–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y 28. Fiorina M.P. & Abrams S.J. 2008. “Political polarization in the American public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1):563–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 29. Guber D.L. & Miller W.J. 2013. “A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming.” American Behavioral Scientist 57(1):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0002764212463361 30. McCright A.M., Xiao C. & Dunlap R.E. 2014. “Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974–2012.” Social Science Research 48:251–60. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.008 PMID: 25131288 31. Graham A., Cullen F.T. & Pickett J T. 2020. “Faith in Trump, moral foundations, and social distancing in defiance during the coronavirus pandemic.” Socius 6:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2378023120956815 32. Safford T.G., Whitmore E. & Hamilton L.C. 2021. “Scientists, presidents, and pandemics—Comparing the science-politics nexus during the Zika virus and COVID-19 outbreaks.” Social Science Quarterly

102:2482–2498. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13084 PMID: 34908603 33. Shao W. & Hao F. 2020. “Approval of political leaders can slant evaluation of political issues: Evidence from public concern for climate change in the USA.” Climatic Change 158:201–212. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10584-019-02594-4 PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 16 / 20

34. Hofstadter R. 1964. “The paranoid style in American politics.” Harper’s Magazine November:77–86. Retrieved from https://faculty.washington.edu/jwilker/353/Hofstadter.pdf 35. Del Vicario M., Bessi A., Zollo F., Petroni F., Scala A., Caldarelli G., Stanley H.E. & Quattrociocchi W. 2015. “The spreading of misinformation online.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(3):554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113 36. Van der Linden A., Panagopoulos C., Azevedo F. & Jost J.T. 2020. “The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking.” Political Psychology https://doi. org/10.1111/pops.126810162-895X42(1). 37. Lewandowsky S., Gignac G.E., & Oberauer K. 2013. “The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science.” PLOS One 8(10):e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0075637 PMID: 24098391 38. Lewandowsky S., Cook J. & Lloyd E. 2016. “The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism.” Synthese 195:175–196. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11229-016-1198-6 39. Goldberg Z.J. & Richey S. 2020. “Anti-vaccination beliefs and unrelated conspiracy theories.” World Affairs https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820020920554 40. Cassese E.C., Farhart C.E. & Miller J.M. 2020. “Gender differences in COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs.” Politics & Gender https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000409 41. Hamilton L.C. 2022. “Conspiracy vs. science: A survey of US public beliefs.” Durham, NH: Carsey

effects.” Climatic Change 104:231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8 49. Drummond C. & Fischhoff B. 2017. “Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(36):9587–9592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114 PMID: 28827344 50. Hamilton L.C., Cutler M.J. & Schaefer A. 2012. “Public knowledge and concern about polar-region warming.” Polar Geography 35(2):155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2012.684155 51. Kahan D.M., Peters E., Wittlin M., Slovic P., Ouellette L.L., Braman D. & Mandel G. 2012. “The polariz- ing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks.” Nature Climate Change 2:732–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547 52. Zummo L., Donovan B. & Busch K.C. 2020. “Complex influences of mechanistic knowledge, world- view, and quantitative reasoning on climate change discourse: Evidence for ideologically motivated reasoning among youth.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58:95–127. https://doi.org/10. 1002/tea.21648 53. Hamilton L.C., Hartter J. & Saito K. 2015. “Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines.” SAGE Open https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015602752 54. Hamilton L.C., Wake C.P., Hartter J., Safford T.G. & Puchlopek A. 2016. “Flood realities, perceptions, and the depth of divisions on climate.” Sociology 50:913–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0038038516648547 PMID: 27818533 55. Hamilton L.C., Hartter J., Keim B.D., Boag A.E., Palace M.W., Stevens F.R. & Ducey M.J. 2016. “Wild-

fire, climate, and perceptions in northeast Oregon.” Regional Environmental Change 16:1819–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0914-y PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 17 / 20

56. Hamilton L.C., Lemcke-Stampone M. & Grimm C. 2018. “Cold winters warming? Perceptions of cli- mate change in the North Country.” Weather, Climate, and Society 10(October):641–652. https://doi. org/10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0020.1 57. Hamilton L.C., Bell E., Hartter J. & Salerno J.D. 2018b. “A change in the wind? U.S. public views on renewable energy and climate compared.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 8(11). https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s13705-018-0152-5 58. Hamilton L.C. & Safford T.G. 2015. “Environmental views from the coast: Public concern about local to global marine issues.” Society and Natural Resources 28(1):57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08941920.2014.933926 59. Hamilton L.C., Hartter J., Safford T.G. & Stevens F.R. 2014. “Rural environmental concern: Effects of position, partisanship and place.” Rural Sociology 79(2):257–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12023 60. Berinsky A.J. 2009. In Time of war: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 61. Guber D.L. 2017. “Partisan Cueing and Polarization in Public Opinion about Climate Change.” In, The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.306 62. Zaller J.R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 63. Merkley E. & Stecula D.A. 2018. “Party elites or manufactured doubt? The informational context of cli- mate change polarization.” Science Communication 40(2):258–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1075547018760334

64. Carmichael J.T., Brulle R.J. & Huxster J.K. 2017. “The great divide: Understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014.” Climatic Change 141:599–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1 65. Dunlap R.E. & McCright A.M. 2015. “Challenging climate change: The denial countermovement.” Pp. 300–332 in Dunlap R.E. & Brulle R.J. (eds), Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. 66. Merkley E. & Stecula D. 2020. “Party cues in the news: Democratic elites, Republican backlash, and the dynamics of climate skepticism.” British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0007123420000113 67. Tesler M. 2018. “Elite domination of public doubts about climate change (not evolution).” Political Com- munication 35(2):306–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1380092 68. Green J., Edgerton J., Naftel D., Shoub K., & Cranmer S.J. 2020. “Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic.” Science Advances 6(28):eabc2717. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.306 PMID: 32923600 69. Pink S.L., Chu J., Druckman J., Rand D.G. & Willer R. 2021. “Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans.” PsyArXiv Preprints https://psyarxiv.com/f9jq5 https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.2106559118 PMID: 34312254 70. Corner A., Whitmarsh L. & Xenias D. 2012. “Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate

change: Biased assimilation and attitude polarisation.” Climatic Change 114:463–478. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6 71. Campbell T.H. & Kay A.C. 2014. “Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107(5):809–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0037963 PMID: 25347128 72. Druckman J.N. & McGrath M.C. 2019. “The Evidence for Motivated Reasoning in Climate Change Preference Formation.” Nature Climate Change 9:111–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360- 1 73. Kraft P.W., Lodge M., & Taber C.S. 2015. “Why people ‘don’t trust the evidence’: Motivated reasoning and scientific beliefs.” Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science 658:121–33. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0002716214554758 74. Kunda Z. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3):480–98. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 PMID: 2270237 75. Taber C.S. & Lodge M. 2006. “Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3):755–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x 76. Iyengar S. & Westwood S.J. 2015. “Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59:690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152 77. Pew Research Center. 2016. “Partisanship and political animosity in 2016.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/ accessed 6/29/2022. PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 18 / 20

78. Pew Research Center. 2017. “The partisan divide on political values grows even wider.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political- values-grows-even-wider/ accessed 6/29/2022. 79. Hamilton L.C., Lambert J.E., Lawhon L.A., Salerno J. & Hartter J. 2020. “Wolves are back: Sociopoliti- cal identity and opinions on management of Canis lupus.” Conservation Science and Practice 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.213 80. Hartter J., Hamilton L.C., Ducey M.J., Boag A.E., Salerno J.D., Christoffersen N.D., Oester P.T., Pal- ace M.W. & Stevens F.R. 2020. “Finding common ground: Agreement on increasing wildfire risks crosses political lines.” Environmental Research Letters 15(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ ab7ace 81. Hamilton L.C. 2016. “Where is the North Pole? An election-year survey on global change.” Durham, NH: Carsey School of Public Policy. https://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.274 82. Hamilton L.C. 2018. “Self-assessed understanding of climate change.” Climatic Change 151(2):349– 362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2305-0 83. Economist/YouGov Poll. 2021. “July 10–13–1500 U.S. Adult Citizens.” https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/ w2zmwpzsq0/econTabReport.pdf accessed 7/5/2022 84. Farleigh Dickinson University. 2022. “2020 election conspiracy believers more likely to embrace big- foot, flat Earth.” https://www.fdu.edu/news/fdu-poll-2020-election-conspiracies-more-likely-to- embrace-bigfoot-flat-earth/ accessed 7/5/2022.

85. Jones R.E. & Dunlap R.E. 1992. “The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?” Rural Sociology 57(1):28–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x 86. Xiao C. & McCright A.M. 2007. “Environmental concern and sociodemographic variables: A study of statistical models.” Journal of Environmental Education 38(2):3–14. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38. 1.3-14 87. D’Antonio M. 2022. “DeSantis is trying to out-Trump Trump.” CNN, April 30. https://www.cnn.com/ 2022/04/30/opinions/desantis-trumpism-2-0-dantonio/index.html 88. Lewis M. 2021. “Chris Christie wants to out-Trump Trump.” Daily Beast, June 22. https://www. thedailybeast.com/chris-christie-wants-to-out-trump-trump 89. Azari J. 2022. “How Republicans are thinking about Trumpism without Trump.” FiveThirtyEight, March 15. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-republicans-are-thinking-about-trumpism-without-trump/ 90. Acock A.C. 2013. Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata, revised edition. College Sta- tion, TX: Stata Press. 91. Shoots-Reinhard B., Goodwin R., Bja¨ lkebring P., Markowitz D.M., Silverstein M.C. & Peters E. 2021. “Ability-related political polarization in the COVID-19 pandemic.” Intelligence 88. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.intell.2021.101580 PMID: 34566199 92. Chatterjee S. & Hadi A.S. 2012. Regression Analysis by Example, 5th ed. New York: Wiley. 93. Long J.S. & Freese J. 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

94. Gauchat G. 2012. “Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010.” American Sociological Review 77:167–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0003122412438225 95. Funk C. 2020. “Key findings about Americans’ confidence in science and their views on scientists’ role in society.” Pew Research Center, February 12. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/12/ key-findings-about-americans-confidence-in-science-and-their-views-on-scientists-role-in-society/ 96. Mann M. & Schleifer C. 2020. “Love the science, hate the scientists: Conservative identity protects belief in science and undermines trust in scientists.” Social Forces 99(1):305–32. https://doi.org/ doi:10.1093/sf/soz156 97. Hamilton L.C. 2015. “Conservative and liberal views of science: Does trust depend on topic?” Dur- ham, NH: Carsey School of Public Policy. https://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.242 98. Gauchat G., O’Brien T. & Mirosa O. 2017. “The legitimacy of environmental scientists in the public sphere.” Climatic Change 143(3–4):297–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2015-z 99. Pechar E., Bernauer T. & Mayer F. 2018. “Beyond political ideology: The impact of attitudes towards government and corporations on trust in science. Science Communication 40(3):291–313. https://doi. org/10.1177/1075547018763970 100. Hamilton L.C. & Safford T.G. 2020. “Ideology affects trust in science agencies during a pandemic.” Durham, NH: Carsey School of Public Policy. https://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.389 PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 19 / 20

101. Nisbet E.C., Cooper K.E & Garrett R.K. 2015. “The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis)trust science.” Annals of the AAPSS. 658(1):36–66. https://doi. org/10.1177/0002716214555474 102. Kahan D.M., H-Jenkins-Smith & D. Braman. 2011. “Cultural cognition of the scientific consensus.” Journal of Risk Research 14(2):147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 103. Ayala F.J. 2008. “Science, evolution, and creationism.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences of the United States of America 105(1):3–4. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711608105 PMID: 18178613 104. Schnaiberg A. 1977. “Obstacles to environmental research by scientists and technologists: A social structural analysis.” Social Problems 24:500–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/800121 105. Schnaiberg A. 1980. The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press. 106. McCright A.M., Dentzman K., Charters M. & Dietz T. 2013. “The influence of political ideology on trust in science.” Environmental Research Letters 8(4):044029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/ 044029 107. Motta M., Motta G. & Stecula D. 2023. “Sick as a dog? The prevalence, politicization, and health policy consequences of canine vaccine hesitancy (CVH).” Vaccine 41:5946–5950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. vaccine.2023.08.059 PMID: 37640567 108. Merkley E. 2020. “Anti-intellectualism, populism, and motivated resistance to expert consensus.” Pub- lic Opinion Quarterly 84:24–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz053

109. Nichols T. 2017. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 110. Eichengreen B. 2018. The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 111. Diaz Ruiz C. & Nilsson T. 2022. “Disinformation and echo chambers: How disinformation circulates in social media through identity-driven controversies.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing https://doi. org/10.1177/07439156221103852 112. Salvanto A., Khanna K., De Pinto J. & Backus F. 2023. “CBS News poll finds Trump’s big lead grows, as GOP voters dismiss indictments.” CBS News, August 20. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump- poll-indictments-2023-08-20 113. Bump P. 2023. “Trumpworld is a bubble within a bubble.” Washington Post, August 21. https://www. washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/21/trump-base-fox-news-debate/ 114. Jong-Fast M. 2023. “Not up for debate: Republicans can’t quit Trump.” Vanity Fair, August 23. https:// www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/08/donald-trump-republican-debate 115. McCright A.M., Dunlap R.E. & Marquart-Pyatt S.T. 2015. “Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union.” Environmental Politics 25(2):338–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09644016.2015.1090371 116. Hornsey M.J., Harris E.A. & Fielding K.S. 2018. “Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conserva- tism and climate scepticism across nations.” Nature Climate Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558- 018-0157-2

117. Tesler M. 2018. “Elite domination of public doubts about climate change (not evolution).” Political Com- munication 35(2):306–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1380092 118. Czarnek G., Kossowska M. & Szwed P. 2021. “Right-wing ideology reduces the effects of education on climate change beliefs in more developed countries.” Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41558-020-00930-6 119. Kulin J., Seva¨ I.J. & Dunlap R.E. 2021. “Nationalist ideology, rightwing populism, and public views about climate change in Europe.” Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021. 1898879 PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 20 / 20