Thông tin tài nguyên

Trumpism, climate and COVID: Social bases of the new science rejection

pmc-PMC10781192.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 20 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 19 · Đoạn 54Vị trí nguồn

78. Pew Research Center. 2017. “The partisan divide on political values grows even wider.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political- values-grows-even-wider/ accessed 6/29/2022. 79. Hamilton L.C., Lambert J.E., Lawhon L.A., Salerno J. & Hartter J. 2020. “Wolves are back: Sociopoliti- cal identity and opinions on management of Canis lupus.” Conservation Science and Practice 2(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.213 80. Hartter J., Hamilton L.C., Ducey M.J., Boag A.E., Salerno J.D., Christoffersen N.D., Oester P.T., Pal- ace M.W. & Stevens F.R. 2020. “Finding common ground: Agreement on increasing wildfire risks crosses political lines.” Environmental Research Letters 15(6). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ ab7ace 81. Hamilton L.C. 2016. “Where is the North Pole? An election-year survey on global change.” Durham, NH: Carsey School of Public Policy. https://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.274 82. Hamilton L.C. 2018. “Self-assessed understanding of climate change.” Climatic Change 151(2):349– 362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2305-0 83. Economist/YouGov Poll. 2021. “July 10–13–1500 U.S. Adult Citizens.” https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/ w2zmwpzsq0/econTabReport.pdf accessed 7/5/2022 84. Farleigh Dickinson University. 2022. “2020 election conspiracy believers more likely to embrace big- foot, flat Earth.” https://www.fdu.edu/news/fdu-poll-2020-election-conspiracies-more-likely-to- embrace-bigfoot-flat-earth/ accessed 7/5/2022.

Trang 19 · Đoạn 55Vị trí nguồn

85. Jones R.E. & Dunlap R.E. 1992. “The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?” Rural Sociology 57(1):28–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x 86. Xiao C. & McCright A.M. 2007. “Environmental concern and sociodemographic variables: A study of statistical models.” Journal of Environmental Education 38(2):3–14. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38. 1.3-14 87. D’Antonio M. 2022. “DeSantis is trying to out-Trump Trump.” CNN, April 30. https://www.cnn.com/ 2022/04/30/opinions/desantis-trumpism-2-0-dantonio/index.html 88. Lewis M. 2021. “Chris Christie wants to out-Trump Trump.” Daily Beast, June 22. https://www. thedailybeast.com/chris-christie-wants-to-out-trump-trump 89. Azari J. 2022. “How Republicans are thinking about Trumpism without Trump.” FiveThirtyEight, March 15. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-republicans-are-thinking-about-trumpism-without-trump/ 90. Acock A.C. 2013. Discovering Structural Equation Modeling Using Stata, revised edition. College Sta- tion, TX: Stata Press. 91. Shoots-Reinhard B., Goodwin R., Bja¨ lkebring P., Markowitz D.M., Silverstein M.C. & Peters E. 2021. “Ability-related political polarization in the COVID-19 pandemic.” Intelligence 88. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.intell.2021.101580 PMID: 34566199 92. Chatterjee S. & Hadi A.S. 2012. Regression Analysis by Example, 5th ed. New York: Wiley. 93. Long J.S. & Freese J. 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

Trang 19 · Đoạn 56Vị trí nguồn

94. Gauchat G. 2012. “Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010.” American Sociological Review 77:167–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0003122412438225 95. Funk C. 2020. “Key findings about Americans’ confidence in science and their views on scientists’ role in society.” Pew Research Center, February 12. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/02/12/ key-findings-about-americans-confidence-in-science-and-their-views-on-scientists-role-in-society/ 96. Mann M. & Schleifer C. 2020. “Love the science, hate the scientists: Conservative identity protects belief in science and undermines trust in scientists.” Social Forces 99(1):305–32. https://doi.org/ doi:10.1093/sf/soz156 97. Hamilton L.C. 2015. “Conservative and liberal views of science: Does trust depend on topic?” Dur- ham, NH: Carsey School of Public Policy. https://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.242 98. Gauchat G., O’Brien T. & Mirosa O. 2017. “The legitimacy of environmental scientists in the public sphere.” Climatic Change 143(3–4):297–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2015-z 99. Pechar E., Bernauer T. & Mayer F. 2018. “Beyond political ideology: The impact of attitudes towards government and corporations on trust in science. Science Communication 40(3):291–313. https://doi. org/10.1177/1075547018763970 100. Hamilton L.C. & Safford T.G. 2020. “Ideology affects trust in science agencies during a pandemic.” Durham, NH: Carsey School of Public Policy. https://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.389 PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID

Trang 19 · Đoạn 57Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 19 / 20