Thông tin tài nguyên

Trumpism, climate and COVID: Social bases of the new science rejection

pmc-PMC10781192.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 20 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 18 · Đoạn 50Vị trí nguồn

56. Hamilton L.C., Lemcke-Stampone M. & Grimm C. 2018. “Cold winters warming? Perceptions of cli- mate change in the North Country.” Weather, Climate, and Society 10(October):641–652. https://doi. org/10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0020.1 57. Hamilton L.C., Bell E., Hartter J. & Salerno J.D. 2018b. “A change in the wind? U.S. public views on renewable energy and climate compared.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 8(11). https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s13705-018-0152-5 58. Hamilton L.C. & Safford T.G. 2015. “Environmental views from the coast: Public concern about local to global marine issues.” Society and Natural Resources 28(1):57–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08941920.2014.933926 59. Hamilton L.C., Hartter J., Safford T.G. & Stevens F.R. 2014. “Rural environmental concern: Effects of position, partisanship and place.” Rural Sociology 79(2):257–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12023 60. Berinsky A.J. 2009. In Time of war: Understanding American Public Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 61. Guber D.L. 2017. “Partisan Cueing and Polarization in Public Opinion about Climate Change.” In, The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.306 62. Zaller J.R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 63. Merkley E. & Stecula D.A. 2018. “Party elites or manufactured doubt? The informational context of cli- mate change polarization.” Science Communication 40(2):258–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1075547018760334

Trang 18 · Đoạn 51Vị trí nguồn

64. Carmichael J.T., Brulle R.J. & Huxster J.K. 2017. “The great divide: Understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014.” Climatic Change 141:599–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1 65. Dunlap R.E. & McCright A.M. 2015. “Challenging climate change: The denial countermovement.” Pp. 300–332 in Dunlap R.E. & Brulle R.J. (eds), Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. 66. Merkley E. & Stecula D. 2020. “Party cues in the news: Democratic elites, Republican backlash, and the dynamics of climate skepticism.” British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0007123420000113 67. Tesler M. 2018. “Elite domination of public doubts about climate change (not evolution).” Political Com- munication 35(2):306–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1380092 68. Green J., Edgerton J., Naftel D., Shoub K., & Cranmer S.J. 2020. “Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic.” Science Advances 6(28):eabc2717. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.306 PMID: 32923600 69. Pink S.L., Chu J., Druckman J., Rand D.G. & Willer R. 2021. “Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans.” PsyArXiv Preprints https://psyarxiv.com/f9jq5 https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.2106559118 PMID: 34312254 70. Corner A., Whitmarsh L. & Xenias D. 2012. “Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate

Trang 18 · Đoạn 52Vị trí nguồn

change: Biased assimilation and attitude polarisation.” Climatic Change 114:463–478. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6 71. Campbell T.H. & Kay A.C. 2014. “Solution aversion: On the relation between ideology and motivated disbelief.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107(5):809–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0037963 PMID: 25347128 72. Druckman J.N. & McGrath M.C. 2019. “The Evidence for Motivated Reasoning in Climate Change Preference Formation.” Nature Climate Change 9:111–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360- 1 73. Kraft P.W., Lodge M., & Taber C.S. 2015. “Why people ‘don’t trust the evidence’: Motivated reasoning and scientific beliefs.” Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science 658:121–33. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0002716214554758 74. Kunda Z. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3):480–98. https:// doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 PMID: 2270237 75. Taber C.S. & Lodge M. 2006. “Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3):755–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x 76. Iyengar S. & Westwood S.J. 2015. “Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59:690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152 77. Pew Research Center. 2016. “Partisanship and political animosity in 2016.” Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/ accessed 6/29/2022. PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID

Trang 18 · Đoạn 53Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 18 / 20