Thông tin tài nguyên

Trumpism, climate and COVID: Social bases of the new science rejection

pmc-PMC10781192.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 20 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 17 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

34. Hofstadter R. 1964. “The paranoid style in American politics.” Harper’s Magazine November:77–86. Retrieved from https://faculty.washington.edu/jwilker/353/Hofstadter.pdf 35. Del Vicario M., Bessi A., Zollo F., Petroni F., Scala A., Caldarelli G., Stanley H.E. & Quattrociocchi W. 2015. “The spreading of misinformation online.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(3):554–559. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517441113 36. Van der Linden A., Panagopoulos C., Azevedo F. & Jost J.T. 2020. “The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking.” Political Psychology https://doi. org/10.1111/pops.126810162-895X42(1). 37. Lewandowsky S., Gignac G.E., & Oberauer K. 2013. “The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science.” PLOS One 8(10):e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0075637 PMID: 24098391 38. Lewandowsky S., Cook J. & Lloyd E. 2016. “The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism.” Synthese 195:175–196. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11229-016-1198-6 39. Goldberg Z.J. & Richey S. 2020. “Anti-vaccination beliefs and unrelated conspiracy theories.” World Affairs https://doi.org/10.1177/0043820020920554 40. Cassese E.C., Farhart C.E. & Miller J.M. 2020. “Gender differences in COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs.” Politics & Gender https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000409 41. Hamilton L.C. 2022. “Conspiracy vs. science: A survey of US public beliefs.” Durham, NH: Carsey

Trang 17 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

School of Public Policy. https://scholars.unh.edu/carsey/448/ 42. Jamieson K.H. & Albarracin D. 2020. “The relation between media consumption and misinformation at the outset of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the US.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, Special Issue on Covid and Misinformation. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-012 43. Hamilton L.C. 2008. “Who cares about polar regions? Results from a survey of U.S. public opinion.” Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 40(4):671–678. https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(07-105) [HAMILTON]2.0.CO;2 44. Safford T.G., Whitmore E.H. & Hamilton L.C. 2020. “Questioning scientific practice: Linking beliefs about scientists, science agencies, and climate change.” Environmental Sociology 6(2):194–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2019.1696008 45. Shao W., Keim B.D., Garland J.C. & Hamilton L.C. 2014. “Weather, climate, and the economy: Explaining risk perceptions of global warming, 2001–2010.” Weather, Climate, and Society 6(1):119– 134. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00029.1 46. Shao W., Garand J.C., Keim B.D. & Hamilton L.C. 2016. “Science, scientists, and local weather: Understanding mass perceptions of global warming.” Social Science Quarterly 97(5):1023–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12317 47. Tranter B. 2020. “Does public knowledge of climate change really matter in Australia?, Environmental Communication 14(4):537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1696853 48. Hamilton L.C. 2011. “Education, politics and opinions about climate change: Evidence for interaction

Trang 17 · Đoạn 48Vị trí nguồn

effects.” Climatic Change 104:231–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8 49. Drummond C. & Fischhoff B. 2017. “Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(36):9587–9592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114 PMID: 28827344 50. Hamilton L.C., Cutler M.J. & Schaefer A. 2012. “Public knowledge and concern about polar-region warming.” Polar Geography 35(2):155–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2012.684155 51. Kahan D.M., Peters E., Wittlin M., Slovic P., Ouellette L.L., Braman D. & Mandel G. 2012. “The polariz- ing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks.” Nature Climate Change 2:732–735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547 52. Zummo L., Donovan B. & Busch K.C. 2020. “Complex influences of mechanistic knowledge, world- view, and quantitative reasoning on climate change discourse: Evidence for ideologically motivated reasoning among youth.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58:95–127. https://doi.org/10. 1002/tea.21648 53. Hamilton L.C., Hartter J. & Saito K. 2015. “Trust in scientists on climate change and vaccines.” SAGE Open https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015602752 54. Hamilton L.C., Wake C.P., Hartter J., Safford T.G. & Puchlopek A. 2016. “Flood realities, perceptions, and the depth of divisions on climate.” Sociology 50:913–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0038038516648547 PMID: 27818533 55. Hamilton L.C., Hartter J., Keim B.D., Boag A.E., Palace M.W., Stevens F.R. & Ducey M.J. 2016. “Wild-

Trang 17 · Đoạn 49Vị trí nguồn

fire, climate, and perceptions in northeast Oregon.” Regional Environmental Change 16:1819–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0914-y PLOS ONE Trumpism, climate and COVID PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293059 January 10, 2024 17 / 20