Drivers of urban biodiversity in Mexico and joint risks from future urban expansion, climate change, and urban heat island effect

35. Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Whittaker RJ. The Species-area Relationship: Theory and Application. Cambridge University Press; 2020. 36. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton university press; 1967. 37. Carbo´ -Ramı´rez P, Zuria I. The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Land- scape and Urban Planning. 2011; 100: 213–222. 38. MacGregor-Fors I, Morales-Pe´ rez L, Schondube JE. Does size really matter? Species—area relation- ships in human settlements. Diversity and Distributions. 2011; 17: 112–121. 39. Charre GM, Hurtado JAZ, Ne´ve G, Ponce-Mendoza A, Corcuera P. Relationship between habitat traits and bird diversity and composition in selected urban green areas of Mexico City. Ornitologia Neotropi- cal. 2013; 24: 279–297. 40. Lambert MR, Donihue CM. Urban biodiversity management using evolutionary tools. Nature ecology & evolution. 2020; 4: 903–910. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1193-7 PMID: 32393868 41. Ferenc M, Sedla´ček O, Fuchs R, Dinetti M, Fraissinet M, Storch D. Are cities different? patterns of spe- cies richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species assemblages in e urope. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2014; 23: 479–489. 42. Uchida K, Blakey RV, Burger JR, Cooper DS, Niesner CA, Blumstein DT. Opinion: urban biodiversity and the importance of scale. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2020. 43. Filloy J, Grosso S, Bellocq MI. Urbanization altered latitudinal patterns of bird diversity-environment

relationships in the southern Neotropics. Urban ecosystems. 2015; 18: 777–791. 44. Triantis KA, Guilhaumon F, Whittaker RJ. The island species—area relationship: biology and statistics. Journal of Biogeography. 2012; 39: 215–231. 45. Matthews TJ, Guilhaumon F, Triantis KA, Borregaard MK, Whittaker RJ. On the form of species—area relationships in habitat islands and true islands. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2016; 25: 847– 858. 46. Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Whittaker RJ, Guilhaumon F. sars: an R package for fitting, evaluating and comparing species—area relationship models. Ecography. 2019; 42: 1446–1455. 47. CONABIO. Sistema Nacional de Informacio´ n sobre Biodiversidad. Registros de ejemplares. Comisio´ n Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Ciudad de Me´ xico. Me´xico. 2020. 48. Flores-Villela O, Garcı´a-Va´ zquez UO. Biodiversity of reptiles in Mexico. Revista mexicana de biodiver- sidad. 2014; 85: S467–S475. 49. Parra-Olea G, Flores-Villela O, Mendoza-Almeralla C. Biodiversidad de anfibios en Me´xico. Revista mexicana de biodiversidad. 2014; 85: 460–466. 50. Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigu¨enza AG, Martı´nez-Meyer E. Digital Accessible Knowledge and well-inven- toried sites for birds in Mexico: baseline sites for measuring faunistic change. PeerJ. 2016; 4: e2362. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2362 PMID: 27651986 51. Chapman AD, Wieczorek J. Guide to best practices for georeferencing. Copenhagen: Global Biodi- versity Information Facility. 2006; 1–77.

52. IUCN. The IUCN red list of threatened species, Version 2020–2. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Birdlife International; 2020. 53. Roll U, Feldman A, Novosolov M, Allison A, Bauer AM, Bernard R, et al. The global distribution of tetra- pods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2017; 1: 1677– 1682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0332-2 PMID: 28993667 54. Birdlife International, NatureServe. Bird species distribution maps of the world, Version 5.0. Cam- bridge, UK: Birdlife International; 2015. 55. Haro A, Mendoza-Ponce A, Caldero´n O, Velasco JA, Estrada F. Evaluating risk and possible adapta- tions to climate change under a socio-ecological system approach. Frontiers in Climate. 2021; 3: 54. 56. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate sur- faces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 2005; 25: 1965–1978. 57. Simard M, Pinto N, Fisher JB, Baccini A. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 2011; 116. 58. Tuanmu M-N, Jetz W. A global, remote sensing-based characterization of terrestrial habitat heteroge- neity for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2015; 24: 1329– 1339. 59. Wilson AM, Jetz W. Remotely sensed high-resolution global cloud dynamics for predicting ecosystem and biodiversity distributions. PLoS biology. 2016; 14: e1002415. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio. 1002415 PMID: 27031693

PLOS ONE Urban biodiversity and anthropogenic pressures PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308522 October 4, 2024 17 / 19