Thông tin tài nguyên

Drivers of urban biodiversity in Mexico and joint risks from future urban expansion, climate change, and urban heat island effect

pmc-PMC11451986.pdf · Phiên bản 1 · 19 trang

18
Bản gốc
Trang 16 · Đoạn 41Vị trí nguồn

11. Nielsen AB, Van Den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch CK. Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban ecosystems. 2014; 17: 305–327. 12. Beninde J, Veith M, Hochkirch A. Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors deter- mining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecology letters. 2015; 18: 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ele.12427 PMID: 25865805 13. Lepczyk CA, Aronson MF, Evans KL, Goddard MA, Lerman SB, MacIvor JS. Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conserva- tion. BioScience. 2017; 67: 799–807. 14. MacGregor-Fors I, Escobar-Iba´ ñez JF. Avian ecology in Latin American cityscapes. Springer; 2017. 15. Knapp S, Aronson MF, Carpenter E, Herrera-Montes A, Jung K, Kotze DJ, et al. A research agenda for urban biodiversity in the global extinction crisis. BioScience. 2021; 71: 268–279. 16. Seto KC, Gu¨ neralp B, Hutyra LR. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012; 109: 16083– 16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109 PMID: 22988086 17. van Vliet J. Direct and indirect loss of natural area from urban expansion. Nature Sustainability. 2019; 2: 755–763. 18. Chen G, Li X, Liu X, Chen Y, Liang X, Leng J, et al. Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nature communications. 2020; 11: 1–12.

Trang 16 · Đoạn 42Vị trí nguồn

19. McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK. The future of urban biodiversity research: moving beyond the ‘low-hanging fruit.’ Urban Ecosystems. 2013; 16: 397–409. 20. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GA, Gerlach J, Hoffmann M, Lamoreux JF, et al. Global biodi- versity conservation priorities. science. 2006; 313: 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127609 PMID: 16825561 21. Jenkins CN, Pimm SL, Joppa LN. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013; 110: E2602–E2610. https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1302251110 PMID: 23803854 22. Howard C, Flather CH, Stephens PA. A global assessment of the drivers of threatened terrestrial spe- cies richness. Nature communications. 2020; 11: 1–10. 23. Koleff P, Sobero´n J, Arita H, Da´ vila P, Flores-Villela O, Golubov J, et al. Patrones de diversidad espa- cial en grupos selectos de especies. Capital natural de Me´ xico. 2008; 1: 323–364. 24. Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Munguı´a M, Lira-Noriega A, Sa´ nchez-Cordero V, Flores-Villela O, Navarro- Sigu¨ enza A, et al. Spatial scale and β-diversity of terrestrial vertebrates in Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2014; 85: 918–930. 25. Sinervo B, Mendez-De-La-Cruz F, Miles DB, Heulin B, Bastiaans E, Villagra´ n-Santa Cruz M, et al. Ero- sion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science. 2010; 328: 894–899. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1184695 PMID: 20466932 26. Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigu¨enza AG, Martı´nez-Meyer E, Cuervo-Robayo AP, Berlanga H, Sobero´n J.

Trang 16 · Đoạn 43Vị trí nguồn

Twentieth century turnover of Mexican endemic avifaunas: Landscape change versus climate drivers. Science advances. 2015; 1: e1400071. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400071 PMID: 26601171 27. Mendoza-Ponce AV, Corona-Nu´ñez RO, Kraxner F, Estrada F. Spatial prioritization for biodiversity conservation in a megadiverse country. Anthropocene. 2020; 32: 100267. 28. Mayani-Para´ s F, Botello F, Castañeda S, Munguı´a-Carrara M, Sa´ nchez-Cordero V. Cumulative habi- tat loss increases conservation threats on endemic species of terrestrial vertebrates in Mexico. Biologi- cal Conservation. 2021; 253: 108864. 29. Warren P, Harlan S, Boone C, Lerman S, Shochat E, Kinzig A. Urban Ecology. In: Kevin JG, editor. Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 172–201. 30. Aronson MF, Nilon CH, Lepczyk CA, Parker TS, Warren PS, Cilliers SS, et al. Hierarchical filters deter- mine community assembly of urban species pools. Ecology. 2016; 97: 2952–2963. https://doi.org/10. 1002/ecy.1535 PMID: 27870023 31. Nowak DJ. Urban Biodiversity andClimate Change. Urban biodiversity and design. 2010; 101. 32. Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Gu¨ neralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald RI, et al. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer Nature; 2013. 33. McDonald RI, Mansur AV, Ascensão F, Crossman K, Elmqvist T, Gonzalez A, et al. Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity. Nature Sustainability. 2020; 3: 16–24.

Trang 16 · Đoạn 44Vị trí nguồn

34. Estrada F, Velasco JA, Martinez-Arroyo A, Caldero´ n-Bustamante O. An Analysis of Current Sustain- ability of Mexican Cities and Their Exposure to Climate Change. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2020; 8: 25. PLOS ONE Urban biodiversity and anthropogenic pressures PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308522 October 4, 2024 16 / 19

Trang 17 · Đoạn 45Vị trí nguồn

35. Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Whittaker RJ. The Species-area Relationship: Theory and Application. Cambridge University Press; 2020. 36. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton university press; 1967. 37. Carbo´ -Ramı´rez P, Zuria I. The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Land- scape and Urban Planning. 2011; 100: 213–222. 38. MacGregor-Fors I, Morales-Pe´ rez L, Schondube JE. Does size really matter? Species—area relation- ships in human settlements. Diversity and Distributions. 2011; 17: 112–121. 39. Charre GM, Hurtado JAZ, Ne´ve G, Ponce-Mendoza A, Corcuera P. Relationship between habitat traits and bird diversity and composition in selected urban green areas of Mexico City. Ornitologia Neotropi- cal. 2013; 24: 279–297. 40. Lambert MR, Donihue CM. Urban biodiversity management using evolutionary tools. Nature ecology & evolution. 2020; 4: 903–910. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1193-7 PMID: 32393868 41. Ferenc M, Sedla´ček O, Fuchs R, Dinetti M, Fraissinet M, Storch D. Are cities different? patterns of spe- cies richness and beta diversity of urban bird communities and regional species assemblages in e urope. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2014; 23: 479–489. 42. Uchida K, Blakey RV, Burger JR, Cooper DS, Niesner CA, Blumstein DT. Opinion: urban biodiversity and the importance of scale. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2020. 43. Filloy J, Grosso S, Bellocq MI. Urbanization altered latitudinal patterns of bird diversity-environment

Trang 17 · Đoạn 46Vị trí nguồn

relationships in the southern Neotropics. Urban ecosystems. 2015; 18: 777–791. 44. Triantis KA, Guilhaumon F, Whittaker RJ. The island species—area relationship: biology and statistics. Journal of Biogeography. 2012; 39: 215–231. 45. Matthews TJ, Guilhaumon F, Triantis KA, Borregaard MK, Whittaker RJ. On the form of species—area relationships in habitat islands and true islands. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2016; 25: 847– 858. 46. Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Whittaker RJ, Guilhaumon F. sars: an R package for fitting, evaluating and comparing species—area relationship models. Ecography. 2019; 42: 1446–1455. 47. CONABIO. Sistema Nacional de Informacio´ n sobre Biodiversidad. Registros de ejemplares. Comisio´ n Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Ciudad de Me´ xico. Me´xico. 2020. 48. Flores-Villela O, Garcı´a-Va´ zquez UO. Biodiversity of reptiles in Mexico. Revista mexicana de biodiver- sidad. 2014; 85: S467–S475. 49. Parra-Olea G, Flores-Villela O, Mendoza-Almeralla C. Biodiversidad de anfibios en Me´xico. Revista mexicana de biodiversidad. 2014; 85: 460–466. 50. Peterson AT, Navarro-Sigu¨enza AG, Martı´nez-Meyer E. Digital Accessible Knowledge and well-inven- toried sites for birds in Mexico: baseline sites for measuring faunistic change. PeerJ. 2016; 4: e2362. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2362 PMID: 27651986 51. Chapman AD, Wieczorek J. Guide to best practices for georeferencing. Copenhagen: Global Biodi- versity Information Facility. 2006; 1–77.

Trang 17 · Đoạn 47Vị trí nguồn

52. IUCN. The IUCN red list of threatened species, Version 2020–2. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Birdlife International; 2020. 53. Roll U, Feldman A, Novosolov M, Allison A, Bauer AM, Bernard R, et al. The global distribution of tetra- pods reveals a need for targeted reptile conservation. Nature Ecology and Evolution. 2017; 1: 1677– 1682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0332-2 PMID: 28993667 54. Birdlife International, NatureServe. Bird species distribution maps of the world, Version 5.0. Cam- bridge, UK: Birdlife International; 2015. 55. Haro A, Mendoza-Ponce A, Caldero´n O, Velasco JA, Estrada F. Evaluating risk and possible adapta- tions to climate change under a socio-ecological system approach. Frontiers in Climate. 2021; 3: 54. 56. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate sur- faces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 2005; 25: 1965–1978. 57. Simard M, Pinto N, Fisher JB, Baccini A. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences. 2011; 116. 58. Tuanmu M-N, Jetz W. A global, remote sensing-based characterization of terrestrial habitat heteroge- neity for biodiversity and ecosystem modelling. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2015; 24: 1329– 1339. 59. Wilson AM, Jetz W. Remotely sensed high-resolution global cloud dynamics for predicting ecosystem and biodiversity distributions. PLoS biology. 2016; 14: e1002415. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio. 1002415 PMID: 27031693

Trang 17 · Đoạn 48Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE Urban biodiversity and anthropogenic pressures PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308522 October 4, 2024 17 / 19

Trang 18 · Đoạn 49Vị trí nguồn

60. Lobo JM, Hortal J, Yela JL, Milla´ n A, Sa´ nchez-Ferna´ ndez D, Garcı´a-Rosello´ E, et al. KnowBR: An application to map the geographical variation of survey effort and identify well-surveyed areas from bio- diversity databases. Ecological Indicators. 2018; 91: 241–248. 61. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin P, O’hara R, et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R package. Version; 2017. 62. Anderson D, Burnham K. Model selection and multi-model inference. Second NY: Springer-Verlag. 2004; 63: 10. 63. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer Science & Business Media; 2009. 64. Cafri G, Bailey BA. Understanding variable effects from black box prediction: Quantifying effects in tree ensembles using partial dependence. Journal of Data Science. 2016; 14: 67–95. 65. Evans J, Murphy M. rfUtilities. R package version 2.1–3. 2018. 66. Van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, den Elzen MG, Kram T, van Vliet J, Deetman S, et al. RCP2.6: exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 C. Climatic change. 2011; 109: 95–116. 67. Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, Cho C, Chirkov V, Fischer G, et al. RCP 8.5—A scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic change. 2011; 109: 33–57. 68. Karl TR, Diaz HF, Kukla G. Urbanization: Its detection and effect in the United States climate record. Journal of climate. 1988; 1: 1099–1123. 69. Oke TR. The energetic basis of the urban heat island. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 1982; 108: 1–24.

Trang 18 · Đoạn 50Vị trí nguồn

70. Oke TR. Urban Climatology and Its Applications with Special Regard to Tropical Areas: Proceedings of the Technical Conference [held At] Mexico DF, 26–30 November 1984. World Meteorological Orga- nization; 1986. 71. Jones P, Kelly P, Goodess C, Karl T. The effect of urban warming on the Northern Hemisphere tem- perature average. Journal of Climate. 1989; 2: 285–290. 72. Estrada F, Botzen WW, Tol RS. A global economic assessment of city policies to reduce climate change impacts. Nature Climate Change. 2017; 7: 403–406. 73. Gaston KJ. Urban ecology. Oxford University Press; 2010. 74. Fournier B, Frey D, Moretti M. The origin of urban communities: From the regional species pool to com- munity assemblages in city. Journal of Biogeography. 2020; 47: 615–629. 75. Lomolino MV. The species-area relationship: new challenges for an old pattern. Progress in Physical Geography. 2001; 25: 1–21. 76. Lomolino MV, Weiser M. Towards a more general species-area relationship: diversity on all islands, great and small. Journal of biogeography. 2001; 431–445. 77. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, et al. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2003; 100: 8788–8792. https://doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.1537557100 PMID: 12847293 78. Smallbone LT, Luck GW, Wassens S. Anuran species in urban landscapes: Relationships with bio- physical, built environment and socio-economic factors. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2011; 101: 43–51.

Trang 18 · Đoạn 51Vị trí nguồn

79. Lepczyk C, Warren P, Machabe´e L, Kinzig A, Mertig A. Urban bird ecology and conservation. In: Lepc- zyk PS Christopher A; Warren, editor. University of California Press; 2012. p. 267. 80. Martı´nez-Meyer E., Velasco J. A. Contemporary climate change impacts on Mexican fauna. In Mexi- can Fauna in the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2023; pp. 437–463. 81. Alberti M, Correa C, Marzluff JM, Hendry AP, Palkovacs EP, Gotanda KM, et al. Global urban signa- tures of phenotypic change in animal and plant populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114: 8951–8956. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606034114 PMID: 28049817 82. Esperon-Rodriguez M, Rymer PD, Power SA, Challis A, Marchin RM, Tjoelker MG. Functional adapta- tions and trait plasticity of urban trees along a climatic gradient. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2020; 54: 126771. 83. Knapp S, Ku¨hn I, Mosbrugger V, Klotz S. Do protected areas in urban and rural landscapes differ in species diversity? Biodiversity and Conservation. 2008; 17: 1595–1612. 84. Bonacic C., Almuna R., Ibarra J. T. Biodiversity conservation requires management of feral domestic animals. Trends in ecology & evolution, 2019; 34(8), 683–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.05. 002 PMID: 31235309 85. Shukla P, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Po¨rtner H, Roberts D, et al. IPCC, 2019: Cli- mate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, PLOS ONE Urban biodiversity and anthropogenic pressures

Trang 18 · Đoạn 52Vị trí nguồn

PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308522 October 4, 2024 18 / 19

Trang 19 · Đoạn 53Vị trí nguồn

sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. 2019. 86. Mendoza-Ponce A, Corona-Nunez R, Kraxner F, Leduc S, Patrizio P. Identifying effects of land use cover changes and climate change on terrestrial ecosystems and carbon stocks in Mexico. Global environmental change. 2018; 53: 12–23. 87. Chown SL, Van Rensburg BJ, Gaston KJ, Rodrigues AS, Van Jaarsveld AS. Energy, species richness, and human population size: conservation implications at a national scale. Ecological Applications. 2003; 13: 1233–1241. 88. Pautasso M. Scale dependence of the correlation between human population presence and vertebrate and plant species richness. Ecology letters. 2007; 10: 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248. 2006.00993.x PMID: 17204113 89. Evans K, Gaston K. People, energy and avian species richness. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2005; 14: 187–196. 90. Palmer GC, Fitzsimons JA, Antos MJ, White JG. Determinants of native avian richness in suburban remnant vegetation: implications for conservation planning. Biological conservation. 2008; 141: 2329– 2341. 91. Adams WM, Aveling R, Brockington D, Dickson B, Elliott J, Hutton J, et al. Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. science. 2004; 306: 1146–1149. https://doi.org/10.1126/science. 1097920 PMID: 15539593 92. Fisher B, Christopher T. Poverty and biodiversity: measuring the overlap of human poverty and the bio- diversity hotspots. Ecological economics. 2007; 62: 93–101.

Trang 19 · Đoạn 54Vị trí nguồn

93. Turner WR, Brandon K, Brooks TM, Gascon C, Gibbs HK, Lawrence KS, et al. Global biodiversity con- servation and the alleviation of poverty. BioScience. 2012; 62: 85–92. 94. Shmida A, Wilson MV. Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of biogeography. 1985; 1– 20. 95. Brown JH, Kodric-Brown A. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology. 1977; 58: 445–449. 96. Pulliam HR. Sources and sinks: empirical evidence and population consequences. Population dynam- ics in ecological space and time. 1996. 97. Mouquet N, Loreau M. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. The American Natural- ist. 2003; 162: 544–557. https://doi.org/10.1086/378857 PMID: 14618534 98. Quintero I, Jetz W. Global elevational diversity and diversification of birds. Nature. 2018; 555: 246– 250. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25794 PMID: 29466335 99. Garcı´a-Rodrı´guez A, Velasco JA, Villalobos F, Parra-Olea G. Effects of evolutionary time, speciation rates and local abiotic conditions on the origin and maintenance of amphibian montane diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2021; 30: 674–684. 100. Hutchinson GE. Cold spring harbor symposium on quantitative biology. Concluding remarks. 1957; 22: 415–427. 101. Ricklefs RE, Schluter D. Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical per- spectives. University of Chicago Press Chicago; 1993. 102. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielbo¨rger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, et al. Animal species diversity

Trang 19 · Đoạn 55Vị trí nguồn

driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of biogeogra- phy. 2004; 31: 79–92. 103. Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GV, Underwood EC, et al. Terres- trial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on EarthA new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience. 2001; 51: 933–938. 104. Currie DJ, Mittelbach GG, Cornell HV, Field R, Gue´ gan J-F, Hawkins BA, et al. Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecology letters. 2004; 7: 1121–1134. 105. Hurlbert AH, Haskell JP. The effect of energy and seasonality on avian species richness and commu- nity composition. The American Naturalist. 2003; 161: 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/345459 PMID: 12650464 PLOS ONE Urban biodiversity and anthropogenic pressures PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308522 October 4, 2024 19 / 19