Unveiling biogeographical patterns of the ichthyofauna in the Tuichi basin, a biodiversity hotspot in the Bolivian Amazon, using environmental DNA

78. Melo BF, Dorini BF, Foresti F, Oliveira C. Little Divergence Among Mitochondrial Lineages of Prochilo- dus (Teleostei, Characiformes). Front Genet. 2018 Apr 4; 9:107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018. 00107 PMID: 29670644 79. Anderson EP, Jenkins CN, Heilpern S, Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Carvajal-Vallejos FM, Encalada AC, et al. Fragmentation of Andes-to-Amazon connectivity by hydropower dams. SCIENCE ADVANCES. 2018; 8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao1642 PMID: 29399629 80. Finer M, Jenkins CN. Proliferation of hydroelectric dams in the Andean Amazon and implications for Andes-Amazon connectivity. PloS one. 2012; 7(4):e35126. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0035126 PMID: 22529979 81. Lees AC, Peres CA, Fearnside PM, Schneider M, Zuanon JAS. Hydropower and the future of Amazo- nian biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2016 Mar 1; 25(3):451–66. 82. Winemiller KO, McIntyre PB, Castello L, Fluet-Chouinard E, Giarrizzo T, Nam S, et al. DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science (New York, NY). 2016 Jan; 351(6269):128–9. 83. Latrubesse EM, Arima EY, Dunne T, Park E, Baker VR, d’Horta FM, et al. Damming the rivers of the Amazon basin. Nature. 2017 Jun; 546(7658):363–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22333 PMID: 28617466 84. Forsberg BR, Melack JM, Dunne T, Barthem RB, Goulding M, Paiva RCD, et al. The potential impact of new Andean dams on Amazon fluvial ecosystems. PLOS ONE. 2017 Aug 23; 12(8):e0182254. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182254 PMID: 28832638

85. Freeman MC, Pringle CM, Greathouse EA, Freeman BJ. Ecosystem-Level Consequences of Migratory Faunal Depletion Caused by Dams. Biodiversity and Conservation of Shads Worldwide. 2003; 35:255– 66. 86. Pringle CM, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ. Regional Effects of Hydrologic Alterations on Riverine Macro- biota in the New World: Tropical-Temperate Comparisons. BioScience. 2000 Sep 1; 50(9):807–23. 87. Duponchelle F, Isaac V, Van Damme PA, Herrera-R GA, Anderson EP, Cruz Rivetla EA, et al. Conser- vation of migratory fishes in the Amazon basin. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosys- tems. in press; 88. Shaw JLA, Clarke LJ, Wedderburn SD, Barnes TC, Weyrich LS, Cooper A. Comparison of environmen- tal DNA metabarcoding and conventional fish survey methods in a river system. Biological Conserva- tion. 2016 May 1; 197(Supplement C):131–8. 89. Doi H, Uchii K, Takahara T, Matsuhashi S, Yamanaka H, Minamoto T. Use of Droplet Digital PCR for Estimation of Fish Abundance and Biomass in Environmental DNA Surveys. Mahon AR, editor. PLoS ONE. 2015 Mar 23; 10(3):e0122763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122763 PMID: 25799582 90. Pochardt M, Allen JM, Hart T, Miller SDL, Yu DW, Levi T. Environmental DNA facilitates accurate, inex- pensive, and multiyear population estimates of millions of anadromous fish. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020 Mar; 20(2):457–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13123 PMID: 31815343 91. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z-I, Knowler DJ, Le´vêque C, et al. Freshwater bio-

diversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev. 2006 May; 81(02):163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006950 PMID: 16336747 92. Leroy B, Dias MS, Giraud E, Hugueny B, Je´ ze´ quel C, Leprieur F, et al. Global biogeographical regions of freshwater fish species. J Biogeogr. 2019 Nov; 46(11):2407–19. PLOS ONE Fish diversity and distribution in the Tuichi basin PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262357 January 4, 2022 25 / 25