Unveiling biogeographical patterns of the ichthyofauna in the Tuichi basin, a biodiversity hotspot in the Bolivian Amazon, using environmental DNA

58. Cantera I, Cilleros K, Valentini A, Cerdan A, Dejean T, Iribar A, et al. Optimizing environmental DNA sampling effort for fish inventories in tropical streams and rivers. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec; 9(1):3085. https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39399-5 PMID: 30816174 59. Doble CJ, Hipperson H, Salzburger W, Horsburgh GJ, Mwita C, Murrell DJ, et al. Testing the perfor- mance of environmental DNA metabarcoding for surveying highly diverse tropical fish communities: A case study from Lake Tanganyika. Environmental DNA. 2020 Jan; 2(1):24–41. 60. Civade R, Dejean T, Valentini A, Roset N, Raymond J-C, Bonin A, et al. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(6):e0157366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157366 PMID: 27359116 61. Pont D, Rocle M, Valentini A, Civade R, Jean P, Maire A, et al. Environmental DNA reveals quantitative patterns of fish biodiversity in large rivers despite its downstream transportation. Scientific Reports [Internet]. 2018 Dec [cited 2018 Jul 17]; 8(1). Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598- 018-28424-8 PMID: 29991759 62. Dejean T, Valentini A, Duparc A, Pellier-Cuit S, Pompanon F, Taberlet P, et al. Persistence of Environ- mental DNA in Freshwater Ecosystems. Gilbert JA, editor. PLoS ONE. 2011 Aug 8; 6(8):e23398. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023398 PMID: 21858099 63. Strickler KM, Fremier AK, Goldberg CS. Quantifying effects of UV-B, temperature, and pH on eDNA

degradation in aquatic microcosms. Biological Conservation. 2015 Mar; 183:85–92. 64. Curtis AN, Tiemann JS, Douglass SA, Davis MA, Larson ER. High stream flows dilute environmental DNA (eDNA) concentrations and reduce detectability. Yang J, editor. Divers Distrib. 2020 Nov 14; ddi.13196. 65. Jo T, Takao K, Minamoto T. Linking the state of environmental DNA to its application for biomonitoring and stock assessment: Targeting mitochondrial/nuclear genes, and different DNA fragment lengths and particle sizes. Environmental DNA [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 1];n/a(n/a). Available from: https:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/edn3.253 66. McDevitt AD, Sales NG, Browett SS, Sparnenn AO, Mariani S, Wangensteen OS, et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding as an effective and rapid tool for fish monitoring in canals. J Fish Biol. 2019 Aug; 95(2):679–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14053 PMID: 31183856 67. Hugueny B, Oberdorff T, Tedescco PA. Community Ecology of River Fishes: A Large-Scale Perspec- tive. In: American Fisheries Society. Gido K. B. & Jackson D. A.; 2010. p. 29–62. (Community Ecology of Stream Fishes: Concepts, Approaches, and Techniques). 68. Prance GT, Goulding M. The Fishes and the Forest: Explorations in Amazonian Natural History. Britto- nia. 1981 Apr; 33(2):257. 69. Hubert N, Renno J-F. Historical biogeography of South American freshwater fishes. Journal of Biogeog- raphy. 2006; 23. 70. Goulding M. The Fishes and the Forest: Explorations in Amazonian Natural History. University of Cali- fornia Press. Berkeley, California; 1980. 280 p.

71. Jaramillo-Villa U, Maldonado-Ocampo JA, Escobar F. Altitudinal variation in fish assemblage diversity in streams of the central Andes of Colombia. Journal of Fish Biology. 2010 May 18; 76(10):2401–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02629.x PMID: 20557599 72. Anderson EP, Maldonado-Ocampo JA. A Regional Perspective on the Diversity and Conservation of Tropical Andean Fishes: Fishes of the Tropical Andes. Conservation Biology. 2011 Feb; 25(1):30–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01568.x PMID: 20735451 73. Carvajal-Quintero JD, Escobar F, Alvarado F, Villa-Navarro FA. Variation in freshwater fish assem- blages along a regional elevation gradient in the northern Andes, Colombia. 2015; 13. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ece3.1539 PMID: 26257874 74. Maurice-Bourgoin L, Alanoca L, Fraizy P, Vauchel P. Sources of mercury in surface waters of the upper Madeira erosive basins, Bolivia. J Phys IV France. 2003 May; 107:855–8. 75. Doria CRC, Duponchelle F, Lima MAL, Garcia A, Carvajal-Vallejos FM, Me´ ndez CC, et al. Review of Fisheries Resource Use and Status in the Madeira River Basin (Brazil, Bolivia, and Peru) Before Hydro- electric Dam Completion. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 2018 Oct 2; 26(4):494–514. 76. Miranda-Chumacero G, Wallace R, Caldero´n H, Caldero´n G, Willink P, Guerrero M, et al. Distribution of arapaima (Arapaima gigas) (Pisces: Arapaimatidae) in Bolivia: implications in the control and manage- ment of a non-native population. BioInvasions Records. 2012 Jun; 1(2):129–38.

77. Carvajal-Vallejos FM, Salas R, Navia J, Carolsfeld J, Moreno Aulo F, Van Damme PA. Bases te´cnicas para el manejo y aprovechamiento del paiche (Arapaima gigas) en la cuenca amazo´nica boliviana. Bolivia: INIAF-IDRC-Editorial INIA; 2017. 508 p. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170009 PMID: 28095487 PLOS ONE Fish diversity and distribution in the Tuichi basin PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262357 January 4, 2022 24 / 25