Unveiling biogeographical patterns of the ichthyofauna in the Tuichi basin, a biodiversity hotspot in the Bolivian Amazon, using environmental DNA

19. Dejean T, Valentini A, Miquel C, Taberlet P, Bellemain E, Miaud C. Improved detection of an alien inva- sive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2012; 49(4):953–9. 20. Piaggio AJ, Engeman RM, Hopken MW, Humphrey JS, Keacher KL, Bruce WE, et al. Detecting an elu- sive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014 Mar 1; 14(2):374–80. https://doi.org/10. 1111/1755-0998.12180 PMID: 24119154 21. Boussarie G, Bakker J, Wangensteen OS, Mariani S, Bonnin L, Juhel J-B, et al. Environmental DNA illu- minates the dark diversity of sharks. Science Advances. 2018 May 1; 4(5):eaap9661. https://doi.org/10. 1126/sciadv.aap9661 PMID: 29732403 22. Hunter M, Meigs-Friend G, Ferrante J, Takoukam Kamla A, Dorazio R, Keith-Diagne L, et al. Surveys of environmental DNA (eDNA): a new approach to estimate occurrence in Vulnerable manatee popula- tions. Endangered Species Research. 2018 Mar 13; 35:101–11. 23. Foote AD, Thomsen PF, Sveegaard S, Wahlberg M, Kielgast J, Kyhn LA, et al. Investigating the poten- tial use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for genetic monitoring of marine mammals. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7 (8):e41781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041781 PMID: 22952587 24. Jerde CL, Wilson EA, Dressler TL. Measuring global fish species richness with eDNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2019; 19(1):19–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12929 PMID: 30701707

25. Sales NG, Wangensteen OS, Carvalho DC, Deiner K, Præbel K, Coscia I, et al. Space-time dynamics in monitoring neotropical fish communities using eDNA metabarcoding. Science of The Total Environ- ment. 2021 Feb; 754:142096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142096 PMID: 32898783 26. Cilleros K, Valentini A, Allard L, Dejean T, Etienne R, Grenouillet G, et al. Unlocking biodiversity and conservation studies in high-diversity environments using environmental DNA (eDNA): A test with Guia- nese freshwater fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Jul 6];0(0). Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1755-0998.12900 PMID: 29768738 27. Jackman JM, Benvenuto C, Coscia I, Oliveira Carvalho C, Ready JS, Boubli JP, et al. eDNA in a bottle- neck: Obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems. Environmental DNA. 2021 Jul; 3(4):837–49. 28. Santana CD de, Parenti LR, Dillman CB, Coddington J, Bastos DA, Baldwin C, et al. The critical role of natural history museums in advancing eDNA for biodiversity studies: a case study with Amazonian fishes. bioRxiv. 2021 Apr 19;2021.04.18.440157. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97128-3 PMID: 34518574 29. Toomey A. The Making of a Conservation Landscape: Towards a Practice of Interdependence. Conser- vat Soc. 2020; 18(1):25. 30. Strahler AN. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans AGU. 1957; 38(6):913. 31. Wasson J-G, Barrera S, Barrère B, Binet D, Collomb D, Gonzales I, et al. Hydro-ecoregions of the Boliv-

ian Amazonian Basin: the geographical frame of running water ecosystems functioning. In: The Ecohy- drology of South American Rivers and Wetlands. International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) Press. Wallingford: M. E. McClain; 2002. p. 69–91. (IAHS; vol. 6). 32. Lawson Handley L, Read DS, Winfield IJ, Kimbell H, Johnson H, Li J, et al. Temporal and spatial varia- tion in distribution of fish environmental DNA in England’s largest lake. Environmental DNA. 2019 May; 1(1):26–39. 33. Li J, Lawson Handley LJ, Harper LR, Brys R, Watson HV, Di Muri C, et al. Limited dispersion and quick degradation of environmental DNA in fish ponds inferred by metabarcoding. Environmental DNA. 2019 Sep; 1(3):238–50. 34. Kemp BM, Smith DG. Use of bleach to eliminate contaminating DNA from the surface of bones and teeth. Forensic Science International. 2005 Nov; 154(1):53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004. 11.017 PMID: 16182949 35. Dougherty MM, Larson ER, Renshaw MA, Gantz CA, Egan SP, Erickson DM, et al. Environmental DNA (eDNA) detects the invasive rusty crayfish Orconectes rusticus at low abundances. The Journal of Applied Ecology. 2016 received; 53(3):722–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12621 PMID: 27773942 36. Elbrecht V, Leese F. PrimerMiner: an r package for development and in silico validation of DNA meta- barcoding primers. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2017; 8(5):622–6. 37. Harrison JB, Sunday JM, Rogers SM. Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications

for studying biodiversity. Proc R Soc B. 2019 Nov 20; 286(1915):20191409. https://doi.org/10.1098/ rspb.2019.1409 PMID: 31744434 PLOS ONE Fish diversity and distribution in the Tuichi basin PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262357 January 4, 2022 22 / 25