Climate-denying rumor propagation in a coupled socio-climate model: Impact on average global temperature

26. Galvani AP, Bauch CT, Anand M, Singer BH, Levin SA. Human–environment interactions in population and ecosystem health. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113(51):14502–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 1618138113 PMID: 27956616 27. Bury TM, Bauch CT, Anand M. Charting pathways to climate change mitigation in a coupled socio-cli- mate model. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019; 15(6):e1007000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007000 PMID: 31170149 28. Davis-Sowers R. Under the Influence: Putting Peer Pressure to Work. Int Soc Sci Rev. 2020; 96(2):1. 29. Leila N, Kiesewetter G, Wagner F, Scho¨pp W, Filatova T, Voinov A, et al. Assessing the macroeco- nomic impacts of individual behavioral changes on carbon emissions. Clim Change. 2019. 30. Wynes S, Nicholas KA, Zhao J, Donner SD. Measuring what works: quantifying greenhouse gas emis- sion reductions of behavioural interventions to reduce driving, meat consumption, and household energy use. Environ Res Lett. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae5d7 31. Khanna T, Baiocchi G, Callaghan M, Creutzig F, Guias H, Haddaway NR, et al. A multi-country meta- analysis on the role of behavioural change in reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions in resi- dential buildings. Nat Energy. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00866-x 32. van de Ven DJ, Gonza´lez-Eguino M, Arto I. The potential of behavioural change for climate change miti- gation: a case study for the European Union. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change. 2018; 23(6):853–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9763-y

33. Weber EU. What shapes perceptions of climate change? WIREs Clim Chang. 2010; 1(3):332–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41 34. Hargreaves T. Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. J Consum Cult. 2011; 11(1):79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390500 35. Schlu¨ ter M, Baeza A, Dressler G, Frank K, Groeneveld J, Jager WA, et al. A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems. Ecol Econ. 2017; 131:21– 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008 36. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 2012; 93(4):485–98. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 37. Menard J, Bury TM, Bauch CT, Anand M. When conflicts get heated, so does the planet: coupled social-climate dynamics under inequality. Proc R Soc B. 2021; 288(1959):20211357. https://doi.org/10. 1098/rspb.2021.1357 PMID: 34521252 38. Thornton PE, Calvin K, Jones AD, Di Vittorio AV, Bond-Lamberty B, Chini L, Shi X, et al. Biospheric feedback effects in a synchronously coupled model of human and Earth systems. Nat Clim Chang. 2017; 7(7):496–500. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3310 39. Clarke L, Eom J, Marten EH, Horowitz R, Kyle P, Link R, et al. Effects of long-term climate change on global building energy expenditures. Energy Econ. 2018; 72:667–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco. 2018.01.003 40. Nordhaus W. Evolution of modeling of the economics of global warming: changes in the DICE model,

1992-2017. Clim Chang. 2018; 148(4):623–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2218-y 41. Nordhaus W. Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. Am Econ Rev. 2019; 109 (6):1991–2014. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.6.1991 42. Hoffman AJ. Climate change as a cultural and behavioral issue: Addressing barriers and implementing solutions. Organ Dyn. 2010; 39(4):295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.07.005 43. McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Xiao C. Increasing influence of party identification on perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the United States, 2006-12. Weather Clim Soc. 2014; 6(2):194–201. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00058.1 44. Wilkins A. Machine-learning ensembled CMIP6 projection reveals socio-economic pathways will aggra- vate global warming and precipitation extremes. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2022. 45. Wu H. SCWIR: A rumor propagation model considering user waiting behavior. 2024. 46. Huo L, Dong Y, Lin T. Rumor spreading model with a focus on educational impact and optimal control. Chinese Phys B. 2021. 47. Li D. Rumor spreading model with a focus on educational impact and optimal control. 2023. 48. Daley DJ, Kendall DG. Epidemics and rumours. Nature. 1964; 204:1118. https://doi.org/10.1038/ 2041118a0 PMID: 14243408 49. Myilsamy K, Kumar MS, Kumar AS. Optimal control of a rumor model with group propagation over com- plex networks. Int J Mod Phys C. 2021; 32(03):2150035. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183121500352

50. Whitmarsh L. Behavior and climate change: The role of social norms. In: Climate Change and Society: Approaches to Understanding and Influencing Human Behavior. Routledge; 2009. p. 66–87. PLOS ONE Climate-denying rumor propagation in a coupled socio-climate model: Impact on average global temperature PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317338 January 16, 2025 17 / 18