Biodiversity and distribution of zoobenthos in the ecological water replenishment area of the Yellow River estuary coastal wetland revealed by eDNA metabarcoding

31. Lu X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Fan Y. Differences in planktonic and benthic diatoms reflect water quality during a rainstorm event in the Songhua River Basin of northeast China. Ecological Indicators. 2022; 144: 109547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109547. 32. Hsu T-HT, Chen W-J, Denis V. Navigating the scales of diversity in subtropical and coastal fish assem- blages ascertained by eDNA and visual surveys. Ecological Indicators. 2023; 148: 110044. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110044. 33. Doi H, Inui R, Matsuoka S, Akamatsu Y, Goto M, Kono T. Estimation of biodiversity metrics by environ- mental DNA metabarcoding compared with visual and capture surveys of river fish communities. Fresh- water Biology. 2021; 66: 1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13714. 34. He L, Wang Q, Wang Z, Wang F, Sun S, Liu X. Eukaryotic Diversity Based on High-Throughput 18S rRNA Sequencing and Its Relationship with Environmental Factors in a Salt Lake in Tibet, China. Water. 2022; 14: 2724. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172724. 35. Cheng R, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Li Q, Zhang J, Luo Y, et al. eDNA reveals spatial homogenization of fish diversity in a mountain river affected by a reservoir cascade. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024; 361: 121248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121248 PMID: 38820798 36. Deng Y, Jiang Y-H, Yang Y, He Z, Luo F, Zhou J. Molecular ecological network analyses. BMC Bioinfor- matics. 2012; 13: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-113. 37. Luo C, Zhao X, Zhang D, Dai Y, Li Q, Wang S, et al. Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of

Autochthonous Bioaugmentation (ABA): Cases of ABA for Phenanthrene and Biphenyl by Ralstonia sp. M1 in Industrial Wastewater. ACS EST Water. 2021; 1: 1390–1400. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acsestwater.0c00257. 38. He W, Xu D, Liang Y, Ren L, Fang D. Using eDNA to assess the fish diversity and spatial characteristics in the Changjiang River-Shijiu Lake connected system. Ecological Indicators. 2022; 139: 108968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108968. 39. Al-Rshaidat MMD, Snider A, Rosebraugh S, Devine AM, Devine TD, Plaisance L, et al. Deep COI sequencing of standardized benthic samples unveils overlooked diversity of Jordanian coral reefs in the northern Red Sea. Genome. 2016; 59: 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2015-0208 PMID: 27584940 40. Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Poulsen JY, Sato K, et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine spe- cies. ROY SOC OPEN SCI. 2015; 2. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150088 PMID: 26587265 41. Yang M, Lu K, Batzer DP, Wu H. Freshwater release into estuarine wetlands changes the structure of benthic invertebrate assemblages: A case study from the Yellow River Delta. Science of The Total Envi- ronment. 2019; 687: 752–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.154 PMID: 31412478 42. Stephenson I, Van Steenkiste NWL, Leander BS. Molecular phylogeny of neodalyellid flatworms (Rhab- docoela), including three new species from British Columbia. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2019; 57: 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12243.

43. Xinzheng L, Gan Z. Chinese Nearshore Benthos Classification System. Science Press; 2022. 44. Hestetun JT, Lanze´n A, Dahlgren TG. Grab what you can—an evaluation of spatial replication to decrease heterogeneity in sediment eDNA metabarcoding. PeerJ. 2021; 9: e11619. https://doi.org/10. 7717/peerj.11619 PMID: 34221724 45. Deiner K, Fronhofer EA, Ma¨ chler E, Walser J-C, Altermatt F. Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information. Nat Commun. 2017; 7: 12544. https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms12544. 46. Jiang Y, Wang Y, Zhou D, Ke Y, Bai J, Li W, et al. The impact assessment of hydro-biological connectiv- ity changes on the estuary wetland through the ecological restoration project in the Yellow River Delta, China. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 758: 143706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020. 143706 PMID: 33250237 47. Whitfield AK. Estuaries–how challenging are these constantly changing aquatic environments for asso- ciated fish species? Environ Biol Fish. 2021; 104: 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01085- 9. 48. Pereira CS, Lopes I, Abrantes I, Sousa JP, Chelinho S. Salinization effects on coastal ecosystems: a terrestrial model ecosystem approach. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2019; 374: 20180251. https://doi.org/10. 1098/rstb.2018.0251. 49. Torres-Alvarado M del R, Bonilla-Salinas M, Calva-Benı´tez LG, Ramı´rez Vives F. Microbiota in Brack- ish Ecosystems: From Water Quality to Ecological Processes. In: Iba´ñez AL, editor. Mexican Aquatic

Environments: A General View from Hydrobiology to Fisheries. Cham: Springer International Publish- ing; 2019. pp. 93–118. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11126-7_4. PLOS ONE Biodiversity and zoobenthos distribution in yellow river estuary wetlands revealed by eDNA metabarcoding PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315346 December 18, 2024 17 / 19