Biodiversity and distribution of zoobenthos in the ecological water replenishment area of the Yellow River estuary coastal wetland revealed by eDNA metabarcoding

with benthic impacts of salmon farms from eDNA metabarcoding of sediments. Molecular Ecology. 2021; 30: 3158–3174. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15814 PMID: 33481325 5. Arias MJ, Vaschetto PA, Marchese M, Regaldo L, Gagneten AM. Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Zoo- plankton Communities as Ecological Indicators in Urban Wetlands of Argentina. Sustainability. 2022; 14: 4045. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074045. 6. Huang Y, Li Y, Chen Q, Huang Y, Tian J, Cai M, et al. Effects of reclamation methods and habitats on macrobenthic communities and ecological health in estuarine coastal wetlands. Marine Pollution Bulle- tin. 2021; 168: 112420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112420 PMID: 33971457 7. Janas U, Burska D, Kendzierska H, Pryputniewicz-Flis D, Łukawska-Matuszewska K. Importance of benthic macrofauna and coastal biotopes for ecosystem functioning–Oxygen and nutrient fluxes in the coastal zone. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2019; 225: 106238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss. 2019.05.020. 8. Mahboob S, Al-Ghanim KA, Al-Misned F, Shahid T, Sultana S, Sultan T, et al. Impact of Water Pollution on Trophic Transfer of Fatty Acids in Fish, Microalgae, and Zoobenthos in the Food Web of a Freshwa- ter Ecosystem. Biomolecules. 2018; 9: 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9060231. 9. Chakraborty A, Saha GK, Aditya G. Macroinvertebrates as engineers for bioturbation in freshwater eco- system. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022; 29: 64447–64468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22030-y PMID: 35864394

10. Jing M, Lin D, Wu P, Kainz MJ, Bishop K, Yan H, et al. Diet influence on mercury bioaccumulation as revealed by polyunsaturated fatty acids in zoobenthos from two contrasting environments: Chinese res- ervoirs and Swedish lakes. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 782: 146410. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146410 PMID: 33839663 11. Harlıoğlu MM, Farhadi A. Importance of Gammarus in aquaculture. Aquacult Int. 2018; 26: 1327–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-018-0287-6. PLOS ONE Biodiversity and zoobenthos distribution in yellow river estuary wetlands revealed by eDNA metabarcoding PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315346 December 18, 2024 15 / 19

12. Fang J, Jiang W, Meng S, He W, Wang G, Guo E, et al. Polychaete Bioturbation Alters the Taxonomic Structure, Co-occurrence Network, and Functional Groups of Bacterial Communities in the Intertidal Flat. Microb Ecol. 2023; 86: 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-022-02036-2 PMID: 35604433 13. Thomsen ES, Almeda R, Nielsen TG. Tire particles and their leachates reduce the filtration rate of the mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Environmental Research. 2024; 195: 106348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. marenvres.2024.106348. 14. Moss B. Ecology of fresh waters: a view for the twenty-first century. John Wiley & Sons; 2010. 15. Me´ndez N. Effects of sediment organic matter on mortality, growth and development of the polychaetes Capitella teleta and Capitella sp. (Annelida: Capitellidae) in laboratory conditions. scimar. 2022; 86: e034. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.05208.034. 16. Nikula R, Strelkov P, Va¨ ino¨ la¨ R. A broad transition zone between an inner Baltic hybrid swarm and a pure North Sea subspecies of Macoma balthica (Mollusca, Bivalvia). Molecular Ecology. 2008; 17: 1505–1522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03688.x. 17. Lockwood BL, Somero GN. Transcriptomic responses to salinity stress in invasive and native blue mus- sels (genus Mytilus). Mol Ecol. 2011; 20: 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04973.x. 18. Cheng Q, Chang H, Yang X, Wang D, Wang W. Salinity and nutrient modulate soil bacterial communi- ties in the coastal wetland of the Yellow River Delta, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021; 28: 14621–

14631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11626-x PMID: 33219506 19. Yang M, Lu K, Batzer DP, Wu H. Freshwater release into estuarine wetlands changes the structure of benthic invertebrate assemblages: A case study from the Yellow River Delta. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 687: 752–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.154 PMID: 31412478 20. Pawlowski J, Bruce K, Panksep K, Aguirre FI, Amalfitano S, Apothe´ loz-Perret-Gentil L, et al. Environ- mental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods. Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 818: 151783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2021.151783 PMID: 34801504 21. Weigand H, Beermann AJ, Čiampor F, Costa FO, Csabai Z, Duarte S, et al. DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work. Science of The Total Environment. 2019; 678: 499–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019. 04.247 PMID: 31077928 22. Ruppert KM, Kline RJ, Rahman MS. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2019; 17: e00547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00547. 23. Valentini A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Civade R, Herder J, Thomsen PF, et al. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology. 2016; 25: 929–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13428 PMID: 26479867

24. He X, Sutherland TF, Abbott CL. Improved efficiency in eDNA metabarcoding of benthic metazoans by sieving sediments prior to DNA extraction. Environmental DNA. 2021; 3: 716–726. https://doi.org/10. 1002/edn3.172. 25. Prie´ V, Valentini A, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Rocle M, Poulet N, et al. Environmental DNA metabarcod- ing for freshwater bivalves biodiversity assessment: methods and results for the Western Palearctic (European sub-region). Hydrobiologia. 2021; 848: 2931–2950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-020- 04260-8. 26. Pesˇić V, Gadawski P, Gligorović B, Glo¨ er P, Grabowski M, Kova´ cs T, et al. The Diversity of the Zoo- benthos Communities of the Lake Skadar/Shkodra Basin. In: Pesˇić V, Karaman G, Kostianoy AG, edi- tors. The Skadar/Shkodra Lake Environment. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 255– 293. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_234. 27. Pawlowski J, Bruce K, Panksep K, Aguirre FI, Amalfitano S, Apothe´ loz-Perret-Gentil L, et al. Environ- mental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods. Science of The Total Environment. 2022; 818: 151783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2021.151783 PMID: 34801504 28. Antich A, Palacı´n C, Cebrian E, Golo R, Wangensteen OS, Turon X. Marine biomonitoring with eDNA: Can metabarcoding of water samples cut it as a tool for surveying benthic communities? Molecular Ecology. 2021; 30: 3175–3188. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15641 PMID: 32974967

29. Kusanke LM, Panteleit J, Stoll S, Korte E, Su¨ nger E, Schulz R, et al. Detection of the endangered Euro- pean weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis) via water and sediment samples: Testing multiple eDNA work- flows. Ecology and Evolution. 2020; 10: 8331–8344. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6540. 30. Chen X, Li S, Zhao J, Yao M. Passive eDNA sampling facilitates biodiversity monitoring and rare spe- cies detection. Environment International. 2024; 187: 108706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024. 108706 PMID: 38696978 PLOS ONE Biodiversity and zoobenthos distribution in yellow river estuary wetlands revealed by eDNA metabarcoding PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315346 December 18, 2024 16 / 19

31. Lu X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Fan Y. Differences in planktonic and benthic diatoms reflect water quality during a rainstorm event in the Songhua River Basin of northeast China. Ecological Indicators. 2022; 144: 109547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109547. 32. Hsu T-HT, Chen W-J, Denis V. Navigating the scales of diversity in subtropical and coastal fish assem- blages ascertained by eDNA and visual surveys. Ecological Indicators. 2023; 148: 110044. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110044. 33. Doi H, Inui R, Matsuoka S, Akamatsu Y, Goto M, Kono T. Estimation of biodiversity metrics by environ- mental DNA metabarcoding compared with visual and capture surveys of river fish communities. Fresh- water Biology. 2021; 66: 1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13714. 34. He L, Wang Q, Wang Z, Wang F, Sun S, Liu X. Eukaryotic Diversity Based on High-Throughput 18S rRNA Sequencing and Its Relationship with Environmental Factors in a Salt Lake in Tibet, China. Water. 2022; 14: 2724. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14172724. 35. Cheng R, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Li Q, Zhang J, Luo Y, et al. eDNA reveals spatial homogenization of fish diversity in a mountain river affected by a reservoir cascade. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024; 361: 121248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121248 PMID: 38820798 36. Deng Y, Jiang Y-H, Yang Y, He Z, Luo F, Zhou J. Molecular ecological network analyses. BMC Bioinfor- matics. 2012; 13: 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-113. 37. Luo C, Zhao X, Zhang D, Dai Y, Li Q, Wang S, et al. Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of

Autochthonous Bioaugmentation (ABA): Cases of ABA for Phenanthrene and Biphenyl by Ralstonia sp. M1 in Industrial Wastewater. ACS EST Water. 2021; 1: 1390–1400. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acsestwater.0c00257. 38. He W, Xu D, Liang Y, Ren L, Fang D. Using eDNA to assess the fish diversity and spatial characteristics in the Changjiang River-Shijiu Lake connected system. Ecological Indicators. 2022; 139: 108968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108968. 39. Al-Rshaidat MMD, Snider A, Rosebraugh S, Devine AM, Devine TD, Plaisance L, et al. Deep COI sequencing of standardized benthic samples unveils overlooked diversity of Jordanian coral reefs in the northern Red Sea. Genome. 2016; 59: 724–737. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2015-0208 PMID: 27584940 40. Miya M, Sato Y, Fukunaga T, Sado T, Poulsen JY, Sato K, et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine spe- cies. ROY SOC OPEN SCI. 2015; 2. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150088 PMID: 26587265 41. Yang M, Lu K, Batzer DP, Wu H. Freshwater release into estuarine wetlands changes the structure of benthic invertebrate assemblages: A case study from the Yellow River Delta. Science of The Total Envi- ronment. 2019; 687: 752–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.154 PMID: 31412478 42. Stephenson I, Van Steenkiste NWL, Leander BS. Molecular phylogeny of neodalyellid flatworms (Rhab- docoela), including three new species from British Columbia. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2019; 57: 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12243.

43. Xinzheng L, Gan Z. Chinese Nearshore Benthos Classification System. Science Press; 2022. 44. Hestetun JT, Lanze´n A, Dahlgren TG. Grab what you can—an evaluation of spatial replication to decrease heterogeneity in sediment eDNA metabarcoding. PeerJ. 2021; 9: e11619. https://doi.org/10. 7717/peerj.11619 PMID: 34221724 45. Deiner K, Fronhofer EA, Ma¨ chler E, Walser J-C, Altermatt F. Environmental DNA reveals that rivers are conveyer belts of biodiversity information. Nat Commun. 2017; 7: 12544. https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms12544. 46. Jiang Y, Wang Y, Zhou D, Ke Y, Bai J, Li W, et al. The impact assessment of hydro-biological connectiv- ity changes on the estuary wetland through the ecological restoration project in the Yellow River Delta, China. Science of The Total Environment. 2021; 758: 143706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020. 143706 PMID: 33250237 47. Whitfield AK. Estuaries–how challenging are these constantly changing aquatic environments for asso- ciated fish species? Environ Biol Fish. 2021; 104: 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01085- 9. 48. Pereira CS, Lopes I, Abrantes I, Sousa JP, Chelinho S. Salinization effects on coastal ecosystems: a terrestrial model ecosystem approach. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2019; 374: 20180251. https://doi.org/10. 1098/rstb.2018.0251. 49. Torres-Alvarado M del R, Bonilla-Salinas M, Calva-Benı´tez LG, Ramı´rez Vives F. Microbiota in Brack- ish Ecosystems: From Water Quality to Ecological Processes. In: Iba´ñez AL, editor. Mexican Aquatic

Environments: A General View from Hydrobiology to Fisheries. Cham: Springer International Publish- ing; 2019. pp. 93–118. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11126-7_4. PLOS ONE Biodiversity and zoobenthos distribution in yellow river estuary wetlands revealed by eDNA metabarcoding PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315346 December 18, 2024 17 / 19

50. Leal Filho W, Nagy GJ, Martinho F, Saroar M, Erache MG, Primo AL, et al. Influences of Climate Change and Variability on Estuarine Ecosystems: An Impact Study in Selected European, South Ameri- can and Asian Countries. IJERPH. 2022; 19: 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010585 PMID: 35010857 51. Ren Z, Li F, Wei J, Li S, Lv Z, Gao Y, et al. Community characteristics of macrobenthos in the Huanghe (Yellow River) Estuary during water and sediment discharge regulation. Acta Oceanol Sin. 2016; 35: 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-016-0881-2. 52. Lefcheck JS, Hughes BB, Johnson AJ, Pfirrmann BW, Rasher DB, Smyth AR, et al. Are coastal habitats important nurseries? A meta-analysis. CONSERVATION LETTERS. 2019; 12: e12645. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/conl.12645. 53. Kumar R, Nesemann H, Sharma G, Tseng L-C, Prabhakar AK, Roy SP. Community structure of macro- benthic invertebrates in the River Ganga in Bihar, India. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage. 2013; 16: 385– 394. https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2013.846200. 54. Nesemann HF, Sharma G, Kumar R, Sheetal A, Roy S. Do the rivers of Chota Nagpur Dry Forests (Jharkhand), Damodar and Subarnarekha differ in biodiversity of aquatic macrozoobenthos, functional feeding groups and biological water quality? Aquat Ecosyst Health Manage. 2017; 20: 116–129. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2017.1300041. 55. Li S, Li F, Song X, Zhang M. The influence of water-sediment regulation on macrobenthic community structures in the Huanghe River (Yellow River) Estuary during 2012–2016. Acta Oceanol Sin. 2020; 39:

120–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-020-1664-3. 56. Hu X, Zuo D, Xu Z, Huang Z, Liu B, Han Y, et al. Response of macroinvertebrate community to water quality factors and aquatic ecosystem health assessment in a typical river in Beijing, China. Environ- mental Research. 2022; 212: 113474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113474 PMID: 35594960 57. Kolicka M, Gadawski P, Dabert M. A new species of freshwater Chaetonotidae (Gastrotricha, Chaeto- notida) from Obodska Cave (Montenegro) based on morphological and molecular characters. EJT. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.354. 58. Teiwes M, Bergtold M, Traunspurger W. Factors Influencing the Vertical Distribution of Nematodes in Sediments. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 2007; 22: 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060. 2007.9664173. 59. Faubel A, Blome D, Cannon L. Sandy beach meiofauna of eastern Australia (southern Queensland and New South Wales). I. Introduction and macrostomida (Platyhelminthes). Invertebr Syst. 1994; 8: 899– 1007. 60. Mordukhovich VV, Fadeeva NP, Semenchenko AA, Kiyashko SI, Scripova ER. New and known species of the genus Desmodora De Man, 1889 (Nematoda: Desmodoridae) from the hydrothermal vent com- munities of the Piip volcano (south-west Bering Sea). Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography. 2023; 208: 105267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2023.105267 61. Kokavec I, Sˇ porka F. Occurrence and Habitat Preferences of the Euryhaline Oligochaete Paranais litor-

alis (Mu¨ller, 1784)(Clitellata: Naididae) in a Tributary of the Danube River Middle Stretch. Acta Zool Bul- gar. 2020; 72. 62. Girgan C, Marais M, Fourie H, Tiedt L, Swart A. Description of two new species, Aphanolaimus strilliae n. sp. (Nematoda:<br />Aphanolaimidae) and Makatinus africanus n. sp. (Nematoda: Aporcelaimi- dae), and SEM observations on three known species from freshwater sources in the Telperion Nature Reserve (Mpumalanga, South Africa). Zootaxa. 2019; 4651: zootaxa-4651. https://doi.org/10.11646/ zootaxa.4651.2.1. 63. Gusakov VA, Gagarin VG. An annotated checklist of the main representatives of meiobenthos from inland water bodies of Central and Southern Vietnam. I. Roundworms (Nematoda). Zootaxa. 2017; 4300: 1–43. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4300.1.1. 64. Zhong L-H, Hu X-Z, Lin Y-T, Feng W-T, Zhuang J-Y, Zhang Y, et al. A new species and new record of Polycystididae (Rhabdocoela: Kalyptorhynchia) from China. Zootaxa. 2018; 4446: 39–50. https://doi. org/10.11646/zootaxa.4446.1.3 PMID: 30313895 65. de Jesu´s-Navarrete A, Yanez-Montalvo A, Falco´ n LI, Vargas-Espo´sitos A. Nematode fauna associated with freshwater microbialites in Bacalar Lake, Quintana Roo, Mexico. Limnology. 2021; 22: 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-021-00662-2. 66. Ramalho SP, Ribeiro C, Hensen C, Scholz F, Nuzzo M, Terrinha P, et al. Benthic nematode biodiversity of the Abzu, Tiamat and Michael Ivanov mud volcanoes located along the SWIM fracture zone (Gulf of Cadiz). Mar Biodiv. 2018; 48: 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-017-0809-x.

67. Peng C, Zhao X, Liu S, Shi W, Han Y, Guo C, et al. Ocean acidification alters the burrowing behaviour, Ca2+/Mg2+-ATPase activity, metabolism, and gene expression of a bivalve species, Sinonovacula con- stricta. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2017; 575: 107–117. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12224. PLOS ONE Biodiversity and zoobenthos distribution in yellow river estuary wetlands revealed by eDNA metabarcoding PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315346 December 18, 2024 18 / 19

68. Brusa F, Leal-Zanchet AM, Noreña C, Damborenea C. Phylum Platyhelminthes. Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 101–120. 69. Bennett LW. Experimental Analysis of the Trophic Ecology of Lepidodermella squammata (Gastrotri- cha: Chaetonotida) in Mixed Culture. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society. 1979; 98: 254. https://doi.org/10.2307/3226027. 70. Boyko O, Brygadyrenko V. Survival of Nematode Larvae Strongyloides papillosus and Haemonchus contortus under the Influence of Various Groups of Organic Compounds. Diversity. 2023; 15: 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15020254. 71. Chen H, Yan L, Zhao J, Yang B, Huang G, Shi W, et al. The role of the freshwater oligochaete Limnodri- lus hoffmeisteri in the distribution of Se in a water/sediment microcosm. Science of The Total Environ- ment. 2019; 687: 1098–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.170. 72. Schroeter RE. Biology and Long-Term Trends of Alien Hydromedusae and Striped Bass in a Brackish Tidal Marsh in the San Francisco Estuary. PhD dissertation, UC San Diego. 2008. Available: https:// escholarship.org/uc/item/5gh43754. PLOS ONE Biodiversity and zoobenthos distribution in yellow river estuary wetlands revealed by eDNA metabarcoding PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315346 December 18, 2024 19 / 19