Use of instructional videos in leadership education in higher education under COVID-19: A qualitative study

41. Shek DTL, Yu L, Wu FKY, Chai WY. General university requirements at Hong Kong Polytechnic Uni- versity: Evaluation findings based on student focus groups. Assess Eval High Educ. 2015; 40 (8):1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.960362 42. Shek DTL, Yu L, Chi X. Focus group evaluation of teachers’ views on a new general education pro- gram in Hong Kong. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 2017; 29:67–74. https:// doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2017-3009 PMID: 27299208 43. Chai W, Li X, Shek DTL. The effectiveness of a leadership subject using a hybrid teaching mode dur- ing the pandemic: Objective outcome and subjective outcome evaluation. IJERPH. 2022; 19 (16):9809. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19169809 PMID: 36011436 44. Shek DTL, Zhu X, Li X, Dou D. Satisfaction with hyflex teaching and law-abiding leadership education in Hong Kong university students under COVID-19. Appl Res Qual Life. 2022; 17:2833–2858. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10040-4 PMID: 35222736 45. Shek DTL, Li X, Wong T, Yu L, Chai W, Cheng N, et al. Development of virtual teaching and learning videos for leadership education for university students in Hong Kong. Int Public Health J. 2022; 14(4): 377–389. 46. Li X, Shek DTL, Wong T, Yu L. Subjective outcome evaluation of instructional videos in leadership education. IJERPH. 2023; 20(1):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010367 PMID: 36612689 47. Shek DTL, Li X, Wong T. Video teaching materials for leadership education: Subjective outcome eval-

uation based on university students in Hong Kong. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health. Forthcoming 2023. 48. Draper AK. The principles and application of qualitative research. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004; 63:641–646. https://doi.org/10.1079/pns2004397 PMID: 15831137 49. Hara K. Quantitative and qualitative research approaches in education. Education. 1995; 115(3):351– 356. 50. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, U.S.A.: Sage Publications; 2009. 51. Ishak T, Kurniawan R, Zainuddin Z, Keumala CM. The role of pre-class asynchronous online video lec- tures in flipped-class instruction: Identifying students’ perceived need satisfaction. Journal of Peda- gogical Research. 2020; 4(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.v4i1.145 52. Scagnoli NI, Choo J, Tian J. Students’ insights on the use of video lectures in online classes: Students’ insights on video lectures. Br J Educ Technol. 2019; 50(1):399–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet. 12572 53. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, U.S.A.: Sage Publications; 2002. 54. Shek DTL, Tang VM, Han XY. Evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in the social work literature (1990–2003): Evidence that constitutes a wake-up call. Res Soc Work Pract. 2005; 15(3):180–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731504271603 55. Bogdan R, Biklen SK. Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. 5th ed. Boston, MA, U.S.A.: Pearson Education; 2007.

56. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, U.S.A.: Sage Publications; 2018. 57. Joinson AN. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of selfawareness and visual anonymity. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2001; 31:177–192. 58. Opdenakker RJG. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung = Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2006; 7(4):Art.11. 59. polyu.edu.hk. [Internet]. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; c2022 [cited 2023 Aug 12]. Available from https://www.polyu.edu.hk/en/ipao/facts-and-figures/. 60. Agius SJ. Qualitative research: Its value and applicability. Psychiatrist. 2013; 37:204–206. https://doi. org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.042770 61. Noble H, Smith J. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-based Nursing. 2015; 18(2):34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054 PMID: 25653237 62. Long J, Liu TQ, Liao YH, Qi C, He HY, Chen SB, et al. Prevalence and correlates of problematic smart- phone use in a large random sample of Chinese undergraduates. BMC Psychiatry. 2016; 16:408. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1083-3 PMID: 27855666 63. Browning MH, Larson LR, Sharaievska I, Rigolon A, McAnirlin O, Mullenbach L, et al. Psychological impacts from COVID-19 among university students: Risk factors across seven states in the United States. PloS one. 2021; 16(1):e0245327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245327 PMID: 33411812 PLOS ONE

Qualitative evaluation of virtual teaching and learning videos in leadership education PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291861 September 21, 2023 25 / 28